Observing a hot point on the cold side of the rod. A cold point is just after this hot point which show that the reaction has inner-reaction high temperature. I mean this hot point does NOT come from exhaust gas high temperature.
Steve
1,613 posts · 384 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Dec 2007 and Dec 2025
An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
found this:
Observing a hot point on the cold side of the rod. A cold point is just after this hot point which show that the reaction has inner-reaction high temperature. I mean this hot point does NOT come from exhaust gas high temperature.
Observing a hot point on the cold side of the rod. A cold point is just after this hot point which show that the reaction has inner-reaction high temperature. I mean this hot point does NOT come from exhaust gas high temperature.
Thank you for sharing this setup Brian.
Maybe some members will pick this up.
Steve
Maybe some members will pick this up.
Steve
hello Steve
it is been a while i know![]()
how much improvement did you get on this technique bemf .
Thank you
Najman
That depends on total setup. Its hard to say.
This schematic was given to RAVI by Aussepom and you all know what Ravi is claiming.
If you are gonna build this, then try to use plates in serie. Or 1 circuit per tube.
Its, because of the impedance. When its too low, you will never see nice spikes on yr scope.
More tubes in parallel, are giving less then 1 ohm! NOT good.
I also suggest that you play with the mark/space. 50% is way too less power in the system.
Well, take some parts you already have and use a big core. I use a MOT primairy coil. Other coils are cut off. Bifilar is better, but 2 single coils work as well.
The result is so depening on the water type too.
Steve
Hi,
Here is a supplier for safety devices / flashback arrestors.
I got myself a model DG (G3/8LH)
Costs: 42 euro = 60 usd
Steve
Here is a supplier for safety devices / flashback arrestors.
I got myself a model DG (G3/8LH)
Costs: 42 euro = 60 usd
Steve
AC electrolysis
#1 ·
Can it be done?
How efficient is this?
How does watermols react on such a system?
Please dump here your opinion.
br
Steve
How efficient is this?
How does watermols react on such a system?
Please dump here your opinion.
br
Steve
Emitting radiation
#4 ·
Crazy as it sounds Stevie, If you want to harness a Small portion of Infrared radiation Go Buy you A Infrared Detector, Not Transmitter. Hook this To an amplifier circuit with a buzzer, Or light. Buy you a pack of cigarettes and place one near the detector, Take a puff. You will be amazed at the infrared radiation emitted from this.
Thats not such a bad idea.
What if we can make a measurement tool with a circuit like that?
Steve
Hmmmm,
Smelly business....
Smelly business....
Stan Meyer effect ?
#7 ·
Haithar,
Yes, you are right.
But WHY does the watercell produce more gas with higher voltage and less amps?
Is it because the Bemf shoots in a lot of Joules (read amps) in a short boost?
Steve
Yes, you are right.
But WHY does the watercell produce more gas with higher voltage and less amps?
Is it because the Bemf shoots in a lot of Joules (read amps) in a short boost?
Steve
Here is an possible explanation on why there is current in a Geet.
The simple explanation is that as the H2O and Butane mixture move across an area that can reduce the Mixture to H2 and Carbon Monoxide then the reformer will create DC electricity with, if its working right, high Amperage. They will need to use scrubbers to remove the CO before it dumps into the atmosphere. But that is a chemical problem not an atomic one like they think. The GEET folks think that atomic reactions are occurring. Instead it is working just like the fuel in fuel cells when they create electricity. Well its like that in a nutshell anyway.
Steve
The simple explanation is that as the H2O and Butane mixture move across an area that can reduce the Mixture to H2 and Carbon Monoxide then the reformer will create DC electricity with, if its working right, high Amperage. They will need to use scrubbers to remove the CO before it dumps into the atmosphere. But that is a chemical problem not an atomic one like they think. The GEET folks think that atomic reactions are occurring. Instead it is working just like the fuel in fuel cells when they create electricity. Well its like that in a nutshell anyway.
Steve
Haithair,
Sorry to hear that.
Well, match components to your setup. For a tubecell, i would say make more circuits. For each 2 tubes one. This because of the terrible low resistance, when you have like 8 in parallel.
Steve
Sorry to hear that.
Well, match components to your setup. For a tubecell, i would say make more circuits. For each 2 tubes one. This because of the terrible low resistance, when you have like 8 in parallel.
Steve
Piezo
#20 ·
Everyone should check this lecture series from Puharich:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oa0bFK6iNI&feature=related
There it is, the 2ndary side transformer identical to Stan´s early circuits, used as a driver for the Piezo circuit of Puharich, Stan really is caught with pants down here.... Note how he explains RESISTANCE is key to regulating the (acoustic) resonance. Tapered cavity is better. Anyway, I believe modified GEET is the best method of ionizing, so I will not dig too deep here yet....
We can all stop debating whether Stan used vibrations or not by now, whether it is Piezo or something else is another matter...
Look at this debate: http://forums.ec.europa.eu/debateeurope/viewtopic.php?p=127696
Similar ideas, this is good stuff.
Hi Gauss,
Thank you so much for these video's! They are very good.
I have read the patents of Puharich many times in the last view years. With help of these videos, it is much better to understand.
In the way he made his tubes with a partially insulation of piezo material, you will have a capacitor.
One you can use in an LC circuit. That way you can easier keep a resonance.
Well, so much to research is it...
First the Geet.
Then find a way to use phonons in comby with electrons...

Steve
more info on how it works. This comes from the Vortex Heat exchanger group on yahoo.
Hi,
It seems that it is possible to use the magnetic field of the reactor to produce electricity / current.
Because the magnetic field is moving, we should be able to pick that up with help of coils.
Steve
It seems that it is possible to use the magnetic field of the reactor to produce electricity / current.
Because the magnetic field is moving, we should be able to pick that up with help of coils.
Steve
Thanks Harald!
Thats good info!
That would be great to try, is it. Create electricity! Looks like to me that the pieces are coming together....
Steve
Thats good info!
That would be great to try, is it. Create electricity! Looks like to me that the pieces are coming together....
Steve
Looking good, Steve.
I read recently, that the device would work much better if it were NOT constructed in a horizontal plane. Have you read or heard anything like that ??
I could do some searching, if that would benefit anyone
What type fuel you usingDid it start on the Geet device, as well as run on it
The photo's are NOT from my engine, but from another Dutch person who already made a Geet.
His photo's and info are so very specific, that anybody can replicate this and can save fuel.
I am going to replicate his work soon.
The fuel used is water and used motor oil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, there is plenty of that, is it.....
Also used is saltwater with diesel.
Or diesel with petrol and water.
Most of the time, it is 80% water with 20% something else.
I seen somebody running this thing on COKE COLA and COFFEE

So, yes. Any help is usefull.
Steve
Here are the basic components of the Geet reactor
Here are the plans of Hydrostar.
Steve
Steve
An alternator produces a sine wave .
A sine wave is much smoother than pulsed dc , on the scope I can see that this rhytmic motion will do better than pulsed dc . It just makes sense that it would .
I have a 300W pure sine wave inverter and with the right plate spacing the gas output is extreme.
Have read that inverters can today have a efficiency up to 95% comparing the input and output.. but the energy in the HHO gas produced is at the moment unknown for me... Didn't Master Steve use a inverter for that motorbike idling?...Hmmm
Master Steve used 2 VIC's with blocking diodes and resonating chokes in where he got LC resonance and he busted water with 40Kv and 1mA, producing a massive 100ltres per second.

But i just forgot how to replicate it..

Steve
Yes, Dudly. I seen those Honda patents too.
The patent above here is talking about using semiconductor material on the electrodes.
Maybe piezo?
The 60ml in an hour is probably the results of the 5mA........Warj
.
Steve
The patent above here is talking about using semiconductor material on the electrodes.
Maybe piezo?
The 60ml in an hour is probably the results of the 5mA........Warj
.Steve
yo steve, when you post a link the msg goes blank! same with pm's!
here is a doc that is worth read, for the sake of what they say about a few topics, from US DOT
Hi Donald,
There is a button on the button bar on the left on de second row. It has a white square in it with a red V
If you use that button, you can add your link in it.
That way, we should not loose any links in messages..
Hopes this helps.
Steve

