Back to Basics
#26 ·
LC transient response to DC is identical to the LR circuit.
X-Blade
202 posts · 21 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Oct 2015 and Sep 2022
An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
Back to Basics
#23 ·
Something interesting happens when you apply voltage across a "water capacitor":
As you rise the voltage, without restricting it, the resistance drops, in a non-linear behaviour, Andija Puharich call it a non-linear load.
As you rise the voltage, without restricting it, the resistance drops, in a non-linear behaviour, Andija Puharich call it a non-linear load.
Back to Basics
#14 ·
Quote
Yeah, if you do not have enough voltage to start electrolysis, you have no current flowing
You do have current flow without electrolysis, until the "capacitor" charges up.
You can try it with a big cell and you can observe it easily.
If it looks to you irrelevant, it is up to you, but there is more interesting things happening in the cell that some people do not talk about or is just ignoring.
Back to Basics
#13 ·
The point is to prove that water behave as dielectric, but under that threshold voltage.
We are on this for years over this forum.
I dont know how many knowledge do yo have about Meyer, but if you are new to this, I suggest you to read the and do some math about the production and power.
As a lot of people had seen, there is a lot of bad figures on Meyer numbers, even in this document.
My intention is only save people some time and frustration about this, but everybody has the legitime right to desagree, but the numbers don't lie.
We are on this for years over this forum.
I dont know how many knowledge do yo have about Meyer, but if you are new to this, I suggest you to read the and do some math about the production and power.
As a lot of people had seen, there is a lot of bad figures on Meyer numbers, even in this document.
My intention is only save people some time and frustration about this, but everybody has the legitime right to desagree, but the numbers don't lie.
Back to Basics
#11 ·
Hello uziao.
We can see the cell behaving like a capacitor below the 2V.
Get a milliamp meter, and an good precision adjustable power supply.
Rise the voltage like 0,25 or 0.5 at a time, you will see the milliamps climb up as you rise the voltage and come down again, until you reach the 2v marks.
Also, if you use a signal generator and an oscilloscope across the cell, you can observe one thing:
You will get a pure dc voltage below 2v threshold, above that, you will have the signal you put in (eg. square wave) and it behaves like a resistor.
If we want to get further on this technology we need to forget about the patents and other stuff and learn by experimenting and observation, Meyer did not gave everything in a silver plate to everybody out there, and don't assume everything he says as the full truth, he was not that stupid to give his work for free.
We can see the cell behaving like a capacitor below the 2V.
Get a milliamp meter, and an good precision adjustable power supply.
Rise the voltage like 0,25 or 0.5 at a time, you will see the milliamps climb up as you rise the voltage and come down again, until you reach the 2v marks.
Also, if you use a signal generator and an oscilloscope across the cell, you can observe one thing:
You will get a pure dc voltage below 2v threshold, above that, you will have the signal you put in (eg. square wave) and it behaves like a resistor.
If we want to get further on this technology we need to forget about the patents and other stuff and learn by experimenting and observation, Meyer did not gave everything in a silver plate to everybody out there, and don't assume everything he says as the full truth, he was not that stupid to give his work for free.
I dont undestand why people imagine things that was not there...
Timeshell do you have it working?
People have to learn to say "In my opinion" until they can proove their theories.
IN MY OPINION Ronnie Walker just want attention and maybe he believes that it works like he says. But where is it working? It is like Santa...
People have to learn to say "In my opinion" until they can proove their theories.
IN MY OPINION Ronnie Walker just want attention and maybe he believes that it works like he says. But where is it working? It is like Santa...
Hello Neal.
Nice to see when people does it the same way that Meyer told us.
We need to adjust the burn rate not to change the whole motor.
Cheers.
Nice to see when people does it the same way that Meyer told us.
We need to adjust the burn rate not to change the whole motor.
Cheers.
The big problem behind this kind of technology is there a lot of "theorists".
Tony, why you and others have such precious information and dont share with others?
It looks to me that there is a "R@T Race" occuring, its too bad!
Max Miller shared the WFC dealer tape 1 with that stupid watermark, why you guys are acting like this?
Just cant understand that.
It looks to me that there is a "R@T Race" occuring, its too bad!
Max Miller shared the WFC dealer tape 1 with that stupid watermark, why you guys are acting like this?
Just cant understand that.
My thoughts is that is inverting instead of non-inverting one on the example.
It work also to "transform" the sine wave or half sine wave from feedback into perfect square wave due to the action of this two diodes,
and gives some gain.
PLL will see always the same signal amplitude, square wave pulses of good quality.
It work also to "transform" the sine wave or half sine wave from feedback into perfect square wave due to the action of this two diodes,
and gives some gain.
PLL will see always the same signal amplitude, square wave pulses of good quality.
PLL is just a tool, it locks to the signal that is fed, like you and others know.
The trick is to provide conditions to feed only this signal when this condition occurs.
Sebosfato this is what i am talking about:
(http://www.circuitstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/741-IC-Non-Inverting-Comparator-Circuit.jpg)
The trick is to provide conditions to feed only this signal when this condition occurs.
Sebosfato this is what i am talking about:
(http://www.circuitstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/741-IC-Non-Inverting-Comparator-Circuit.jpg)
I have here a coil that i have wrapped (single) on a tv flyback core that measures 1850mH, if i pulse it with a diode, on the off time i got an oscillation with 8330hZ.
If you look into "sperm wave" from ronnie walker you can see 2 things:
- Step charging into choke when pulsing
- Coil damping (oscillating) on gate at the same frequency that it was pulsed before, until almost no charge.
Maybe it can be charging the coil to an higher level and then discharged to exiter array.
- Step charging into choke when pulsing
- Coil damping (oscillating) on gate at the same frequency that it was pulsed before, until almost no charge.
Maybe it can be charging the coil to an higher level and then discharged to exiter array.
Now my problem is lack of the right tools:
My Hitachi v212 scope is not the best, but the only one i can afford, differential probes cost a lot , so i will try to build a differential input with op-amps and buy a simple hv probe thaat is cheaper.
My Hitachi v212 scope is not the best, but the only one i can afford, differential probes cost a lot , so i will try to build a differential input with op-amps and buy a simple hv probe thaat is cheaper.
I really dont believe that cell behaves like a real capacitor. It takes on charge but not the way we all think.
Resonance can be at the coils with self capacitance, it magnifies a lot the voltage the same time it restricts the amps.
What everyone think about "flux cancellation" behavior?
I have a different view of some people who said that flux cancellation restricts amps, it seems to be clear that it is opposit behavior.
Resonance can be at the coils with self capacitance, it magnifies a lot the voltage the same time it restricts the amps.
What everyone think about "flux cancellation" behavior?
I have a different view of some people who said that flux cancellation restricts amps, it seems to be clear that it is opposit behavior.
Anyone saw in person the 6 cavity cell working as he claimed?
If fun how many people claim things and no one saw any picture, video or proof of this working...
If fun how many people claim things and no one saw any picture, video or proof of this working...
There is no proof or evidence about this.
No one tested the VIC and cell from the dune buggy.
If it draws almost nothing what can explain the lm317 coupled to 2n3055 in each VIC card for the amplitude regulation?
Thats a fact and my point of view.
To get high voltage (if there is any used) it requires power (Pin=Pout) - no magic.
No one tested the VIC and cell from the dune buggy.
If it draws almost nothing what can explain the lm317 coupled to 2n3055 in each VIC card for the amplitude regulation?
Thats a fact and my point of view.
To get high voltage (if there is any used) it requires power (Pin=Pout) - no magic.
There is no center-taped transformer, so negative voltage will be allways equal on both electrodes. Do you know ohm's law?
This kind of blah blah blah dont mean a sh** to anyone.
#tomarnocu Alguem cale este idiota.
This kind of blah blah blah dont mean a sh** to anyone.
#tomarnocu Alguem cale este idiota.
Here we go again!
Some people over this foruns said its impossible to get the step-charging effect without tube coatings... here is the proof,
Check my new scope shots:
1. Step-Charge over the cell
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step0001.jpg)]
2. Upside: Channel 1 - across the cell
Downside: Channel 2 - Pulse train applied to the transistor
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step0003.jpg)
Feel free tgo ask and comment.
Some people over this foruns said its impossible to get the step-charging effect without tube coatings... here is the proof,
Check my new scope shots:
1. Step-Charge over the cell
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step0001.jpg)]
2. Upside: Channel 1 - across the cell
Downside: Channel 2 - Pulse train applied to the transistor
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step0003.jpg)
Feel free tgo ask and comment.