MagNet transormer design software
#4 · date not recorded
258 posts · 65 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Sep 2009 and Dec 2022
An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
#4 · date not recorded
#2 · date not recorded
#54 · date not recorded
#46 · date not recorded
#40 · date not recorded
Ok.Would it be possible for you to meter 11% ionized air,being careful to destroy any ozone into your gas stream and then ignite it?
Hard payed test info, all free for you.
I thought i was on the right path, but i wasnot.
Ionizing the output of an electrolizer is of no use, because the gas seems to be ionized already orso.
At least, my UV setup of 20watts of output into the gas didnt make any difference.
The HHO was banging the same with or without my charging/ionizing chamber.....
Toooooo bad.......... another experiment that was not working...![]()
![]()
#35 · date not recorded
After all the ionizing research is done... what then? Im wandering what are the goals of the ones posting in this thread or even those that have yet to post with the ionizing research?
Steve what are your goals with the ionizing research?
Seb what are your goals with the ionizing research?
Dave?
Please be as specific as possible and with just a first goal for now please.
I'm most interested in removing 4 electrons from the 2p sub shell of oxygen. Or at least a few of them. I'd like to see proof of concept of Stan's injector technology by mixing positively charged oxygen with excited water mist and trying to ignite it. The charged oxygen will hopefully take electrons from the excited water mist leading to the breakdown of the molecule. Stan calls for a positively charged gas, but nitrogen is very stable and hard to ionize.
#15 · date not recorded
http://www.spartanwatertreatment.com/UV-ozone-destruction.html
#47 · date not recorded
I dont have the frequency and gate adjustment matched to fill just every other pulse yet.
#38 · date not recorded
#37 · date not recorded
ok but its not changing the frequency the only thing its doing ..well i dare say the only thing but ...... wat its not doing is changing the frequency.What its doing is timing how often the frequency goes thru.(duty cycle of the frequency)Im very currious how the cell driver circuit effects the pulse from this gated signal but I would almost bet it just amplifies it so the the primary dont burn up the circut... but i really cant wait to see a waveform from this circutto me it looks just like his drawing... thing is his drawing looks like a regular square wave untill youve played with this circuit
for some reason you have to usually slide the pot a lil bit to get the sim to start sometimes ....
try this circuit....works better in the sim
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php?topic=1965.msg19749#msg19749
#35 · date not recorded
Newguy, is much simpler to use a 555 timer and an opamp like 741, so you can vary from 0 up to 100% dutycycle without changing the frequency. Please Don't think that this circuit for the gate is absolutely necessary or the only way to make the gate to put the thing to work cause its not.
Of course is better than the opamp, for higher frequencies, maybe,,,
The important thing is to match the impedance so you can apply maximum voltage to the water restricting the amps.
to me it looks just like his drawing... thing is his drawing looks like a regular square wave untill youve played with this circuit
for some reason you have to usually slide the pot a lil bit to get the sim to start sometimes ....
#33 · date not recorded
#7 · date not recorded
#4 · date not recorded
Thanks! Since i dont have my lab I'm working on a Furnace to melt down aluminum for stans plug experiments. Its a work in progress.
#3 · date not recorded
#21 · date not recorded
Ed, you keep on telling everyone you know it all and your not going to share anything and that your leaving. Why do you keep coming back? Just leave dude. We don't need your infinite intelligence granted to you by the most high.
We're all on these forums to have fun, ask questions and share and help each other. Just the other day a newbie was asking questions about Stan's tech and all you could do was tell him you knew it all and he was behind. No help, no suggestions, no guidance, nothing...
You getting kicked off the forums is not because you know it all, it's because you don't know how to treat other people.
#16 · date not recorded
Just a thought, I think we need more electronegative voltage than positive voltage across the water molecule.
#8 · date not recorded