You think than we should add all the frequencies isolated from each other?
or you mean like Fm frequency modulation... you canachieve that with a pll too... but you need the modulation signal to be like a triangle ramp or sine....
meyer resonant scanning circuit is interesting but it can find lock and all but it only looks for nice frequencies if we modulate it it can create many harmonics...
Sometimes i feel like i could help, i see only old polititians who are not sticking to the problems solutions but only against one another...
Brazil produces nothing other than base material... we import all we need... only in our trash there is enough money to pay the bill but they dont seem to realize it.
Thanks for the suport man i who likes this kind of atitude too..
well basicaly is what i just said... it reduce the sensitivity of the circuit ...
this opamp i used lm 318 is actually 4mv sensitive so in its case is not exactly a comparator because the opapamp has a back to back diode inside look the small words on the datasheet
this made me change the circuit as i described... i use a 1kohm resistors in series with the inputs and i use a coil in series to get 90degrees dephased signal at the back to back diodes in the circuit that goes before the input resistors to get resonance to lock on high voltage ...the other resistors are 1M feedback and 100k to ground...
the feedback coil and this coil in series form a closed circuit thru the back to back diodes with no resistors therebetween the 5 volt give a reference point so that the inputs wont suffer the input resistor receives about 300mv from the back to back diodes...
its possible to use a capacitor too but i have found that because of the reactances a coils is better to keep the resonance out of the feedback circuit
whithout this change it will work but will not lock well on the high voltage point .. will be aways bellow or above.... or not at all
well there was 11 tubes and 11 vic but i´m talking about anotherthing.. i´m saying that paralleling the vics is possible since it does not sum amps since they restrict the amps... and that it would increase the force of the voltage ...
he could have used all 11 vics for just one tube or maybe 11tubes for 1 vic
the point really is that we get to find the proper frequency and coils sizes for it
the feed back coils and ckt work but need some modification you find in my project section...
the 5v in my view act to reduce the sensibility of the amplifier.... also the diode you see between the transistor and ground also impeed the led to false turn on since the output will not be rail to rail...
what i mean is the chokes being th secondary (pulsed by a primary) and they are conncted to th cell and on th other side to the diode and another coil (not pulsed) closing the circuit ... like reversing where the pulse come ... instead of the (secondary) applyiung a voltag to th chokes.. the chokes appy a voltage on the "secondary" amp inhb coil
=D i didnt meant to attack nor you nor anyone .... is just a point of view of the posture i had and have had having hahah
i think most of us working with huge coils could find the resonance point and when gating it seem just like that.....
i have something new
i have discovered why meyer used more than one vic or had more than 1 there to be used..
the question is not about providing enough current voltage to the cell
he certainly uses in parallel for increasing the force of the voltage fields... like paralleling a magnet.... since amps are restricted they dont add any amp it add only voltage fields at equipotential. but its analogous of having a thicker wire biggr coil...
the greater is the crossection area of the copper the greater is the free electrons available....
so for a same voltage induced a thicker wire would have more oposition to the primary field to maintain the atoms ``ionized " like stan mention than a thin wire... as such it is a bigger charge density formed at the extremities...
remembering magnetic potential is the sum of all magnetic fields..
voltage potential is the sum of all electric fields.. . voltage potential is measure by the force needed to bring this charges together...
Meyer talk about newtons law applied to electric circuit
so voltage is a force within the circuit and amps is what moves like the mass in the commom mechanics... the resistance or power dissipated is the part that does not become kinetic energy or the part that is dissipated as heat.... in the electrical case the kinnetic energy of the charges is the inductive energy amps times inductance... so the capacitance is analogous of a spring where it works by developing an increasing voltage for each electron added..
Last night i made a drawing where the chokes have a commom core and are pulsed... not bifilar... each choke has a parallel capacitor like stan show in the techbrief vic impedance image.
now the chokes connect on both side of the cell one side with the dot and the other not..
than a diode and an external coil (amp inibhiter coil) closes the circuit...
from what i see if the amp inibither coil is there it acts to create the amp restriction and as it reverses its voltage it will sum with the capacitors voltage and create a double pulse...
i was thinking about this cause and effect differences... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ...
i feel like i´m really too much educated when people come show this waveforms talks nothing about it and even claim to have working cells and i stay quiet... i use to call names for very much less than this...
but time makes us more calm...
i can do same waveform as this in 300 different ways...
this mean that if someone show you somthing and dont explain or show schmatic or dont want you to see or understand you should not waste time on it...
i think the water behaves as a dielectric at a certain frequency,,, meaning it allows the coil to overcharge the molecules with electrostatic potential...
your osciloscope is analog... may not be bad.. but a digital one is very good option as it is a multimeter inside with multiple functions.. .
diferential probe without proper shield is unreliable.. i wouldnt lose time on it.. try to get the real one is simpler....
i´m using the same tubes as meyer one is a 0,5 inch x 4 inch rod having the holes and being longer than the tube which is 2,75 inch long
its all over... the tubes i got from onlinemetals.com the rods i got and machined here inbrazil
all 304 material seamless tubes ks
in the prototype i´m currently using thereis two sets isolated from eachother and having water in each separated from each other of course... and the electrodes were polished and left over night on citric acid 10% concentration
i believe the cell is a conductor of dielectric field.. .simple as that.. .
Good one! nice to see you are willing to grow up together with us! I will try to finish my PLL board to share too.. than anyone can have it too just in case...
i´m willing to learn arduino a lot also for other projects and now i´m able to get one....
i have a friend in florida who is helping me too learning about this digital world and maybe he can if he want help this process too.. i will talk to him what is his disposition too..
Obrigado
Partnering up is the way to get bigger and bigger...
did you saw his patents? i mean john quincy st clair?
he show some formula... he proposes that using a combination of fields is possible to calculate in a matrix the curvature generated.. and he says it can be used for thrust and other means
all based in his wormhole generator apparently
is hard to tell how he got this stuff patented talking about contact with other civilizations etc,,,
but i understand what you are saying GEON but i also think maybe theres more than what books tells apparently.. we should try to match some of the hard science knowledge with this claims to try understand whats going on.. when i got back to Brazil and into the physics university was for this reason.. meyer talked the language of science and it seemed the most reasonable way to learn it.. and perhaps understand something more.
if patents never exists maybe we would have time machines by now =D
When I did some tests feeding the cell with dc current thru a coil i was expecting that when I applied ac on the cell thru a capacitor would have mixed the electric fields in the cell however kind of it just worked in parallel being the cell connection just the point where the two circuits meet.
I was expecting that when I modulated the cell positive the choke would reinforce it and if negative the choke would absorb it.. it did it but not as much as I wanted.
When a coil find a higher resistance it need to develop a higher voltage to keep its current flowing so my idea was perhaps that maybe one coil modulating each other could give rise to a high voltage or field when they interfere with each other