Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Steve

1,613 posts · 384 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Dec 2007 and Dec 2025

An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

The next level:

Hooking up a resistor in line with the negative tube.
This will raise the limite of voltage to 8.5Volts.

The resistor will block electron flow, which sounds ok to me.
Then he states that the voltage over the tubes is not effected by this resistor....hmmmmmmm not sure on that.
Then he states: In the generation of the hydrogen and oxygen gasses to an INFINITE limit, as yet not fully appriciated???? , the upper level of amplitude of the voltage is removed with utilization of the electron inhibitor (resisitor) of fig. 7, which is a sandwich resistor.
He continues:

The advantages of raising the amplitude of the pulses accoording to raising production og hydrogen:
The dual pulse system bring the upper limite to 5.5V or L3 in the schematic of figure 8.

Next step
The Stan is doing someting strange. Instead of connecting all plates or tube in parallel, he just switches between every plate of tube, so that one 1 is connected at the time. This would bring the upper voltage limite to 7Volts

See attachements
Patentnr.: 4798661


What is high voltage accoording to Stan Meyer.
In this patent he names everything above 2V high voltage!
In the voltage schematic, Stan showed different levels:

L1 = 2volt
L2 = 4volt
L3 = 6volt
L4 = 8volt
L5 = 10volt
L6 = 12volt
Ln = ?

He is reducing amp flow by way of limiting the time that the plates get their voltage and amp. A pulsating system.
The reason for doing that is accoording to Stan, that he doesnt want the voltage to drop, as soon as amps kick in and a dead short condition comes up........

What do you people think of this.

br
Steve

Stan used AMPS, big time!

#1 ·

Hi folks,

Well, i am dropping the bom, right now, right here.
Look at page 15 of the pdf viewer or page 13 of his patent.
Line 1 till 10 of that page.

He states:
he hooked up his hydrogen generator to his powersource. ( probably a battery)
Then he used the alternator and hooked it up to that generator and he could compensate the powerconsumtion drastically from his battery.

The question to you all: Do you read the same as i do?

br
Steve

And here is a very nice developed circuit of Mr. Les Banki
Its based on the idea of Bob Boyce.

In this schematic you can adjust all 3 frequencys in sync or just close to sync.
That close to sync would be better...
People build this.

br
Steve

fenedev, you should write a pm or email to passion1. He is a member of ionizationx  and he has contacts with mr les bankie.

br
steve
Do anyone have a good scheme Banki20PWM.jpg, I want to try. This is not happening. The forum http://waterfuelforall.com/forum - this scheme is not.

Precursor Engineering

#4 ·

John,

Most of the devices made for free energy are done with electrical spikes.
So, yes, your theory is plausible!

br
Steve

Website Supporter

#5 ·

Askmehhow,

dont worry about it. Its a proposal from dankie, but not my policy here.
However, i do remove once in a while, members who havent logged in for more then 3 months.

br
steve