Dankie

space-time= dont even try to talk like you udnerstand space time in mathematical concepts HAITHAR.

Funny 

Bearden is too hard to understand to be an counter-intel agent , the guy is talking chinese .

A cointel agent is something like the Ravi doceument , something big , something popular .

Tom Bearden isthe crazy old guy in the corner...

yea because you seem to have a wide background in theoretic physics and scientific research in general aside from watching google video documentations and reading pdfs which aren't researched well (you did admit this in your last post). i believe meyer's technology can work but it's not that university science and especially their methods are not based on proof instead of wild guesswork.
so instead on driving myself crazy with mib and such i attend a university (like meyer did by the way for some time).

I connected the dots and I am not in EE , I was in construction engineering but I quit because it was too boring . Now I'm doing industrial electronics @ cegep (college ) , I may or may not go to EE but if I can get this working why would I waste my time with more boring school , besides these people are dumb , most of them are straight impractical and dont know shit .

For me , its all about assmilating the info and the dots connect by themselves , and yes its theoretical and I read and trust these pdf's , thx you . What kind of propaganda *accepted science* are you talking about , I trust more Tom Bearden than the american science institute ? When is the last time you heard them talking about Stan Meyers ...

The way Bearden gives the info is subtil , hes an undercover for us , tiping us off in the open with extreme knowledge .

the fact alone that he attests John Kanzius a Dr. title makes the whole pdf dubious and untrustworthy.

Quote

[space-time] = [virtual particle flux of vacuum] = [energy]

lol

Well I dont think he bothered too much researching into the guy , he just saw the video and layed out a hypothesis , a very well informed hypothesis . There is nothing more out there about Kanzius .

Obviously , what we are trying to accomplish here is way beyond your simple EE .

I believe we touched opon something interresting yesterday , outlaw was thoerizing on this .

I said the following .

So what if it were possible to *pump* our water (dipole) , I believe this is what Stan was referring too , this is the broken symetry we are after , this is how I believe Daniel Dingel was creating electricity , this is what Stephen Meyers was saying . The *art of pumping*

What if we could do this , would the water then be charged ( like a capacitor ) , could we then apply a polarizing force using the waters *own magical charge* to break itself in a unipolar way with a diode in the circuit .

Or maybe this is just the way the gas gets more GTNT power .

Plz discuss ,  I believe this hypothesis takes into account why we simply cant charge our water capacitor and fills in the blank holes .

thanks alan,  today i finished my pwm system, which can be used with a duty cycle from 0% to 100% and pulse frequency from 0,25Hz to 8Mhz,


news on my project: I got my tubes with a gap of around 1mm and a bifilar coil, will measure the inductivity and capacity of both and with the help of that set the frequency to resonate.
at the moment i cannot get more than a few volts on the tubes, if they are not present i can measure nearly 500v after the transformer depending on the frequency, voltage dies in water as some people told before.

if i cannot get this thing to work i'll drop meyers completely, i followed the process described in his first patent which lay the foundation to his other work, if that doesn't work i'll let it go..

If it doesnt work , you have to research why it doesnt work and find a solution .

Very interresting .

That little snitch was trying to censor and stop  the phd who uncovered morray's device from talking  ....

Lol nice find , it looks like the bostick coil .

What is that thing .

interresting ....lol

bump

I am actually the first ever , in the entire world , who is making this the way its supposed to be done , or at least trying too .

Past simply putting bobbins and cell together and praying . I hope my method will show results , my methodology is certainly more time efficient and '' dummy proof '' and more 'tunable'

I dont have or need a fancy education , I just do it .

Well first of all , you gotta know what exactly impedance and reactance is . Then you must read the puharich papers and Hydroxyl paper , and when you ask yourself the question of why exactly is Stan leaving calculations and formulas , those were not therefor nothing if anything goes .

And when you actually start studying RF and electricity , instead of trying to find "visual" representations of what impedance is on youtube and trying t "imagine" impedance... 

And when you realise that your source and load will be mismatched right from the start unless it has been pre-calculated aka "tuned bobbins and cell" , either that or you have an impedance matching circuit .

When you reach that point you can start seeing a "visual connection" , untill then , it will be impossible to even dream about it in your sleep .

You question , or your views , ressemble the oversimplified views of sebosfato

Why when people try it , it doesnt work . Because it doesnt work simple like BEMF that you or Hydro can make with a "secret connection" or a "high-amps" discharge ... Those are all easy answers ...

What about impedance matching ? What about tuning your source to your cell .

Stevie , I think sometimes you are just running around in circles , did you even make that GEET working ?

There is no magic magic way to connect a randomly made choke and the "BEMF" super spikes do the work . There is a whole tuning aspect here , and these inductive spikes are just a part of it .

Yeah I see it , it i from that company .

But it means absolutely nothing .

I see a guy with a dirty shirt , thats all I see .

You should ask around , many people have tried replicating his cell . As you may have noticed , nobody is talking about ravi anymore .

I think he had a post @ overunity.com

Ravi papers are 100%  blasphemy  . That guy caused way to much damage , nobody talks aout him anymore because nobdy could ever replicate his cell .

People have concluded that he was disinfo .

I'm going for the Oxygen , So a 500 nm laser  Stevie ?

What is that 656 wavelenght , some centered frequency that all  the atoms react too ?

I wanna make this simple as possible , will only use 1 laser .

Quote from: WaytoGo on May 01, 2009, 20:31:18 pm

Yes, this is a big question.

I heard Stan says in a video the wfc operates on 0 - 2000 Volts,

I have also read that you need at least 1500 Volts to start the molecular ringing.

Kilovolt and milliamp pulses with twenty thousand cycles across the excitors is said to shake the molecules apart.

The alternator could have been used as a "hertz machine" and combined with a pulse circuit it may reach 20.000 Hz

He says he is doing the exactly opposite of the electrolysis proses.

Maybe he was taking OUT electrons so the water molecule collapsed?..

Thats an interesting question. How to extract electrons from water, without the molecules being aligned?
For sure, there is always an potential of voltage in water, but the current is pretty low.
The hydrogen atoms are always swapping oxygen atoms, so electrons must be floating as well time from time.
So, a pulsing circuit with an electron consuming device attached to electrodes would do the job, i ll guess.
Anybody any suggestions?

Steve

Does the EEC have a diode , I dont remember ...