Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

X-Blade

202 posts · 21 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Oct 2015 and Sep 2022

An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Hello to everyone.

On my experiments with Stanley Meyer WFC, when i connect the scope probe over the cell i got this waveform:
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step001.jpg)
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step002.jpg)

My setup is;



Signal generator: Arduino nano v3 with square wave generator program based on tone.h library (timer2)
 
-Frequency 3 to 4 khz (dont remember exactly).
 - Gate on time 45 milliseconds
 - Gate off time 50 milliseconds


Transformer:

- Core: Flyback TV Transformer
- Primary: 160 Turns 0.5mm enamelled wire (0.0155in)
- Secondary: 320 Turns 0.5mm enamelled wire (0.0155in) (Just for test - 1:2)


Chokes:

1 Bifilar coil of 95 turns  0.85mm enamelled wire wound on ferrite rod with 9,5mm diameter


Power: 12v car Battery

Cell:

2 tubes with 80mm long
inner: 14mm x 0.7mm thickness
outer: 22mm x 0.7mm thickness

Both 304L Stainless Steel (used for water in houses)
The outside tube of the cell was isolated with ISLARC insulation Spray , ONLY THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE OUTSIDE TUBE


Feel free to comment and to ask.
Yes your point of view is correct, but i belive that minimum current Stan stated is across the cell, even at 0.025A over  2KV will draw 50W
that represent a primary load of  4.17A @ 12V.

But some people used to say that this load is as primary and this is clear on the patent : Load across the cell.

Stan stated it even in new zeland house meeting video.

39:22 to 40:00 You can hear it from Stan's words:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGqCaVFWIWQ[/youtube]




The pictures and the data collected by Dynodon is very precious! Thanks to him again and again!
Some people saying that stan states that per VIC unit from the dune buggy the amp draw at resonance or out of it will be few milliamps.
That is not true and lets discuss that in fair way.

Here is some start point:

Look into voltage amplitude control, There is an adjustable linear voltage regulator that can handle about 1 or 1.5 amp ALONE, right?
Why did Stan put it coupled with 2n3055 transistor?

The answer is easy:
To work ABOVE this load (from 2 to about 6 Amps at maximum).

Lets talk about it and make this forum back to live again.

Who is right discusion

#58 · date not recorded

You open your mouth so wide just to say "The owner of T.G.S."  we all waiting to see your products working as you claim...

Now, i can clearly see who "want some tap in the back" or a prize...


This forum needs more experimenters, less theories and more work.

Who is right discusion

#52 · date not recorded

sabosfato, 200w with tiny bubbles is far below from Faraday electrolysis.

Who is right discusion

#48 · date not recorded

What TGS showed was only high voltage, large watts and tiny bubbles.

Anyone saw the crux WFC or qiman13 (Aaron Murakami) WFC?

Who is right discusion

#44 · date not recorded

Maybe because your aproach has been not the best.

Just go away if you feel not welcome.

Easy as that.

(Im still waiting to see where Stan used a bath of oil in transformers, maybe the scientific method, lol).

You dont know even what happens with some capacitors in series, you are so stupid and ignorant that make discuss to you so sad.
Did you calculate the capacitance of your cells in series? how? what is your resonant frequencY ? Your capacitance? coils inductance and reactance at "resonnat action" (not resonance).

Who is right discusion

#39 · date not recorded

This guy (TGS) Come here always with arrogance and disrespect to everyone here in the forum.

When we post some of our work he says "You come here more to get tap in the back" and maybe is what he is doing too!

People like him dont deserve any attention or respect because he dont respect others and their opinion.

Who is right discusion

#33 · date not recorded

8XA IS NOT RESONANT CIRCUIT!

This was the first patents from Stanley Meyer before the resonant system.

Dont try to achieve resonance with this because you will get frustrated.

Who is right discusion

#32 · date not recorded

Why the hell people are still mixing Stans Circuits?? I can't understand...

Who is right discusion

#14 · date not recorded

TGS there is a part that people dont understand.

"less than half an Amp".

This is not for the source of voltage, but over the secondary or whatever.
Some stupid people think that the dune buggy consumed about 7 to 12w per VIC and the proof is that amplitude control for the voltage works with a Lm317 (or LMx17 family) linear regulator  that can easy handle 1A, coupled with 2n3055 NPN power transistor making a capable 4 to 6 Amp 2.5 to 12V Regulator, there is a reason why.

Power in = Power out

For example: 12vx5A=60W in a transformer VIC (in a ideal non realistic) at secondary it will deliver(for example) 100V @ 0.6A
or if someone interested 2KV @ 0.03A (30ma) using that primary @ 12Vx5A.

People, dont get illuded about the 0.5A 12V.

Who is right discusion

#12 · date not recorded

TGS I dont believe that Meyer really worked in a KV range,  only at the coils, back EMF directed by the Diode,during the pulse off time. that produces high voltage spike at very high speed / low time.

The coils were wrapped in same direction, making part of the secondary transformer, and you can clearly see what happens with a coil in the same core in series with secondary windings with the same phase orientation... You can see it on TV flyback transformers (NOTE THAT: Stan didnt use it as flyback topology, but it work the same principle for all transformers).

Sum the 3 coils and you will see what i am talking about...

Who is right discusion

#10 · date not recorded

TGS a small questions to your "smart" brain and short reply with a few words will very apreciated :

1. Is this B+ and B- Aplied at exactly same time according to your experiences?

2. If it was, how can you explain your out of phase waveform ?

3. On a differential probe, i believe(I may not be correct if it works like differential OP amp), its expected that equal differences will output NULL instead.

4. Where you connect the two leads of probe?

5. Stan says Larger Cells will resonate on frequencies of 50khz or above, yesterday i got this strange waveform on my single-ended poor little probe:
(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/wf.png)
It was near to 62.5khz (near to 60khz it appears and starts to grow). when i rise it a little bit some 2 or 3 khz it almost disapeared.

How do you explain that phenomena?

I will waiting your replies patiently.

Who is right discusion

#6 · date not recorded

I saw some videos of Russ i really apreciated his effort but i still thing that he doesnt know what he is doing.

Who is right discusion

#5 · date not recorded

Show proof of your work before you theorize.

As i saw in some forum there is a phrase like this:

"Theorizers are like high voltage: only produces hot air and death"

There was something close to that, dont remember exactly...

Stop the "blah blah blah" and prove is that way.

Who is right discusion

#4 · date not recorded

Lets see TGS, is this your video?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCnRdiKbINM[/youtube]