Dankie

somebody brging me proof of this from the papers.

Too lazy now .

I have heard of this , if this true .

That meyers was gating and pulsing with 2 transistors , one at the negative side of primary coil and one at positive side .

Somebody plz brg this up from the patent I I can maybe put a possible add-on for this , Its just a slight modification .

ok maybe , it has merit .

Too much foir me tho , too high tech .

I dont know much about crystals ...

nah , I dont think so ...

So I hear about diode layer this , diode layer that ... Naudin puts a ''thin adhesive film' on the  negative electrode .

Radiant says on positive electrode , ravi says positive electrode . ( this is all very confusing )

This ravi conditionning is a big waste of time , there must be a better way . Cant we 'emulate, a diode layer with something simpler  ?

http://www.youtube.com/user/wwwshark

The process itself is called : electro spray ionization

It is used is mass spectroscopy .

http://www.newobjective.com/electrospray/

There was a patent allowed for a fuel injector for  gasoline that revolved around this . Let me remember that patent , I made a post of this on OUpower.com

It was a replacement for the spark-plug and was itself a spark plug at the same time .

P.S. If anyone has a copy of a video I made a while back where I pulsed an ignition coil with a 555 and captured charge on one wire and discharged a xenon bulb....I have lost it and would like it again.
It is another example of resonance....and in fact i made a companion video showing the standing wave all my house and in my oscope w/o a connection made!!

This is very interresting indeed . Plz tell us more . You saw a wave on your scope with both negative and positive " same voltage " the same moment in time . Kinda like figure 10-5 of the tech brief 

So I`m trying to imagine the tube cell was wires . So the B flux lines must be opposite spins in teh cell  , And their ``direction`` must also be opposite  Perhaps the middle point is the ``zeropoint`` where the fluxes meet and this cause ``interference patterns`` in that zero point zone where the water is 

Could the B fluxes be opposing spin polarity BUT be going in the same direction  I mean they are mutually going towards a point in space with the opposing B flux  , maybe the injector works like this Somehow I cant imagine this with a bifilar tho... Th B spin is dependant on direction right 

roflmao

awesome video dankie.. loved it..

Dam !

Those videos are cool 

Maybe the upper coil has the crux-wfc connection with a diode ? Lets say the upper coil is isolated from the chokes and somehow theres a combination of this "efficient voltage" and non-voltage aka ""squeezing""

We are not specified anything about those secondaries "copper chokes" ...

Remember that Stan was a tester ... he tried every single coil shitz ...

10-4 is made to go on an e core , you could experiment thats 4 sure ...

These 6 videos that were posted are amazing ...

http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,1009.15.html

So he pulsing the primary with a 555 timer , but he needs to rectify this signal , so this is more like an AC square wave ? I am a bit confused by his pulsing method . Perhaps somebody with more experience can explain a few things to me

I'm curious as to what he means , "when you brg positive and negative together" ... Perhaps he was mixed up and its just a pulse dc ??

Here are my ideas . Would it be possible to have resonance with both circuit ?

I have heard from many different people that the opposing bifilar connection does have a resonance frequency and the voltage will rise up @ a certain freq , but its shadow wave will also have the same amplitude and block it .

But what if the pink coil can also resonant with the wfc/coil , perhaps this pink coil could be fed by  HV transformer ? What if also we can add a lightbulb after the diode coming from the pink coil , seems like it can be an EEC as well ... ??

Seems like it could be pretty flexible setup and an ez add-on to the jolt circuit  , some photo-transistor or w/e ... if we have a solid diode , a good 20$ diode .

We have to think how to "move" the water molecule ... We need to evolve our thinking .

Alsso , can somebody answer me this , how will these magnetic fluxes be ing when they are coming from 2 choke wires to cell , from this angle . I am not sure of this .

Pretty interresting outlaw video outlaw , the twin vortex video ...

Dam , that stuff is everywhere . And I'll be damned is Meyers tech doesnt follow this process ...

If only we know how hustchison effect worked . Theres so much mystery surrounding this , shit is really really really subtil ...

Its probably not "high voltage throught air dielectric" ...

What is it then ...

Extremely mysterious ...

Is this related to John Kanzius I wonder ...

In this interview , there is a mention os Stanley Meyers , but also a nice story about current world affairs .

http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=60_Docs&page=1&sublevel=0

So I have heard of something called "neutrinolysis" , coinded by our friend Konstantin Meyl .

Heres the page , problem is that the ducument (#70) , is missing ...

I need to read about "neutrinolysis" .