6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
Started by unknown · · 285 posts · last reply 16 May 2019
-
#1 ·
Here are some videos of a college tester builder. Is he right?
Any idea what his setup looks like?
update:
My Circuit is just a Dave Lawtons Phase Locked Loop (PLL) Circuit with a 240 Volt Variac Transformer, a 600 Volt SDR943-61 rectifier, a H11D1 Optocoupler with a 100 Ohm 25W Resistor and a C38M SCR connected to a a 8XA Choke with a 1N1188 Blocking Diode. . Every cubic foot of water contains 1,376 cubic feet of Hydrogen & 680 cubic feet of Oxygen. 12Volts at 0.5Amps =6W(Watts) & produces 8 Liters of HHO/Minute. Stanley Meyer states WATER is 2.5 times more explosive than Petrol, so a V8 4.7 L/100 Kilometers requires only 1.88 L/100 K of WATER = 2,586.88 L of Hydrogen. 43.11 L Hydrogen/Minute = 33W. . http://www.courtiestown.co.uk/electrolysers/dave-lawton/dave-lawton-pll-built-pcb.html Courtiestown in the UK no longer exists... So you can no longer buy any of the Dave Lawton Kits...
cheers
Steve -
#2 ·
see attachementsBuild a Stanley Meyer Water Fuel Cell for CHEAP.mp4 EASY Build 260 Volt Variac Switch Circuit Parts.mp4 How to Anti Parallel 3 0 Ohm Coils & Auto Gate.mp4 Stanley Meyers Method of HHO Production!.mp4 Stanley Meyers Water Fuel Cells just Charge & Dis-Charge for HHO.mp4
-
#3 · date not recorded
-
#4 · date not recorded
Update:
My Circuit is just a Dave Lawtons Phase Locked Loop (PLL) Circuit with a 240 Volt Variac Transformer, a 600 Volt SDR943-61 rectifier, a H11D1 Optocoupler with a 100 Ohm 25W Resistor and a C38M SCR connected to a a 8XA Choke with a 1N1188 Blocking Diode. . Every cubic foot of water contains 1,376 cubic feet of Hydrogen & 680 cubic feet of Oxygen. 12Volts at 0.5Amps =6W(Watts) & produces 8 Liters of HHO/Minute. Stanley Meyer states WATER is 2.5 times more explosive than Petrol, so a V8 4.7 L/100 Kilometers requires only 1.88 L/100 K of WATER = 2,586.88 L of Hydrogen. 43.11 L Hydrogen/Minute = 33W. . http://www.courtiestown.co.uk/electrolysers/dave-lawton/dave-lawton-pll-built-pcb.html Courtiestown in the UK no longer exists... So you can no longer buy any of the Dave Lawton Kits... -
#5 · date not recorded
My drawing of what i understood of all available info.....
Any comments?
Thanks!!!!attachment_15280 waterfuel.png
-
#6 · date not recorded
Hello Steve.
Where did you saw the 6w producing 8 LPM? -
#7 · date not recorded
Hello Steve.
Hi Xblade,
Where did you saw the 6w producing 8 LPM?
Its written in his youtube profile.
On the ' about' tab. His last profile tab.
cheers -
#8 · date not recorded
for me, it seems a bit wierd having a choke in parallel with the cell... 
-
#9 · date not recorded
. http://www.courtiestown.co.uk/electrolysers/dave-lawton/dave-lawton-pll-built-pcb.html Courtiestown in the UK no longer exists... So you can no longer buy any of the Dave Lawton Kits...
you can no longer buy these because Dave Lawton can no longer SELL these . no one wants them , what for ?
-
#10 · date not recorded
. http://www.courtiestown.co.uk/electrolysers/dave-lawton/dave-lawton-pll-built-pcb.html Courtiestown in the UK no longer exists... So you can no longer buy any of the Dave Lawton Kits...
you can no longer buy these because Dave Lawton can no longer SELL these . no one wants them , what for ?
Well, in case of an crisis, we always can make one or two.....
-
#11 · date not recorded
This guy doesnt show any proof of what he claims.
There are a lot of scam in this area. -
#12 ·
That circuit will not work. The dummy is trying to prove his theory, but doesn't understand the electronics behind doing it correctly. Also, I have done it as he explains. But you are not going to get around not using any amps to break the water down, and neither is he. And if Im Stan Meyer I could twist it around and claim i'm just using voltage to break the water down. If you want to get technical.
It is more about making the correct gas and what you do with that gas. Massive amounts are not needed.
-
#13 · date not recorded
Hi Hardkrome,
Your reaction was the same as mine, in the beginning. The way the dude talks doesnot give any confidence. But after really listening to him, explaining the coil capacitor voltage current story, he made more sense to me.
You know, in the past, i used the power from the waterfuelcell to power the primary of my alternator.
That much power came of my cell.
But i never tried to hit the cell with Bemf pulses of high voltage and then trying to short the cell out with a bulb.....
Stan always stated that you can use the watercell as a source of electrons.......100kw he even mentioned once....
Just my thoughts -
#14 · date not recorded
Hi Steve.
Are you using ss wire, or just going with a smaller gauge for the bifilar resistance? -
#15 · date not recorded
Stan always stated that you can use the watercell as a source of electrons.
the atom is the source of the free electron . > the atom of a conductor > every conductor -
#16 · date not recorded
Hi Steve.
Are you using ss wire, or just going with a smaller gauge for the bifilar resistance?
I dont have ss wire and i never used it in my coils.... -
#17 ·
Does anybody try to replicate this mans work?
Steve -
#18 · date not recorded
His configuration does not make much sense to me.
I am still on the research but at the time my scope has gone, and I dont know if I can fix it. -
#19 · date not recorded
His configuration does not make much sense to me.
I am still on the research but at the time my scope has gone, and I dont know if I can fix it.
Can you use the microphone input of your computer as scope?
His setup is shooting a pulse into the cell and then extract to power out of the cell, in the hope it takes more electrons out of the cell then he put in.....
At least, thats my gues....
In which country are you, btw?
cheers! -
#20 · date not recorded
I read a patent which said that Meyer's system is too technically difficult to be practical , due to frequently changing parameters. "Therefor", the patent said, "all that is needed is Tesla's bifilar pancake coil and a spark gap."
It'a been shown that Tesla's coil can have two discrete layers and still function accordingly. All the nXA coils are is just a linear extension of Tesla's concept. So the provided circuit should work, under the patent or not.
But I agree that the important part is what we do with the gas. Meyer pumped all of the thermal electrons out of the gas, then kept using the applied electrical vibrations to continue heating the oxygen nuclei. When these particles get hot enough, an electron or two can be knocked out of the nucleus by an impact, causing a transmutation producing Freon or Helium, and a considerable amount of heat.
No matter how we get the hho, we need to pump thermal electrons. I'm going to start with my T-spark electrodes, two of which melted on the end, pulling thermal electrons from the third, much cooler wire. (This was at 500 miliamps, which is less than one Amp of normal heating current.) -
#21 · date not recorded
I read a patent which said that Meyer's system is too technically difficult to be practical , due to frequently changing parameters. "Therefor", the patent said, "all that is needed is Tesla's bifilar pancake coil and a spark gap."
It'a been shown that Tesla's coil can have two discrete layers and still function accordingly. All the nXA coils are is just a linear extension of Tesla's concept. So the provided circuit should work, under the patent or not.
But I agree that the important part is what we do with the gas. Meyer pumped all of the thermal electrons out of the gas, then kept using the applied electrical vibrations to continue heating the oxygen nuclei. When these particles get hot enough, an electron or two can be knocked out of the nucleus by an impact, causing a transmutation producing Freon or Helium, and a considerable amount of heat.
No matter how we get the hho, we need to pump thermal electrons. I'm going to start with my T-spark electrodes, two of which melted on the end, pulling thermal electrons from the third, much cooler wire. (This was at 500 miliamps, which is less than one Amp of normal heating current.)
Maybe i dont understand the term thermal electrons, but ill guess that the knocking off electrons system of Meyer was voltage field based, whatever he ment with that.
The dude of these videos in this topic explains it on his own way by stating that the high voltage pulses were short pulses that just hit the bloch wall of water molecules before the electrolysis starts. We all know that gas takes a while to develope after putting a current on the electrodes. It would create a situation where electrons are attracted towards the bloch wall and if you short the two electrodes after those pulses, you can pull the freed electrons out of the cell. Keep on doing so, and you see much more gas being produced then as with normal electrolysis.....
Happy Eastern, everybody!
-
#22 · date not recorded
What is the gas ?
how many electrons does the Oxy atom have in its outer shell ?
theres never been any study of those basics surrounding the end product . any study of Meyers ? nope!!
we have all done the experiment that establishes that Ox wants the outer shell full , if its not full then its clamping down on the nearest atom .
if a power supply is drawn on then it can only be drawn on until depleted . a battery is full of conductor material .
if it were a solid block of copper it has the potential to be an electron supply , every atom has a free electron -
#23 ·
The big problem behind this kind of technology is there a lot of "theorists". -
#24 · date not recorded
That was John Worell Keely who said that elemental transmutation can be facilitated by adjusting the temperature of the nuclei. What Meyer said was that, without the electrons to carry off the heat, the Oxygen is processed until it gets hot enough for the nucleus to emit an electron, which causes the Oxygen to disappear. This describes a weak force interaction, and this type of reaction (eg:LENR) releases 100,000 times as much energy as a chemical reaction involving the same amount of mass.
Various people have run the numbers and concluded that Stan was using an infintessimal amount of Hydrogen. So the energy to power the buggy must have come from what he called cold fusion. That's what we should be looking at. -
#25 ·
In this video Stan discusses energy from Hydrogen so it's not the same thing as the Oxygen from his cold fusion patent. The thing I liked was the rubber band analogy, where stretching it causes it to heat up, the same as the electron bonds. I know this heating does happen because of the way epoxy heats up severely when stirred just before it cures. The wfc stays cool and that proves the electron extraction circuit is working. There is a lot of sub quantum energy available from Hydrogen, and when released, this energy is replenished by the sun.