Dankie

So the VIC can transform 10 volts into 10,000 volts/ low amps  for about 2-3 watts of electrical input when it is conneted like Stan says it should be , all north poles aligned on one side of the core .

But this does not explain the VIC from 10-3b and 10-3a , these are not connected the same way but they are used for somethin , so what is their purpose ?

This is what I am trying to find out .

i disagree, the tesla turbine would be perfect for the injector.

It has the notable characteristics of no physical mechanical impedance to fluid flow, it works off of boundary layer viscosity, works with either liquid and gas fluids or mixtures, and can handle large changes in acceleration of the drive fluid without damage to the turbine. You could run  water, steam, expanding hho, or any combination thereof through the turbine without damage, and my personal plan is to have the injector mounted in an expansion/combustion chamber that feeds into the turbine, and you can fire the injector cycles at any frequency you want, and the explosions will create rapidly accelerating gasses that are forced into the turbine, and this wont damage it. you can take it right into the hydrogen fracturing process and get an increased energy yield, and the turbine can still take it. what's more than that is you can run it on the injectors plus pure water which will absorb excess heat and power the turbine with steam as well, because it can work on various fluid mixtures without harm you can do what ever you want to it without changing the turbine at all. you can run a generator perfectly, you will need a fancy transmission if you want to run this in a car though, because you will be working with over 30,000 rpm and have to gear that down, but the torque would be insane.

Does anybody sell a tesla turbine ?

30,000 rpm would make a nice super car , lighter ,more powerful and free to run .

http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca/

IMO , If I could have w/e I wanted in the world , Id take this motor with a single tiny wfc injector .

And a magnetic water filter , and a cell rejuvenating scalar field machine .

Its funny how everything is so interconnected that this may actually happen , one day in the future if I study and try hard enough .

If we read Stan's words we will be inspired , we MUST read his words . I believe they may hold some sort of hidden secret .

i can guarantee that it iis in with all the boxes and the rest of stans collection that that one guy is in possession of.

In that case I will ask Dynodon to see if this can be found .

The aboe is called `Tower Speak```, it is much superior to normal talking

Haven't read much of your posts here lately, too much for me atm
but you said matter and light are the same, and I came to a similar conclusion with some open questions:

an electron

is clearly a standing wave.
Matter is a standing wave on the substance of space-time. Spacetime gets concentrated by C2 giving it the properties of matter, this costs and thus stores energy.
What is gravity: imagine a rope with both ends tied to rubber bands, now swing
the center of the rope until standing waves occur, the ends pull the rubber bands towards the inside.
Standing waves of matter is pulling space-time's elastic properties inwards the same way, as a result a gravity (potential) occurs.

Light is a traveling wave, this is the reason light flows over the space-time surface (with zero resistance, defined by the waves E and B and space-time's u and m) and matter doesn't.
Light isn't a standing wave, thus no properties matter and zero mass is measured.
Positrons are anti matter, meaning? negative mass makes no sense, it must have something to do with the properties of  its standing wave.
Instead of pulling (contracting) space-time, it expands it?

What keeps a standing wave in motion? Some interlocking mechanism or a constant flow of energy... self energy?
Can its oscillating source interact with traveling waves (light), thus increasing the energy? Is this the way matter absorbs photons? No one knows what photons are, but everyone thinks he/she knows. They are a huge mystery.
Are light and matter on opposite sides of the same coin, with the only difference the type of wave?

Thus ends my brainfart.

Very nice brainfart .

So how it is we do this now heh ?

Gentleman plz ....

If you feel like boasting about your superior IQ or if you wanna fight  , just go to overunity.com and insult people , you can even curse at people's mothers and never get warned .

Over here we are never confrontational , we are extremely lucky to have this very focused forum .

it means that when the 50% duty cycle on pulse charges up the inductor and then on the off pulse the inductor releases an exact equal pulse.....hence unipolar double pulses.

even 2curiouswfc didn't ahve a good double pulse.....these double pulses are 1kv with a 5 volt amplitude input.

Well it may be that you are right .

VIC coil 6-1 is not like a regular coil , its a pancake coil bifilar and wrapped with a transformer . It may just work like you say it works .

W/e way you choose it will be high-volts low amps .

Yes it does look like the same waveform , but it is not doubled either and doesnt tell me much if this is really working .

You say its working , I say lets check the other caracteristics we should see like voltage rise @ a certain frequency and input amps going down . , thats why I ask other questions .

When you say "it works" , plz elaborate .

dankie it is not....it is completely seperate......6-1 is not variable voltage control i can show you with my scope what happens if you put a normal 50 percent duty square wave into it without the correct proportion of amplitude to power.

and the only diode i am using is the one on john's cil...aka the ONLY DIODE IN THE VIC CIRCUIT.

How can you be sure ?

Your scope shows me that your transformer is working in a unipolar way .

but If your connection has no current phase , it will be hard for you to reach any sort of resonance , that is why I say you must test with a phase meter to see what is happening when you are switching those freqs

Now if you cant reach resonance theres a problem , it means this isnt a VIC , and this amplitude theory is out of the blue , theres a problem ... Amplitude should be independant , its not working with lower voltage or higher voltage  ? Is that nice waveform frequency dependant ?

Now is there a voltage rise @ a specific frequency ? I understand there is not ...

Are you pulsing this with your frequency generator straight up ? You need a power source dude , full 12 volts from a battery with only the primary resistance and mayeb a tiny bit more , thats it  .

Somebody told me me that the VIC 6-1 might actually be the the "amplitude control circuit" for this bifilar circuit . It would be great to see with a phase meter , if there is actually some current phasing going on with John's connection as the frequency is changing, I believe there is not , so I wonder if this is not just some advanced form of power supply .

It is true that the waveform is the same but that waveform will always be the same when you have capacitance in the circuit , its nothing telling at all .

Also I wonder why go through so much trouble when a normal rectified transformer would do the same thing , perhaps a question of efficiency ?

But then theres also the issue of how it is you should connect the VIC 6-1 to this bifilar , it all makes no sense , the bifilar is grounded but is also connected to the 6-1...

Also , Kinesis , plz confirm that you are indeed getting some unipolar pulses with no other diode besides the one before the positive red choke and inputing unipolar pulsed dc on primary side.

That pic I recognize from mr John Keely´s work. Read him, he is perhaps the best experimental physicist that ever existed, also check out keelytech.com - Keely was a giant and www.witts.ws are following in his footsteps with their work on crystals and hf dissonance etc. I believe witts i the best group out there, by far. Hopefully they will get some funding from people and get stronger, Sir Timothy Thrapp has been persecuted for 20 years, simply because he is the best one I believe.

Interresting comments about how storms are an expression of this energy form .

Outlaw , plz do not get carried away .

I prefer when you end your sentences without a ?

Waiting for our approval is not gonna happen , find good evidence and confirm us .

stan knew how the universe works..   

Yes sir , Stan was a different kind of engineer .

He was an observer of nature , he simply understood it just like that mysterious ED guy .

Stan was engineering *matter* , this is what Bearden was talking about , *precursor engineering* .

Ok so I believe 100% that this scalar stuff is for real .

So we need 2 opposing waves , also we need something with mass , there must be mass @ the intersection point for an explosion to happen , the more mass the better ...

What if our mass was water and we are just using a "scalar destructive force" to power our cars ?

check out @ 5.30 of this video , he talks of scalar wave weaponry .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsTcx3bvZeY&feature=related

I cant find squat about this on google , nothing .

I can find H2opower's posts where he mentions this word and compares it to lightning , yet again he is always saying how he understand Meyers and comparing everything to Lightning , guys is such a fake ass little shit .

Seriously there has been alot of this ... Wheres Hdemartin  ? Wheres 2curious4WFC ? Wheres mystery Mike guy ?

All of them gone ... one after another . And Meyl too is keeping his mouth shut , who knows what great things Meyl discovered ...

god dammit .

Why is the good info so hard to come by . Its sooooooooo hard to get the needed info to build this , I guess we will always be dealing with bits and pieces when dealing with something so big .

He's talking about scalar waves and their influence on water. Then he's talking about his institute where he is developing projects for the industry, they did a project on water and the conversion of water to HHO.  Then a bit about efficiency of electrolysis and getting up the efficiency of the conversion, he's talking about high voltage electrolysis which seems to have a worse efficiency factor then standard electrolysis, but they do research on new technologies and on-demand electrolysis.
could be meyer technology, but he doesn't go into detail.

Did he mention what was the influence on water ?