X-Blade

TGS you show amp meter without volts in. what was the power in?

This s not resonant cell its a crap forced high voltage electrolysis below Faraday Electrolysis.

#vaitomarnocu

TGS is trying to charge it with a very large high voltage transformer, this is the point we disagree (and other questions).

Thank you  sebosfato.

I read some topics you wrote and it makes a lot of sense to me.

And im glad to see you are brazilian, im from Portugal. It can be easy to contact you and exchange some point of view.

Best wishes.

Meyer said a lot of contradict.

This KV voltage are on the coils only.

Look at the dune buggy transformer; Did it release some kilovolts to a diode that supports only 600v?

I dont think so!

Put the scope probes over the coils, or simulate on Multisim and get a measurement.

If (I am not saying exactly it is) all coils sharing the same core, the two chokes become part of secondary, based on Tony Woodside and Dynodon  measurements of inductance ratio relative to primary coil, you can see the maximum this transformer produces with load is 250V.

Check it by yourself.

OH GOD! AMAZING!

You're wasting near to 420W (based on the video description) of electrical power! PRISE TO LORD!

And wasting our time with your pathetic interpretations of stanley meyer stuff.

Where is the Ammeter?

We need to know exactly how many amps, and volts or the power (W).

Your scope shot shows 196V max

How about amp load?

I am still waiting for the "tremenduous amount of hydrogen and oxygen gases" as Stan stated.
TGS can't show any usable production and come here to critisize and desencourage others.
I dont want to see more SH** from TGS until he show some good production with his mixed setup.

My setup produces more with 24v@100ma than TGS with 7kv.

Until that day, better stay away from my topic.

I cant see any step-charging effect in this scope shot.

1st- If you are applying DC pulsed voltage, there is no need of a differential probe.

2nd- what i see is a sequential charge and discharge with almost same amplitude.

3rd- your setup is a mix of 3 stans technology.

Your setup didnt produce any gas proving you're right.

Until you have a proof of concept about your theory, stop saying that.

Did you achieved the ionization treshold? (maybe 1 billion volts, lol). TGS #tomarnocuu

TGS you are a joke.

Nope, low output and low power (24v@0,1A) like other users. 

Nice document... i have not see before... but is more of the same....

xblade compliments for your work...

my waveform looks just little different but who knows... keep going...

is your cell grounded ?

No. it is not grounded.

I think that i saw this setup on the youtube.
Are you the "Diesel Mechanic"?

Just reply this question before a start to laught out loud... 

I am  not saying that i am right, but what sustains my theory is this:

(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/step.jpg)

and the description in this ORIGINAL documentation of Stanley Meyer (thanks to Tony Woodside, this is very precious!)

My waveform "zoomed":

(http://xblade85.no.sapo.pt/HHO/zoomscope.jpg)

It seems to have some kind of "step charge", what do you think?

I will replace the transformer with the toroidal one, maybe next weekend and take a video of the tube cell.

My current setup produces low with this transformer, but consumes only 150ma @ 12v.

The scope probe is on X10 mode.

With this setup, the peak to peak voltage is about 50v.

With toroidal transformer, i used 30V input and output peak to peak reached the 300V with good bubbles.

Me scope was on DC mode, sorry.

If i put into AC coupling mode, the 0 (zero)  point stays at middle of the waveform.

Thank you.
But what makes you think that this is the correct waveform?

I looked into Tony Woodside scope pictures and it is different from ours too.

Very confused.

Maybe the propretaries of the stan´s estate should test the VIC as they did publishing a lot of info like schematics and pictures of the original stuff.

Flyback transformers used reversed secondary orientation, and power is transferred on switch off.
If the draw of the wirings is correct, it cannot be Flyback topology, right?

This is what i thought, not as it must be, correct me if  i am wrong.

Hello.
Thank you for asking.

Im using it without airgap.

I believe that air gap is just to avoid core saturation and / or reduce the inductance

i tested the same setup with a toroidal ferrite core with outer diameter of 28mm from car audio amp, with the same windings as on the tv flyback core,
It worked better, but was a b*tch to wind! 

I dont believe at all that Stan's transformers was Flyback topology, but LLC transformer (resonant transformer, that ones that uses separated coil formers, instead of one over another).
See on google: LLC resonant transformer.