With standard electrical components (capacitors, resistors, diodes transformers and logics) it is only possible to get 8.5 volts in the water fuel cell without causing amps.. sure you can get 45 but there are amps.. Sure you could put a capacitor in series to restrict amps but then you are isolating electrically.. Sure you could connect a resistor in parallel with the capacitor but does it give the same effects as figure 7 under a load? no.
First comes understanding Stans plate resistor (uniquely made electrical component), then comes the rest of the conventional parts.
Column 8 Row 65
"In generation of the hydrogen and oxygen gasses to an infinite limit, as not yet fully appreciated, the upper level of voltage level is removed WITH the UTILIZATION of the ELECTRON INHIBITOR of FIGURE 7"
The voltage level is 8.5 volts MAX with conventional parts without leakage of amps. So if you want to get higher then 8.5 volts it would be wise to take stans statement as true..
Its like the answer is in front of you but your still on a path ignoring this fact as if it weren't true..
A circuit simulator wont show you the answers.. It doesn't have the option of adding Stan's unique component into the simulator..
I have to say that, stan was not a stupid he was very speciaslised scientist in contrary to what seemed, because he knew that anyone with enough knowledge would be able to understand and repeat what he was doing, the way he hided his secretes was a tentative to protect him against those with knowledge in the prior art;;; I aways knew that the knowledge was the way... I´m not a chemist not a physicist, not a mathematian, i´m a musician and a scientist, i studied so hard in this 5 years about hydrogen, water, energy... that i can tell you, i don´t find anyone not even in the university that speek my language, they are aways busy with their lifes, i believe those are not scientists, they don´t even want to understand...
seems most lack the mindset to approach such knowledge.. like you said they are to busy... in our minds we see it as if we dont try to change this now we are gonna be stuck in a life of resistance ..having to jump though corporate loops to maintain which is nothin more then lack of self sufficiency.. disconnecting all middle and lower from being sovereign beings!
keep going seb! im interesting in hearing your results!!! be patient and double check your work. sometime being in a hurry we can over look somthings which can lead to no results while having the correct idea..
what i think is the pic above would allow the cell to have direct connection to rectifier and the scr would gate positive to ground.. i think there may be a way to allow scr to dead short to ground to allow cap discharge rather using scr to send charge to fuel cell.. i think there is a way it will improve switching with scr then what stan shows..
you cant compare time with batteries in series... doesnt make sense we are not viewing consumption we are viewing available potential at a given moment
12v @ 100 amp 2v @ 100 amp
we must know the siemens!!
100amp/12v= 8.333 100amp/ 2v =50 we take the highest resistance which is the lower siemens (8.333) and times it by the new potential in series
14vx 8.333= 116.662 amps! 14v @116.662 amps
the reason we choose the lower value siemens is because it has the highest resistance..
which sounds more resistive? a gain of 8.3 amps per volt in a given material or 50 amps per volt?
its obvious a material that gains less amps per volt is more resistive..
now lets reverse the idea of resistance between the 2 batteries
a 12v 100 amp in series with a 2 v 1amp
this in series provides the following equation
100amp/12v = 8.333 amps per volt. 1amp /2v = .5
now we have a battery that es really weak and one semi powerfull in series
the difference is in the first example steve gave the higher potiental (12v) battery was that battery of most resistance which gave us the numbers to go by.. (14v x .0833siemens) gave us 1.1662 amps
this way we have a high power forcing 12 extra volts to flow through its resistance.. this i would think would over load the material of the battery to the point of burning up.. if the smaller batter could handle the current then it would be the following
you would take the simen of least value which represents the value with the smalled vaule of amps per given volt..
it is .5 siemens for the 2 volt 1 amp battery..
14v series x .5 simens =7amps..
so the small lower power battery should try to maintain around 7 amps until a it burns up or B it can handle the load which may be simple a construction parameter to achive
notice your mistake seb.. 1 amp is inacurate because you not accounting for the 2 extra volts being superimpsed onto the 12 volt battery!!:) that 2 volts raised the amperage of the 12 volt 1 amp by .1662 amps! (volts out power resistance raising amps as volts go up in ANY material conducting) man i feel like i gain the key to the universe lol i can see the ratio for acceleration of signal in a medium now..
we must learn drift velocities of electrons.. we must refraim from the example of amps in reference to how may electrons pass a given point to how fast they travel in a medium under different potentials.. need to know how long the travel from a to b is in the cell gap..
if they were in parallel wouldnt your 12volt battery charge the 2 volt battery to the point where the 12v it dead and only holding 2 volts? a negative 12v hooked to a negative 2 volts would that not create current of 10 volts @.833 amps flowing into 2 volt battery? (10v x .0833 simens)
if you were to pull a load you would have 2v @ 100.833 amps?
the 12v and 2 volt will gain the total of series being 14 volts they will superimpoise there resistive qualitys.. the one amp batter haveing higher resistance will regulate the voltage you will have a total potential of 14 volts @ 1.1662amps
i think you would simply take the most resistive value and and times it by the series 14v x .0833 siemens= 1.1662 amps
seb and everone else
also with the 3 phases combine you are not getting a pulse frequency in the cell without gating... the 574.77hz my alternator is producing is rectified dc.. 3 signals superimposed (3phase) will give you dc ripple of frequency..
seb i dont think you understand the alternator clearly.. or maybe i dont
the way i see it is the alternators frequency is based of of geometrical shape.. if you look the rotor it has claw poles coupleing from front and back of the rotor.. one is north and one is south... 6 north poles and 6 south poles.. one turn of the rotor in 1 second is 6 hertz.. swings up and down in 6 reps
2 turns in one second is 12 hertz and so on,, 1rpm would be .1hz..
if 1 turn in 1 second is 6 hertz then one rpm is 60 times longer then 1 second (the hz measurment)
ok i did the measurments on my alternator.. it has a 5 inch pully on a 220 volts 3450 rpm 2hp motor.. my alternator has a 3 inch pully.. this is a 3/5 ratio or a 5/3 depending on perspective.. is glass half empty or full? you could say that the alternator turns the ac motor 3/5 or you could say the ac motor turns the alternator 5/3
5/3= 1.666 so for every 1 turn of my ac motor my alternator pully turns 1.666 times
if my motor is 3450rpm it is also 57.5 cycles per second.. (3450/ 60= 57.5) 57.5 x 1.666= 95.795 so my alternator is turning at 95.795 cycles a second which is 5747.7 rpm
if my rotor produces 6 hertz per turn then 95.795 cycles per second will produce 574.77hz signal from rotor to stator..
i think im gonna join yalls ban wagon and try to feel what sebs trying to do... i remember stans vids and from what i remember about eec.. it switches on during the off time of voltage to the cell and the discharge of current would be used to generate light (consume electrons ).. i didnt know there was another coil for the eec...i thought stan simply conumed the negative voltage as light... which in return was used in the cell.. when you have a series of leds wired up and connected as it they were the coil you speak of.. fill me in a lil more why u feel this is the way.. if you decide to use around 18 gauge for tha alternator i know 6 loop per inductor is a bit much.. will want somthin like 3-4 per loop... the thing is 3 loops is 6 because loops over lap in the cavitys of stator.. so with 6 per indunctor you get 36 in each cavity.. (realy tight with 18).. this is how i have my alternator at the moment..
if you sent the negative of all three phases to the primary like my last picture.. you gain the oppourtunity of using the electrons to generate the magnetic field of primary...this i think you may consider simple pll for a forced oscilator (alternator)... it allows your magnetic field of primary coil to amplify during the peak of each phase.. if you connect negative output choke to primary think of how in tune primary will be with three phase.. the negative charge has 2 choices when primarys gate to ground is off.. it can cross water to the postive plate or it can run though the primary to produce magnetic field.. both of them having a resistance.. would the perpetual rotation of the rotor allow you to magnify a echo (the feed back that is in sync with the 3 phases) so lets say you first have to gate a on time to connect ground to primay for a pulling initial magnetic field and then every time you gate on it allows the negavtie potetial to dead shot and fall to 0v this will prevent amp leakage into water.. you would tune into that specific frequency which dead shorts the cell threw ground.. the negative voltage of tube discharges to ground since it is the path of least resistance compared to traveling through primary and generating magnifying field??? this is all dawning on me clear as well i can see the posibilities of this.. but who knows until they experience.. i will find some time to try this approach in the near future.
Negative electrical voltage potential (61) of pulse wave (65a xxx 65n) of Figure (3-21) is simultaneously applied to negative voltage zone (67) via Resonant Charging Choke (62) of Figure (3- 22) which is electrically linked to opposite end of Primary Coil (26). The resultant signal coupling ( 65a xx 65n ) of Figure (3-21) is accomplished since primary coil (26), pulsing core (53), secondary coil (52), switching diode (55), resonant charging choke (56), resonant cavity assembly (170), natural water (68), and variable resonant charging choke (62) forms Voltage Intensifier Circuit (60) of Figure (3-22), as illustrated in Figure (3-22) as to Figure (3-23). Negative electrical ground (61) of voltage Intensifier circuit (60) of Figure (3-22) is electrically isolated from primary electricaI ground (48) of Figure (3-22).
pulse wave (65a xxx 65n) is simultaneously applied to negative voltage zone via Resonant Charging Choke of Figure which is electrically linked to opposite end of Primary Coil
Negative electrical ground of voltage Intensifier circuit is electrically isolated from primary electricaI ground
sounds kind of contradicting when u here isolated all the time..
i think i made a mistake on my first drawing.. the connection is from the negative output to cell to the negative side of primary while having the cell driver circuit isolating them at the same time.. during the on time of driver circuit.. it is dead short and primary will not pull more then the load it wants 12 v.. when it is off the electrons runnign though primary are forced without a choice.. (isolated) cant go to ground and need to go somewhere.. will be making new pic
you are showing 18 inductors when there are 9 in the stator.. there are 18 connections (begining and end of each wire) curious to why you show 18? im glad to see you are approching the alternator seb..
check out this picture.. it is how i see it.. i am only showing 1 phase of the whole picture.. controllable amplitude on positive side.. while you have a isolated ground "that can be switched to non isolated" this one i think would be the resonance of the resistance of water.... while you have T2 which would be the 50 percent duty cycle and maybe resonance of the circuit.. then you have the switchable analog or constant.. this is where you can vary amplitude to vary production..
here is a example of stan meyers voltage intensifier circuits output pulses going out of the tip 120 to the primary..
the gate simply controls the duty cycle of the resonant pulses produced by the phase lock circuit.. this circuit based on stans component allows the gate circuit to operate with a frequency range of around 1-40hz while the pll has a range of up to around 20khz..
So when scanning the gate signal remains constant.. when the pll frequency climbs then the number of pulses per gate on time grows... As frequency drops the number of pulses per gate on time drops..
in the pic you see the red scope shot.. it is the gated pulse output going into the 4001
then you have the yellow which has the pll pulses that are being gated on and off by the gate circuit.. notice how they match