yea, according to this patent you definitely did not have the right ratio of dielectrics to get the stress focused on the water. consider the ceramic with the dielectric value of 3500 as the "resonant charging chokes" used to restrict amps and let voltage do the work. plastic might have a dielectric value of 2 to 10
or because the windows are on the top and the astronauts want to look at earth, so they put the belly to space
and the gravity pulls them down, and they need to be right-side up when they enter the earths atmosphere because the space shuttle is classified and built as a 'Glider' (google it) and it can't glide very well upside down while it's in the earths atmosphere.
I think you are making this more complicated than it needs to be.
I would love to read stans book, i heard him talk about it in his video and i searched for it, and couldn't find it, i assumed he was killed before he finished it or had it published, if there is a copy around i would love to have someone scan it and make it a PDF
the AMPs come out of the water, the water is an electrical source as well as a gas source.
In electrolysis you put amps into the water to stabilize the atoms after they separate so the atoms get filled up with electrons and wont join up again. In the wfc you take amps out of the water to destabilize the atoms after they separate so the atoms remain repulsively charged and wont join up again. (180 degrees out of phase)
Stan says in the NZ video if you put 100 volts across the the EEC you can pull 100 amps out of the water for 10 kW of power.
The high voltage breakdown of the water molecules release electrons into the water bath which can be considered amp-flow, but it is a result, and not a cause.
so if you reduce the time to Nano-Seconds, 10^-9, then you get Giga-Watts, 10^9, but your Joules, or energy, stays exactly the same.
If you want Tera-Watts, 10^12, then you need Pico-Seconds, 10^-12
All assuming you are using 1 Joule of energy, if you use 1000 Joules of energy, you can get Tera-Watts in Nano-Seconds.
So this is no mathematical surprise or mystery.
However the usefulness if impulses is another story, here's why:
You start with Position, x, measured in meters [m] You take the derivative of Position, x, with respect to time, meaning the rate at which x changes with time, This is Velocity, V, measured in meters/second [m/s] Now you take the derivative of Velocity, with respect to time, meaning the rate at which V changes with time, This is Acceleration, a, measured in meters/second^2 [m/s^2] Then, the magic part, you take the derivative of acceleration, with respect to time, meaning the rate at which a changes with time, This is called the "Jerk", measured in meters/second^3 [m/s^3], and a lot of interesting stuff can happen when you have action going on in the Jerk function. This is commonly looked at while designing cam-shafts for engines, because they open and close valves, with large changes in position, in tiny portions of time, as you can imagine if your engine is going 6000 rpm, that's 100 Hz for the crankshaft, which means one valve is opening AND closing 50 times a second, which means it has, say, 5 milliseconds to open, 5 milliseconds to close, and 10 milliseconds to stay closed before it opens again. So you are applying real forces, in extremely small amounts of time, and things will destroy themselves if you ask for too much to fast. The valve accelerates open, and accelerates closed, this 'rate of change of acceleration' is the impulse, or the jerk. It's the same thing we are dealing with when we use pulsed Direct Current, because the rise time (and fall time) of that current is milliseconds, or nanoseconds, and the impulse, or Jerk, or 4th derivative, is huge (or has huge effects).
What are these huge effects? consider quickly, Newtons law, that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, right, except there are some assumptions here, and the assumptions are that it is a "Point Mass" (which can never exist) and that it is a "rigid body" (which can never exist), and what is really going on, is that forces are transferred through and object at the speed of sound in the material, which you can think of as microscopic pressure waves moving through the object from atom to atom, or molecule to molecule.
SO, if you hit it, and remove your force FASTER that the speed of sound in that material, you will NOT get an equal and opposite reaction force, and hence, magic.
Just like Tesla said, Direct Current Impulses are the key to free energy.
Are you going to build one? Check out the Flynn patents I posted in a new topic, there are 5 of them, and they make way more sense in a practical way than the orbo
Yea, so I don't get the developer thing, sounds like a money grab.
And based on what JLN shows, the technology isn't complicated at all, that being said, I don't know how practical it is, and if you can pull energy from it.
Your input is going to be the driving circuit that looks at position of the rotor with a sensor and then times the pulses to the toroid coils, and your output is going to be what ever you can pull off the rotation of the rotor without making it stop...
Looks to me like the developer kit just lets you play with their computer software.
I would say build a device... JNL has enough clues there... then if it works and you want to start a company selling the stuff, then go and buy your development license.
Do they even have a patent? What is stopping you from just using the technology anyway?
I agree the wfc tech takes time and money too, but we have a lot more information to work with, and we can see Stan driving around the dune buggy on water, it offers way more promise.
As far as magnetic motors, the Flynn patent shows the best promise in my opinion.
Not sure what they are called, but I think they just tell the difference between black and white, and he has a piece of black electrical tape to trigger the sensor. (unless i am thinking of a different device...)
people build small robots with them and have them follow the black line of electrical tape.
1. Different WFC systems use different cores and VIC designs, there are different ways to accomplish the effect, however elusive... The toroid was mentioned in one system, the bobbin type was the latest, most advanced VIC design, possibly worthy of superseding all previous VIC designs. Toroid VIC's are not economically simple (mass production), while bobbin VIC's are. The context of Stan's development spanned from 1975 to 1998, and over the years his systems advanced, so keep that in mind when trying to sort out what is what and what goes with what, some details are separated by years of advancement.
2. The taper resonant cavity is part of an advanced and complicated system, and there are not many people there yet, see Hardkrome's project section.
Changing the timing is not required if you change the burn rate of the Hydrogen. This is done by recycling exhaust gasses (key point: non-combustible gases, which exhaust gases are indeed) back into the fuel mixture. This will slow down and modulate the burn rate and temperature. You can match the burning characteristics of diesel, gasoline, propane, or even leaves and paper with this method. Therefore it is not required to change the configuration of any internal combustion engine.
This information is from Stanley Meyer's Documentation and Videos, which are all available on this forum.
In the Stephen Meyer Radio interview he says stan started with running a 12 hp motor, then worked his way up, he says it took him years of trying, to get the ratio right
Well, Stan said that his hydrogen generator worked on a system that was 180 degrees out of phase.
"180 degrees out of phase with the electrolysis process"
Electrolysis: High amps Low volts Chemicals Electrons in Chemical Process Inefficient
Stan: Low amps High volts No Chemicals Electrons out Physical Process Efficient
Everywhere electrolysis is up, Stan is down, when electrolysis is one thing, Stan's is the other. It is the complete opposite. 180 degrees out of phase.