if you ionize water big current flow... thats electrolysis does too..
meyer didn't broken the water he turn the covalent bound force off
i'm looking at it at totally scientific way.. how he did it!
i went to study the university of physics just to try seeing if i could understand him... but i also started on wiki and mit opencourseware..
i hope we can contribute somehow to this desperate planet..
remember plants are plants.. . we also need to drink water for our cells to keep going..
but meyer talk about voltage
lets put in this way, in my point of view, is totally different from ionization, the covalent switch off... thats in my scientific view of it... it could also be distorted.
i don't think the your post resume any science... its just lot of ideas... very short thinking
i thought of that too i get platinum and palladium here to sell if you want.. i don't want to use..
well you have right to believe what you want i'm happy with you being someone with good intentions, you are welcome to the forum.. and to believe whatever you can...
in the last link he is comparing meyer to a photosynthesis, that is interesting...but you tell me... if this is not a guess work what i'm Einstein? no... eintein also was guess worker.. just a joke
Nobody who creates ignore lists will ever lead you in the right direction, even less if they had a direction, not even God support this haha.
i would also be really happy to see even Lex Luther driving the water car =)
i don't care about things of the past i do think people can be better... even mr h20p
Of course if we send light our reaction will get favored but is not the light that breaks the bound, this is totally out of question.. according to my theory.. hopefully in the end who puts it to work will prove to be correct.. .
photositesis is a catalyzed reaction not our case... although a catalyzer could indeed be helpful or not..
yes the pulses must accomplish something... question is how and what!
i think he didn't change the technology much.. it seem to me that he improved horvath simply technology and patented 10 years later.. (don't meant to be disrespectful) he used a different approach and probably thats why he was granted patents...
could it be that he where using the diode as a field effect resistor? i mean since the amps are very reduced as the field reverses a certain diode could be match to actually have enough charge from the coils to give it a very high resistance during pulse off but yet not changing the direction of the current?
the higher the resistance the higher the collapse of the field... theoretically... so it would dissipate great deal of power...
nice you talk about that i was just planning on using a spark gap in parallel with a diode... just now.. for my spiral
there are diodes called TVS ... those save the day in parallel with the transistors
but i believe the action of the chokes are also to keep the diode aways polarized so it never switch out or if it switches it has little reverse voltage across it... meyer indeed say it opens the pulsing ckt...
i guess theres just not enough reverse current to give reverse current ...
you know what stan didn't broken the molecule the way he describes..
he didn't created the ionization.. it just happened
in my understanding stan polarized the molecule, this summing with the conditions of the unipolar pulses turns off the covalent bound.
i can't say anything over because i dint finished it... but i would not lose my time into others theories... look at it your own theories! probably will go farther!
The flip flop frequency mixer is very useful since it ,makes only perfect pulses to come out from it, so you can simply use it as a dave lawton circuit.
you could start with that and the gate generator since it generate from 0 to 100% you can use it at the T point (set) and have another frequency generator having 50% duty cycle at the clock point... R
You could use the same configuration of the timer used for the gate generator since it generates 50% duty pulses too... for example..
The pll is should be useful since it can follow frequency changes
There is a pen that you can use to draw directly on the board and than you simply drop the board into an acid that corrode the copper that is not coated with the pen.
My best tip i can give to you is to not perforate the boards... make the traces over the board on the same side of the ics this way you don't need to make the holes and there is less confusion..
Another good idea is to use double layer boards so this way you don't need many wires to jump...
I was trying to do that messing up with the coupling but is much harder...
Incredible
could you explain a little about what you believe is the effect of using this bucking fields?
Just another silly question... the size of the cell matters? I mean you can get the same effect on the 9 tube cell and at the resonant cavity setup with the same trafo setup? just varying the signal frequency and voltage level of both transformers?
Of course i´m assuming you are using two transformers to adjust the relation between the voltages in the secondary and chokes separately
I´m sure you drank the same water we did =)
regard that the saying in this drawing is:
5) Secondary coil winding (8 ) resonant charging chokes (9/12) of similar size and length sets up "Electron Bounce " zone by which the displaced electrons forms copper ions moving and taking on a positive electrical charge entering into resonant charging choke (9); Whereas, the clustering of electrons at resonant charging choke (12) forms negative voltage polarity of opposite electrical polarity intensity.
I would like to add that the variable coil resistor in meyer system must be there for one reason! a resistor decrease the time constant of a coil but increase the time constant of a capacitor. it also restrict the current to a certain limit for a certain voltage applied so the current needed can be compensated by raising the voltage...
In my opinion is used for fine tuning the system for example you vary the resistance and find the balance and than the resistor is sized and applied to the given portion of the circuit aka coils as needed.
I had an idea to fine-tune the cell using an oscilloscope. if you think the center tap as the input and one output is to the cell and the other is to the resonant coil for example. than monitoring the voltage across the coil is possible to balance it to the point it reach a minimum
I aways think about what is the progress and how could it be if those who discover things didn't patented them.
I'm working on old ideas like tay he han and fracture cell and all related again because now i think that i have enough or at least more background to be able to achieve results.
Now i also have a small 3 member team and a lab in the university. Unfortunately we are all very very busy and the project run very slow but keep going.
I'm recently thinking about meyer using the cell like an antena. At frequencies that were not the frequencies that he mentioned.
Way to go, dude! From playing gitar in Italy to a chief master at the uni in brasil
I'm not that master yet but we hope to get there.
Anyway I have a doctor in physics and a doctor in materials working with me. Sometimes is hard to get around thermodynamics and entropy discussions but we are having a good time making models and trying to calculate them.
I think the science will reveal what Stan tried to show to us.
To mention a few i'm working with switching, i'm using two signal comparators to generate a waveform with double frequency than that detected from resonance circuit to send to the switches... at a given phase relationship... This allow me for example to switch on when the voltage or current reaches a certain value.
Electrolysis or whatever reaction to liberate hydrogen and oxygen require a change in entropy, and this mean that if heat is provided the reaction can occur at much lower threshold voltage.
I'm not sure if the tip of the plug will hold that much temperature, specially because water is being insert into it.
My friend mechanic said that they use to inject water into the engine to increase the power in the 80's here, but only a very small amount because otherwise the engine would heat up too much and breakdown. just water
They argue that gasoline serves also as a coolant to allow the normal operation of the engine. I doubt it.
The point is if you insert water at static pressure during the peak of pressure of the engine this may be true because of the increased pressure. but the water should be applied to the wfc injector at at least maybe 12 Bar for today engines.
So we should need a power supply for that. so follow me in my thinking and help me find out why it could not work please !
Didn't the rain drops comes from the water which got heat from the suns energy, than defy the laws of gravity...?
My question is:
Aren't we already using gravity static field reacting with sun heat to generate rain and also energy from this movement?
My question is why it could not be done with an electric field?
I think that if the earth had a bigger mass and rotated little faster there would be rain all nigh long and sun shining every day.
So if we could have a electrically charged rotating globe with some material that under light or heat defy the electric field and when it rotates back to dark it gains energy from the electric field generating power for example "rain in the system".... what could be done? Reinventing Nature? Playing like Gods?
we could argue Well if you could bent a waterfall in such manner as to make the water to take this different path because of the field this mean it won a velocity in the horizontal direction for say, than where this same velocity came from? is the same velocity it has before but just in another direction.... i guess thats why work is zero... to make the water change its path it used the attraction force from the lines of force to reduce the speed in one direction and converting in other direction..
well in terms i think your thought is not completely wrong... but i made this same question to many physicists at my university and they convinced me that as the water moves perpendicular to the field force, this is not work since its defined as force times distance times cosine of the angle between the force and the movement. and cosine of 90 is zero.
It could only do work if the water actually goes in the direction of the field and stops there because if it gets away from the field the integral turns to zero, since it does positive and negative work, do you understand?
I agree that it change the direction but the concept of work is that.
Thats why meyer implied the condition for the statement that electric fields does work for free only if the current is restricted...because if the water get in contact to the source its going to discharge the source of field...
