I will give you a secret. The secret is if you remove the secondary high voltage coil you will be left with a isolation transformer that is center tapped because coil was removed. Now that is a very big secret all done on One core or else it will not work on separate cores
It's a Thnder TG 2001 I have purchased identical one from Singapore yesterday so I can look inside and visually see what resistors needs to be replaced because mine are charged beyond recognition the good part is the parts are easily replaceable as they are not soldered in but in dip sockets but the transistors are soldered in and probably about 10 bucks a pop if you can find them but I will have two thander generators in the end as far as the Vic I cannot really say much that will excite most stans researchers because of the fact of you for one Steven know I was able to put thousands of voltes across a cell unfortunately with Stan's Vic this is not the case here however the input voltage around 24 volts and the input current under 1 amp with a single to you in the very small milliamp range water will bowl into its vapor form and about 24 volts 800 milliamps or so you will see nine excited tubes to the point far greater than you would get from a 12 volt battery direct current however the voltage across the cell is indeed low and the current I did not measure because my scope blew apart around the time on my lead dial it started spinning in circles that was laying up on the test table as the magnetic field grew very great also another reason I did not want to share at this point in time is because the secondary call in my toroid bar so-called heated up to the point it started smoking on the secondary side again I was in the milliamp range
I have a lot of great new information this actually not new at all but very old but needs a lot shed on it now I understand how to generate a electrons push inject them and what a resonant cavity really is. More on this lighter guys I know a lot of what I share doesn't seem like much to a lot here because most of the time I'll share something that's already been done LOL and in this case here yes it has already been. But no one is doing it so maybe after I shed some light in these gray areas it will be great for your understanding and I am sure with what I am about to share here in the next few days will motivate quite a few people here.
I do know scottske diodes are different from a basic diode because the basic diode is a silicone to silicone type. I Scotty died is a silicone to metal not silicone to silicone the downfall is the back EMF voltage is usually 50 volts in the low voltage area. In other words a backward spot can damage those top dots almost immediately however if you look at Stan's patents he used a silicone controlled rectifier to convert this spike. I sensitive and due to voltage as the circuit is Stan learned he could use a auto coupler or infrared transistor to control the scr. If you look at a three-legged Scottsdale that resembles a mosfet or transistor those are ideal but one should read into the data sheet closely as they can handle much faster signals in the waveforms are much more pure. As far as the alternator can be thought of is a super transistor amplifying circuit. When you reach that sweet RPM that we was hitting the alternator takes an amplifies far more greater than the gain of 1000 Hfe transistor. This means it really wasn't exactly the fuel cell that was igniting the alternator but rather the RPM and high amplification of the transformer that I given frequency due to the pulley set up. If we had not inserted the mosfit between the primary and secondary of the alternator it would have locked up completely with a load of the fuel cell the resistive load.
Stevie a twisted ring counter or three phase pulse coil computer controlled with a primary and 3 secondaries can mimic I kinetic spinning armature. With this type of setup Stevie, it is possible for a small computer a primary and three secondaries using a twisted ring counter three-phase method to tap into the same thing the alternator done. Instead of using a spinning armature you would then be using a computer controlled program although the magnetic properties of the armature would be far greater than the frequency itself it would be possible with the fuel cell because they sell itself carries a light charge at all times then you would have to have means necessary to reduce power going from secondary cold traveling to primary coal by use of a mosfit to reduce current flow because this setup amplifies and uses amplification therefore it must be reduced, therefore it powers itself.
The Vic that I was working on currently is nothing more than a isolation transformer with a high voltage coil there in between with a secondary split as bifler chokes, this allows a very small power consumption at its primary and a very large current flow at its secondary. The secondary is not thousands of volts but rather very low votes and very massive amp flow. Try using an isolation transformer at 10,000 Hertz and 5khz. With a shunt capacitor of course and AC type. No diode
Also keep in mind electronics need a few bolts to start working p due to that fact it will be more problematic
I would also like to add Stanley mayor got a patent on his alternator because it was not a over-unity device. it was not over unity because the power consumption of the driver motor. If he had removed the driver motor from his circuit they would not allow the patent to go through. Because then it would have been several hundred percent over unity.
Also, you can see this inductor in quite a few of my recent videos, but, you can not see how I wrapped the coil. I will be teaching the method for constructing such a simply wrapped inductor as well as how to tune it.
I mean, I know how to construct a inductor in such a way it is cold! I have all of that knowledge, imagine a inductor constructed in such a way ju for cracking the water molecule, I am telling you I have the knowledge to do it, and it's not hard and doesn't require any frequency or signal source as it is self resonate and tunable at a very wide range within itself. That is what I will be sharing.
We also have to consider the magnetic curl. The way the flux lines curl around the wire. With a motor, the curl goes one way, and the curls go the other way with a generator.
Can you use the same wire for both the motor and generator?
I have this electric wheelchair that's supplied with two batteries takes forever to charge, it was given to me by an family member because I didn't want to see it scrapped since I valued the batteries and the motor as well as the transmission.
However I would charge the batteries and I would get very short rides out of the chair, it is a very quick chair! I would say anywhere from 15 to 20 mph, the only problem was I could not seem to go only a certain distance down the road out here in the country where I live. I came to the conclusion the batteries were just not holding up which later I found out to be wrong although I was running this chair at the house maximum speed.
About a week or so of piddling with this I noticed one day when I was going down a hill if I let off of the electronic throttle a tad bit the transmission would continue to turn the drive motor and the voltage indicator would peg out indicating to me that the gravity pushing me down a hill was actually charging up the batteries at a massive amount of current flow. I then experimented with going up and down hills trying to be very precise keeping my throttle at the properly tuned place and watching the voltage meter peg out as I would go down the hills even the smallest hills would seem to create a feedback charge. I managed to ride this chair after I learned how I operated for almost an endless amount of time without ever having to charge it at all. When they throttle was turned down like a disabled person would keep it it's not really a problem but there is some sort of gravitational braking system that recharges the battery as the chair tries to stop, if you keep the throttle and the correct position when racing down hills, the chair will supply you with an endless amount of operation time. So yes I would assume you can use the same wire in both a motor and generator.
We also have to consider the magnetic curl. The way the flux lines curl around the wire. With a motor, the curl goes one way, and the curls go the other way with a generator.
Can you use the same wire for both the motor and generator?
and then there is counter torque and cemf. wasnt there someone with a motor/ gen with wire soldered direct to core I just happen to be checking up on atom, copper 29 and Iron 26
Let's assume we have a vertical inductor glued to a table top. Let's assume I connect the bottom inductor lead to the positive terminal of a battery, and the top terminal inductor lead to the negative terminal of the same battery, what pole field would the top of the bar be, and what pole field would the bottom of the bar be?
Please don't cheat and go assemble this, or test a inductor laying next to you. Please use the current knowledge you have on hand. If you're unable to do this in your head that's ok, just be honest and say I don't know without actually testing this. This thread posted here is a very sensitive post so please follow the requested rules, if this is done correctly there will be a reward for a number of members here.
And please each contributing member end your post/reply with a definition for the words oppose, and then initial. Thank you!
From the artic to Antarctica as Question that needs to be answered here on this forum as a test of your knowledge please every reading member here try and explain this right hand rule.
Could one forum member please contribute and step forward with their explanation of this rule to try to explain this rule in your own words to other members to try and gain an understanding of how this rule works. Please do not worry if you have little or no understanding. It is highly expected what follows will be missunderstandings.
After a few post, and a few questions from me I will make a final post that will challenge world arguments. And why such a rule was set into place to confuse you, not confuse the polar bears. As this post is put here to highly educated you in it's end so other members will never be confused again with such a confusion tactic like the sickening one used here to block your mind. With that said, if one desires, feel free to draw on your clear glass boards or even your toilet paper rolls.
Now would any member please step forward and try to explain this theory. And would several other members please follow so that we can complete this thread. Thank you!
I'm glad to hear you are a coder sebo. Unfortunately I code in assembly which I find the easiest understood and the most straightforward not sure where you use. I have written a cold for the atmel AVR in atmel studio and I have been able to monitor a coils Behavior. It is very strange you bring this up because I was going to post this today anyways. This chip I have program monitors a coil and I have found that to get a coil to resonate you have to send square waves only not triangle not sine waves to get the coil to resonate at itself frequency. I would like to share this in case I died or something and I want this pointed out and I want special attention brought to what I am about to say. So please give the following special attention.
When you pulse a coil and you see a ringing wave after the square wave and they are perfect ringing rigs that is that coils resonant frequency. They can call it ringing all they want and teach that it is indeed ringing and not a resonant frequency but I decline 2 agree with such rubbish. As a tester an experimenter I can tell you the ringing frequency is a self resonance they coil is behaving at.
I will also share a coil does not like for the resonant frequency determined by the Bell ringing to be reproduced back to itself it is stubborn like a mule. I have obtained and recorded a coils resonant frequency and replicated that frequency and played it back to the coil to ring that coil and they coil will refuse to respond. I have found that just about a square wave at a very wide range of frequency will cause any coil to ring in this way especially around 100,000 Hertz of a square wave. This is indeed the latest of my findings and I could have never found this if I would have never programmed the atmel AVR are to help me pinpoint where residents is in a coil so this I do share.
I found the following video on YouTube the very start of the video shows you what ringing I am referring to I'm not sure what the rest of the video is about.
I still haven't had time to get back to any post here but I will in time maybe a week or two. I'm deep in politics at this moment and at this time I have poweful people coming into my home monthly and looking around and there's nothing I can do about it. I was told if I gave any trouble or refused anything my children will be put in a foster home and taken away from me so at this time I am being threatened, I am not the kind to let stuff like this slide so simply put I will not be hushed!
I'm sorry guys I have not had the time to properly read over this thread but I will very soon I am busy cleaning up the yard and preparing for more court cases.
Excellent video Brian. Thanks for all the screen shots.
Here's some more math: One Coulomb equals 6.24 X 10 .exp. 18 One mole equals 6.022 X 10 .exp. 23
Therefore, with one electron per molecule, there's roughly 100,000 Coulomb per kg of water, which is one liter. So we need .01 ml of water to get one Coulomb of charge.
But shouldn't you put that coil in a Faraday cage, to rule out an antenna operation, before concluding it's ZPE?
At any rate, the coil produces a biphasic signal. And so will my hairpin capacitor. (Shown in reply #32 on page #5).
I'm not sure at this point, nothing done here is normal. You can see results without a coil it's just far weaker and takes longer. My cell is running all night, has a steady stream now. But it's still a barely visible stream. But it is a stream that's free. I want a faster generator. I can't test above 20Mhz but in running at 1.8 mhz at the moment.
Brian, if i understand your video explanation, you hook up a squareware function generator positive output with one lead to that tiny bif coil and then from there is one wire going to the diodes and cell. I am correct here?
Make it better! It's small scale, get some resonate coils in parallel, start tweaking. I haven't had a chance to look at the driver stevie used. The frequency may can be altered.
