Let me see if I understand what you are saying: Coils shares the same core (mutual inductance), but they are opposing each other (L1 + L2 -2M ). So, according to my (little) knowledge, the two coils act as a single coil in series with the "capacitor"?
Timeshell, how it is supposed to measure the resonance? From what I saw from Ronnie, when we "supposed" hit the resonance current is at the maximum and only left is the wire resistance and the water bath resistivity (re).
My experiments showed me that when we wind it bifilar, with some sort of resin beween layers, at a certain frequency / condition, Voltage across each inductor reach high voltage and current rises higher than the secondary winding can reach when shorted.
From my experiments water behaves like a capacitor below 2V otherwise it acts like a resistor. Set you PSU to 0.5V connect an ammeter with 1 to 100ma, rise the voltage 0.5V each time and wait, Needle will rise and drop again, but until you reach aprox 2V.
Show me ONE video of a water capacitor without any insulation sustaining voltage after switch off of voltage without inductors. Only the newbies to this research will believe in that theory of the capacitor. The only comparison possible to a capacitor is the work that is related to the plate area and the distance between the two plates. If you thing that you are another "walkie-talkie" show us a single video of it.
Timeshell how could you get rid of all water between the tubes? it is impossible, even with amp leakage. There is no such thing as "water capacitor" and there is no LC resonance between inductor and the supposed "capacitor".
Some people just want to see their or other's theories to be tested by others, because they are tired of wasting their own money, others just make part of the "Ronnie Walkie-Talkie" team and want to defend his friend.
The feedback circuit transforms any incoming signal to a perfect square wave, if we apply a pulsed signal to a resistor (the cell) throught an inductor, the signal across th plates will look as a triangle wave (if the inductor do not saturate), and at the output of the opamp it will be a perfect square wave. This is a very useful circuit, I am building a speeduino board, and guess what I'm using for VR conditioner (crankshaft sensor) ? Meyer feedback circuit. It gives me a very nice 5v square wave.
Hello Steve, it looks like it locks to whatever signal it receives, since the opamp and the diodes converts the signal to square wave. Just need to be pulsed signal.
In my opinion it is just another FAS device... (Fake as $H..)
Andrija Puharich talks about resonance to be the most current with the less power applied, Meyer talks the opposite with almost same circuit (inductors and transformer) with exception of the diode.
Everyone who think by their own head will question all of this.
Nobody has to follow a patent in order to make something to work.
It is more than proved that there is nothing true about that in the patent. Some can argue back and forth but in the end there is no sucessfull replication of this work, not in the condiitons mentioned in the patents.
The only way to do this is start from the earlier work and try to find out how to improve that.
Forget miracle claims of no amps, it will consume power whatever you like it or not. The difference is there will not be a chemical reaction, there will be no additives to the water and there will not be any reaction with the electrodes, chemically. Patent figures was just exagerated to be distinct from electrolysis and grant the patent. And there is no f*cking capacitor WFC, just a non linear resistor.