Well I am also coming to the concluclusion that ac is just easier to use for testing out the Meyers theories .
Stephen Meyers seems to be using some advanced alternator setup with dc offset and some sort of impedance ringing phenomenon . Some sort or crowbar effect ? This is obviously very technical electrical stuff with all the current phasing going on here .
I am STILL trying to figure it all out , his circuit/patent is a bit hard to grasp.but I think I'm getting there .
I can adjust my amplitude/frequency independently , The main frequency can be powered by a VCO so w/e curve balls come my way I'm ready . Multiple 3 phase signals can be synchronized . Now try doing that with an alternator ...
I'm sorry , this is a real heartbreaker ... But somewhere along some tiny bit of evidence , an obervation or w/e has to pull you in a certain direction and narrow it down evr more closely ... It seems you never had that moment , I am sure you were really looking hard .
But this Bob Boyce story smelled fishy right from the start ... What kind of guy gets to understand this science but cant properly release a pulsing circuit that doesnt have this "ghost" in the circuit that makes things 100 times more complicated. And also , things like this dont just "happen" , he basicly lucked out on that boat because of some diode ?? Give be a break ... Impossible... If its so hard to tune then how can "gods luck" make it work with some "broken diode" lol ... Thats one a 99999999 chance
Bad shit again from panacea who always find themselves releasing absolute bogus .
Why dont you just buy the dam thing , its gonna cost you the same exact thing to build your own anyways ... Not to mention the trouble you will go throught and all the unknown variables to frustrate you .
Seriously , you think he's gonna tell anything ? He has chosen to sell his product and rightfully so , revealing his secret will hurt his business .
Aha! But if we then pipe the resulting gas bubbles out of that local tickled-vacuum region -- i.e., out of the water container itself-- and a few inches away and into the combustion chamber of a nearby combustion engine, then the vacuum in that combustion chamber is "normal" and not being "tickled". Hence the OH bond is back in its full normal probability, and so the mix of O2 and H2 will burn and power the engine, giving no exhaust except water vapor.
Lol sorry JohnB , never read that link . Now that its all there and highlighted for me , yeah its awfully similar . This is probably what Stan is talking about .
Next question is how do we do this ? With voltage ? Non-voltage ?
Fastimports3 , welcome to this site , we need some fresh experimenters around here , your experience is welcomed around these woods .
My master oscillator will soon be ready , after all these months stalling on wasted pcbs , I know its been a long wait .
Power will be frequency independant with 10 times higher frequency range , Its gonna be anywhere from 500 to 2000 watts more efficient @ exciting that water cell than any of these mechanical alternators , not to mention portable for some outside experimenting and will never show signs of wear n tear . None of those wires coming from your house LOL !
our only loss is the cell*0.40 and a bit in the transformer winding . And any other alternator added after that will cost only 3 op amps , 6 power transistors , 6 heatsinks , and piece of wire . About 30-35$ .
Hows that for experimenting ??
I will send some of these for free to the people I consider have major experience in the HHO field , they can have as much fun as they want as long as they report back on this site , there , everybody will start with the same base oscillator that they fine tune to their cells , there will be need for major cooperation with the impedance matchings and tuning .
It's most likely a scam juding from past inventors and companies. I thought about how they could have cheated on the overunity test. the oscilloscope shows the energy as I² * R. They could have chosen a larger R than in reality and make it look like overunity. As i said i'm interested in testing from independent people.
Give it 6 months and if we still see charged up batteries and a perpetual rotating motor it will be one of thos bedini type thing .
Them companies surely will developp something soon .
Nah Im sure you will not get there , your idea is too crazy and expensive now that you mention 5MW and platinum and tanks . You cant pull off this huge build , I know you will choke .
It has taken me over a year to finish this 3 phase oscillator + 6 channel amplifier , and I have spent 1000 hours and 1000$ , I have restarted 2 times the amplifier when seeing the problematic at hand and understanding what was happening . You dont even have the rest of the $ . I really dont think you can pull this off .
I wont send you 25$ after all , I have my own mosfets to buy anyways .
You should work on something simpler and cheaper and proven like Kapanadze , I dont like the idea of competing with the mother frikkin army and relying on a inventor wich is in it for big contracts .
We have to be adult with ourselves , this concept does not respect the concept of KISS and cheap , you couldnt get this kind of power from your street.
I think you should start asking if you are making good decisions and advancing yoiurself in life with these kind of projects .
point by point: 1. chokes...in Stans circuits they can do 2 things. 1 = become magnetically charged and then discharging into a HV negative spike, or 2 = filter of some noices and spikes The theory that fits by explanation nr 2 is that Stan was charging his wfc like a capacitor and the chokes were there to soften the raising voltage pulses of the circuit.
2. Nathan Stubblefields coils had to do with Scalar waves and not with tesla's longitudinal waves. 3. and yes, if you have 10Kv and 1ma, you have automatically reduced amps..
I hope that i didnt forget any questions.......
br Steve
I disagree , Longitudinal and scalar are the same , it has a varitety of usage from cold explosion waponry to healing purposes to telecommunications , the russians use this for telecommunications .
There is absolutely zero info about stubblefield coils , but it appears that it was made with a mix of iron and copper wire... or copper wire with bismuth ...
Under the bold letter POWER COUPLING you will find this quote
Another method I may suggest, use iron wire next to copper wire in perfectly balanced coils like a Stubblefield cell. We know that each one will couple at a different level to the scalar field and between them we may produce an effect particularly if we set up a magnetic field between them. A coil with one side copper and one side iron, may give a more immediate result.
Well, Stan said that his hydrogen generator worked on a system that was 180 degrees out of phase.
"180 degrees out of phase with the electrolysis process"
Electrolysis: High amps Low volts Chemicals Electrons in Chemical Process Inefficient
Stan: Low amps High volts No Chemicals Electrons out Physical Process Efficient
Everywhere electrolysis is up, Stan is down, when electrolysis is one thing, Stan's is the other. It is the complete opposite. 180 degrees out of phase.
This new "neutrinolysis" term has me very excited , I believe there is something here and it smells very very nice .
Well, Stan said that his hydrogen generator worked on a system that was 180 degrees out of phase. Sofar i can follow Dankie. The question is what was 180 out of phase? If you hit voltage against voltage, you get zero. Same frequency against same frequency = noice In a RC setup you can shift voltage against amps. What would it bring if you cut of the signal before amp kick in and after voltage raised?
Again, i just wrote some food for thoughts
br Steve
Yes Stevie , It would be interresting to see with a phase meter the relation of currents of both negative side and positive side of the cell .
Interresting , there was a youtube video by some optical-electro engineer talking about this , youtube removed the user like 1 hour aftrwards .
Couldnt find anything , I tried all the key-words I tried , the video was gone ... It was some conference with some engineer guy , he simply explained what the dam scalar finally were . I always do a search on youtube for "scalar waves" and such .
A lady asked about scalar waves , he simply drew some mirror waveform kinda like Meyers and said that scalar waves happens when 2 waves , w/e waves , of same frequency w/e frequency , cancel out eachother . This creates what he called "interference patterns" ... Again , this is all textbook and nothing special .
But it was nice to finally get a definitive answer .