According to the Tony Woodside measurements of the mechanical dimensions of the cell tubes, I calculated the surface area of the inner tube (aprox 4.319In^2)
I apologize about that, but I was sincere and a lot of people over this boards know that Ronnie said a lot of nonsense and contradictions, he was making people loose their time and money with crap theories and until today nobody saw his damn cell working. He only wants attention and bear with me for being honest about my thinking. It wasnt me who started do go to the level of name calling, and one advice to you all:
Dont be affraid to say what you thing about SCAMS because some people try to get advantage against the others with less knowledge about this "technology".
I will not take off any word I said about Meyer demo Cells, and about Ronnie.
Edward Mitchell was another idiot like you. Pulling so many power to his cell, creating steam bubbles and calling it Hydrogen. This board have that amazing scientific content...
The only thing that is true is that you can choose to use voltage with low current and pay the price, low efficiency. Thats why Meyer said that cant disprove the "mode of operation using voltage potential".
1st The alternator demo cell: Do some math and you will take some real conclusions, idiot. Calculate how many gas is on a 1 liter cylinder at 7 PSI, look how many amps it was really drawing, Independent test ealuation report said 12.5V*40A do some MMW calculations, now who is the asshole?
2nd Plate cell another scam: Get the data from the same document (2 to 3 MMW not better). Look to the Resonant charging b$hit choke: 2 wires biffilar, look to the pics form Don the way it is connected, the inductances cancel each other, only left the wire resistance. Amp inhibit what? Make some calculations, ohms law! What is inhibit? your brain?
3rd The VIC cards on the buggy: There is no way it was working with that component values on the driver circuit (that resistor I think it was 22k or something). Nobody saw it working and Don confirmed that. You are the smarter man, because people believe in your scams too
Liars like your "close friend" (maybe in the bed) that makes it fun, lol I am not doubting about your work but this guy filled the boards of the pure b$hit and nonsense and you know that. You are hidding it because you and your friend are still interested in scrap some money by your stupid webshop.
Fabio, why dont you go to your lab, test and see if it is right or wrong according to your theories? There are lot of "theorists" and nothing proved right or wrong. There will be no "lc resonance" the way you thing. There is pulsed D.C. not A.C. so there will be no current magnification due to the LC resonance, please read about D.C. resonant charging.
Where are the bench people? Where is the builders?
People are comparing and bring theories to the level of a competition? Please people, go to your lab / bench and test, prove right or wrong, document it, and share if you like. There is a lot of "smoke and mirrors" on Meyer technology. No one saw voltage alone performing work on that stuff. It is time to wake up, Xmas is gone.
Steve our big Steve. Look closely to the circuit in the video and the description of the guy. In that example, you hear the guy saying that inductor collapses because there is no current flowing after the capacitor is fully charged, there was not the power supply interrupted, and because of that, the inductor collapses and the voltage sums to the power supply, then the capacitor has a lower voltage than of the inductor and the power supply in series, that is the only reason why capacitor charges to the double of the charge. If you interrupt the circuit like Meyer does, it has only one power source: the inductor(s). Thats why you see pulse doubling effect on Meyer circuit. I aready showed where and how to read the doubled pulse across the cell: (https://i.postimg.cc/sgrXDqpt/pic-105-4-onoff.gif)
The falling part of the waveform is produced by the inductor(s) collapsing. This is not a real capacitor in my opinion. I only see the water behaving like a resistive non-linear load.
In the example of the video the voltage is always connected, in Meyer system the Interruption of the power source (pulse off time) is what "triggers" the collapsing of the inductor(s).
This is a misunderstanding. The way you get the double of voltage if when a real capacitor fully charges to voltage supplied and there will be no current flow anymore, so the inductor collapses producing the pulse BUT THE POWER SUPPLY IS STILL CONNECTED, and since that, it charges to Vsupplied + inductor pulse in series. In a pulsed system as Meyer with non-ideal "capacitor" there will be a second pulse and not the voltage doubling effect.