about the barbosa patent i think that could be simpler than we imagine... i think the idea used this principle...
here we get two 110v volts two phases and ground... when the energy comes down the line they are connected to ground too so its part of the circuit.
lets suppose we had a 1:1 transformer connected to its phases ... so i have now 220v insulated from the source...
now just connect this 220v to 1 antiphase and ground what you get is 110v but whatever current you consume will go in opposite direction on the clock meter...
if it were an step up it would also work... because the load current must pass thru source in backwards direction.. or thru the same primary adding to the original field as a positive feedback..
ex/ you have an 220v source and a stepup transformers simply connect the secondary and primary on one side in phase and the load across the other side of secondary and the other primary side...
probably the side effect is that this current must pass thru the network output transformers... (those are step down so should already be rated for high current...
if you would buck the voltage you would be paying for lot more electricity than you used for example...
thinking about the EPG meyer used charged particles set them into movement to get energy..
electrons in this shorted coil seems to me like the same
maybe i'm just confuse.. may that only trick the clock? i don't think its free energy there might be something missing..
this brazilian patent makes a citation about stanley meyer patent about the magnetized particle electrical generaotor...
it just led me to one question...
Any of you have an EPG constructed?
what if you put 100 amps on the copper tube... and kind of use magnets to polarize the electrons... as they move can't they now generate current in a coil perpendicular to it?
the problem with insulation is one... it will limit the current you can apply to water to get it charged... the advantage is that it accumulate charge and this can than be used to break the molecule if proper circuit is used... ex.. fracture cell... of course the higher the dielectric the higher will be the ability to polarize water but whatever dielectric will do this screening process leaving you with the need to use several thousand volts to get over the insulation screening. a metal won't screen e fields for example...
i constructed 2 fracture cells few years ago.. .but could not get over the high ozone production...
basically when you have insulator and conductor you get an interface problem when you use high voltage...
basically as you reach a voltage where corona happens the insulator will hold this charge and will be little hard to discharge it.. . since the charges flew away from metal...
what can be done is to metallize the insulator on both sides granting the good touching of the electrode and insulator... this way the air inside won't get ionized.. another approach now i know would be to fill with oil..
an insulator allow a high current to flow initially than it will restrict this current... if you revert it it will create a high current peak..
an inductor initially impedes the current to flow fighting against it with a potential to not allow current to flow... when current stops the voltage is reversed...
in a transformer you can get other coupled inductors that will create a potential copying the potential of the first coil but also allowing to connect in reverse.. also it provide insulation..
i was thinking about a brazilian patent that mention meyer...
they seem to use the same idea of the chokes to steal energy from the electric company...
basically a transformer that steps the voltage in a sense that if you connect in series with the plug makes your bill value go backwards..
they say they capture electrons from earth...
i'm almost sure they step up the voltage and use the line to connect the system so the clock run backwards since current is flowing in the other direction...
electrotek, voltage if used as meyer said should break the molecules because its really strong field... the salt only problem is that it will keep increasing the concentration as water rapidly is consumed changing the parameters.
Meyer complete solution to this was the injectors.. a kind of powerful fuel cell that water only gets in and completely flush out every injection cycle...
from my understanding salt or other electrolyte is maybe a kind of good for the reaction except for it break the laws of economics creating waste products which are not desirable... as per stan words mentioning horvath in same video...
today i got a meeting 5 hours with a transformers factory owner... they made for me some coils... but i ask him about this diodes he never heard about... he used pin diodes only at very low power ckts..
one interesting thing i noticed is that this coils when pulsed in a transformer are made to oscilate stronger at its self resonant frequency and its proportinoal to the oscilation of a half wave string... moment of huge stress than zero stress
Nice one, i made one with a c core inside a case with electrical connections... i use a bolt to change the inductance... the coil is fixed in a way the its half fixed to one of the cores...
i used pieces of antena to make it slide perfect and springs to make it very fine tunable..
In my case i connect it to a tap in the choke... and the "isolated ground" point...
with my pll i was able to change the frequency of the resonance by changing this value and the pll followed and kept at resonance without changing any other button... i could vary in one test from 65khz to 110khz...
TGS you are making mistakes again posting in this topic, there is another split "who is right discussion" on the forum. lets discuss some point of view
Right, lets back to subject
xBlade can you make some more clear scope shots? i could not really see what you have going there..
Here is a scope shot showing it work good at 60Hz at channel blue 2, both probes are connected to 360vpp line also the probe at the first channel so we know what is the peak...
so if the signal is peak to peak 360vpp and it gets 1,6vpp noise or error in the differential signal this mean an error of 0,44%
the problem really seems when it gets to higher frequency... i think i can try adding a potentiometer to one of the leads and try to trim out this..
another thing is that i needed to couple the probe with AC otherwise it will show a dc bias over that apear as a noise in measurement and this is about more or less from 550 to 650mv at 200x division ... and 450mv at 2000x division... independent of the where the probes are connected or not
Do you noticed it does your probe show this behavior or not getting to zero volts if not connected to nothing using dc coupling of the channel?
i know it seems a stupid question.. but may help me know if mine is working well...
so do you couple it to the oscilloscope using the dc mode or ac and if dc does it show zero when not connected to measure but turned on ?
i don't think Stan ever used a wrong terminology... Stan was a man of science and very high level for what i observed.. He has develop an argumentation to be able to patent it and keep it from who dont have the same knowledge base of his to be able to understand what he was doing.
I started a physics course to get to known in the language of science... without it could even be here telling you that my felling was very strong and i was in the right direction and all but truly, of course if i´m now a physics guy i know more than i did before studying it and my felling isn't much worst after all. maybe i´m little older and slower but never dumber haha
when you get your both probes leads connected to the same point in the circuit there should not be any signal... but anyway there is a noise... if you get 1000v from cell to ground and place both leads at the 1000v pulsing how much noise you get on the differential signal?
i have something real not good to work with... thats why i shield my cell trying to get rid of it.. did your is shielded like mine?
Cool X blade... good to see someone portugues on this too!
i´m trying to find how it works man we are all trying and we may do it if we are in the right mood!
I glad you could see some that i wrote and that it makes sense to you.
I agree with the fact that meyer gave lot of contradiction for us to work with, but i went to university to try reach his knowledge base so i could understand what he was talking about..
almost 9,5 years of work, and most here also from the same time or so... i believe this is because the internet boom after the year 2005 and so people like us could know the existing Stanley meyer story! Some were already educated in the field of sciences and wasn't ready to learn more and left it go... others still keep strong and don't let it go. Also some have less knowledge but a so big heart and will to learn that it compensates it. I´m saying that no one is better than me and i´m not better than anyone here... for me i respect all the efforts of all the people evenly as i want to get peoples respect when is my time.. Of course some people need or deserve a little more attention as they claim to have theories and show some of their excellent very beautiful work like many did and so my action is to be here and listen and learn what i can just the same. I also have my theories which i tried to silently public release but i got no much answers on it.
For example one of my theories tell me that the cell should charge to make alignment of molecules and than the potential must be simply reversed fast enough to allow the reverse polarization of the electronic clouds of the atoms turning off the covalent bound! ...this is the explanation of meyer in the newzealad... the oxygen become negative and repel the covalent electron...hydrogen gets positive and attract the electron...
it only makes it worst to live without so lets talking about it
Hello xBlade i can generate 10kv and up pulses dc with that diode without letting it burn... i know that because i can draw a huge arc and only one side of the arc gets hot! meaning only one side is receiving electrons to heat up...
the reason why it don't burn is that the chokes and secondary plays different roles..
the choke coil don't let current to reverse or even change so fast so the diode wont see the peak reversal voltage of the secondary...
look how a microwave diode works and put a coil in series with it and you will understand what i mean..
it allows a capacitor to be charged positively from ground potential making that when the secondary reverts the capacitor and coil sum potentials to negative kv range and forces the electrons thru the magnetron... this diode act as a blocking diode...
The cooking place of the microwave oven is a resonant cavity (i mean where you put the food)
electrotek i think i understood your idea,, thanks you a lot i will give it a try... but if the resistors aren't exactly the same how do i manage to it? if i increase capacitance from one side it should get unbalanced,, ? do you think is possible to build with a single rail power supply?
if i undestood well the final resistance should be 1000 ohm ? for the opamp sensing side? in series with a 20Mohm ? so how the output of the opamp become 50ohm impedance?
i have almost 1000 friend in facebook still no one donated... i didnt apealed much though.. maybe i should... i will tell them i´m going to suicide and they will have to live with it for not having helping me...haaa
i believe there are corporations looking what i wrote everyday, i doint think they would post anything though so should not be our people comenting... i guess
i´m not paranoid anymore... my car has got the breaks cut few time ago and i could have died...
its not that i´m saying it was because of the project... but who the fuck knows?
in my honest will i hope if they are reading they can see i´m much more of value live, as i dont want to break any rules.. i just want to play the game...
its 38 dollar for the barrel today...
i really thank your effort and you should know i do the same... i lost 20kg in the last 2 years
i agree if people could dont eat a burger once a month it would be enough for donating... 100 people would do...