Hydrocars

so 4 coils around a torroid, where 3 of the coils are 120 degree's out of phase, supposably tuned, "Its called 3 phase no matter the degree's."

The forth coil, Bigger coil, was a current restricting coil, "That was its job."

Simply Put, water likes 3 phase, Why not give the water what it wants? Stan used it! Research EV's and 3 phase please.

Don't forget your series cell, and of course, an calculator. (A Push for 3 phase)

Steve did you even watch the New Zealand Videos?

I did, Do you remember the Part where stan clearly stated he used 180 degree's out of phase for the fuel cell. How about where he Talks about his "Boiler Plate Configeration," Which is the Boiler that was used to run the buggy in the video when he was Stating all of this.

A alternator is 180 degree's out of phase, There is just 3 coils, we call this 3 phase. Its where 3 180 degree out of phase signals Overlap at 120 degree's. 

In other words, if you Research just 1 coil from an stator and not 3, you will see it is 180 out of phase.

Some members of this yahoo group have working geets.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VortexHeatExchanger/

My geet is ready, but need some mountingbrackets. Hope to have it ready next week.

Steve

I could care less what the members of that group claims. However i will respect your word with what you have to say after you are sure you tested everything,,,, My decision is based on what you have to say when you are done testing, Not some group.

Have you got the geet to run on anything yet? Why not just throw some water in there and see if it runs...

If I am correct, and i do think i am a normal Camera can Capture a infrared Beam from your tv remote control. It does seem like I have captured one with a camera before, From the best of my memory, it looked like a laser beam in the photo.

bump

haha, Better be glad I like you! For now, anyways

REMOVED!

An alternator produces a sine wave .

A sine wave is much smoother than pulsed dc , on the scope I can see that this rhytmic motion will do better than pulsed dc . It just makes sense that it would .

REMOVED!

REMOVED!

REMOVED!

Lets say you have a gas uner 13.7 psi, Lets say the Gas in the container is Also hot.

So, we have a hot gas, and is now being released threw a metering device from a 13.7 pressure.


Imagine having a Hose comming from the outlet of the fuel cell valve(Metering device) from the cell container.

Imagine that you light the end of the hose threw a pinhole, Torch. It Flashes Back! Suction is created in this hose, You also shut the torch end off imediatly.


You have just sent a hot, high pressure gas into a line now containing a vacuum at a lower temp threw a metering device, This is the Correct ingrediant for converting gas to liquide.

If one has high pressure on one side and its warm, And suction on the other, and there is a drop in pressure and tempature there at that point, you now have micro liquid drops of hydrogen.

I've seen pure liquid hydrogen. Understand what you're fooling with.

Just my comment.

Warp,

Can you explain yourself?
Just a short, plain suggestion on how you would get electrons into the gasmix?

Steve

Right off the top of my head,
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,1338.msg15047.html#msg15047
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,1201.msg12616.html#msg12616
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,1201.msg12676.html#msg12676

Most of what i've posted was under my old name which has been deleted.

Ok, I went over the first of the thread.

As you all know I had a big claim of ionizing the hydrogen and oxygen, And I failed misserably at replicating it. Later on I finally figured out what I did wrong. When I went to post my findings, As usual it was debunked and overlooked.

I have put an entirely lot of effort, and time into describing how to properly do it, But again its overlooked. I've posted instructions time after time, Still nobody listens.

It is possible you don't have to have any ionizer to alter the gas. In fact, I posted instructions on how to do it about a week ago, And still to this day it is overlooked.

Perhaps eventually somebody will stumble upon how to do it, The realize all this time I already had it posted right in front of your face.

Quote from: haithar on March 23, 2010, 15:21:40 pm

Why do you want to lower the burning velocity in complicated ways instead of altering the spark plug, so that the position is right for instantaneous burning instead of the delayed gas burning?

Because the explosion of hydrogen in stochimetric mix with oxygen is like PFF and no piston got the time to move downwards
Petrol does like this: PFFFFFFFFFFFF. Enought time to start moving downwards and thats what we need.

Thats why you need a slower explosion.....

Stan spoke some on dvd about how the ambient air didn't support a flame, he stated that he used that to slow down the burn rate, and that he could go as low is a piece of paper burning if he wanted because of the non combustible support of the ambient air.

I haven't read the previouse post of this thread, just thought id drop in and respond.

If you could pass Steam over Oil Vapor, you would have watergas, But there has to be ir radiation in the oil vapor.

The biggest problem is nobody here has ever seen the Geet work, There is no solid proof.

Crazy as it sounds Stevie, If you want to harness a Small portion of Infrared radiation Go Buy you A Infrared Detector, Not Transmitter. Hook this To an amplifier circuit with a buzzer, Or light. Buy you a pack of cigarettes and place one near the detector, Take a puff. You will be amazed at the infrared radiation emitted from this.

It is in the works.

Tell me what you want it to do.   I have my ideas  but  I also want yours.

So far a 4 x 20 Back lit LCD Display that can display Frequency, Current, Duty Cycle and Gating.  I could go
with a graphic display,  but that adds about  $20 to the cost plus programming time.   The graphic display would
allow display of actual waveforms.

The user controls can do whatever I program them to do.   The turn knobs are rotary encoders as well
as momentary push button switches.   Pushing a knob in can toggle various modes and programming options. 

So tell me the features that you think will be most beneficial and  practical.   Don't worry I won't laugh at anyone.

Please don't ask for a USB interface  for a PC because I cannot afford the time to write a Windows App.

If there is enough interest and I can keep the cost reasonable,  I will consider building and selling a few  of these. 
Otherwise I will have the only one. 

Goeytex

Right now I am working with the attiny2313 and Nokia LCD. I have also considered the serial LCD from all electronics to be benifentual. The problem i am facing right now is there really isn't a good way to program the attiny's, We use to use the fun card programmer which was a small chip you could make in about 10 min's that only required 3 resistors and a parallel port connector. And a zif socket to release the avr. What I do not know about the attiny2313 is it must be programmed serially unless you use pony prog, and i do not like pony prog. The programming hardware alone runs about 20 bucks but you still have to have your target avr clocked externally.

This is why i've been spending time writing new user friendly software in visual basic. I don't like avr dude. I have currently been working with mscomm in vb. It does not look easy at all, its very time consuming. Perhaps i will give in and use pony prog, but i am unsure of how the fuses work. I dont want locked out because that would cost 10 bucks a mistake.

As of right now, I'm still learning how to activate the avr's internal clock to delete the use of the externall one, since the internal clock comes from the factory working if you know how to turn it on.

What microcontroller are you using, the pic?

233A in? 

?