I did an post on what I thing Stan did . My opinion is that his designs were still in the works . Reading all this again I find it less and less conclusive as to how the charge exchange occured with the Steel . I think he was visualising and explaining his theories and ideas . It certainly follows a straight arrow logic .
So there is a difference between the two , a difference I dont fully understand the point of but still ...
Is this the EEC ? It seems to me like Stan was sourcing the current , into an undefined load/ground/electrons from gas .Still do not understand how this makes a ground for current to flow but what do I know about ionics right ? Maybe really weak and distant electrons will flow to the positive ?? Then once they make their way from the cavity to the lightbulb ( electrons travel from from - to + , they are - ) they are trapped there , because of diode ?
Multiple LEDS are also on while the positive pull is on .
Did anybody ever think of using a p-type mosfet for this ? Lets say a few nanoseconds before the gating off time , the gate off time , not the off time between pulses ? could easily be done ...
How could we simply use the EEC with simple semidonductor and proper timing ?
The electrons are negative right ? We want to pull out the negative electrons to stop the gas from reforming quickly after the hv ionization tickling etc...
even if you think that stan is still alive you should still be respectfull of his family and others and stop saying his cold dead lifeless body it just not polite
W/E ... Stan or Stephen wont be reading these posts .
I need to be sure that he died the way they say he did .
here is a circuit for you , unfortunately I dont have the circuit for that ramp ave lol , I usedto just google it andalways find it , all rampe wave generator circuits are gone when googlin .
op amp should be an op amp made for dc powr + and ground pins.
Let me go and check my page , I linked it somewhere .
I am familar with those ramp circuit , that is how I had genius idea of making a phase shifter .\
What I did is I delayed reference 50/50 square wave by 90 degrees with a xor and flipped flopped it and had a square wave right in the middle of that wider ramp , wich was synched with the wave that formed that 90 degree late wave . I would then connect a comparator to that circuit and choose my treshold lvl , I could choose between 45 degress before the starting edge and 45 degress after the falling edge . That was my f/2 , I did the same thing for f/4 .
Problem was that things dont always go so nice in reality , noise can cause late or early threshold , it was unstable . Just breathing on it can cause it to jitter .
o that ... well thats not easy to do at all with much amps trust me , things can get messy with even 5 volts logic pulsing a 12v transistor . You can probably make the signal @ low power on a breadboard without too much problems ...
Thats why I use all cmos with my pulser , all @ same pressure , much less problems .
What happens is that analog signals like sine wavea and op amps and digital signals dont like to me mixed for some reason , they need seperate ground return paths , and the power circuit needs also his own personal return path . They can all share the same +Power path tho , as long as its big and low impedance . And they need big return paths with low impedance (inductance) .If you tried to amplify that wave @ much amps you could start seeing some digital noise right on your wave . I am an eye witness to that phenomenon .
So what do you mean outlaw by analog signal and digital signal .
Pulses are considered what again lol ?
That would mean 2 mosfets in series .
To me that makes no sense , there is only one on the ground side . Komtek had the same opinion but its just bizarre , anyways my logic permits that by a switch of a wire lead .
But running 2 mosfets in series can get noisy .
IMO If there is no current there is nothing , its just a bunch of mumbo jumbo .
I think I see your plan Steve. If you have a HHO supply under pressure; heating it (with waste heat) will increase the pressure/volume. If you have enough pressure/volume the piston will be driven down on the intakestroke by said pressure! This will give you an extra small power stroke! It will also overfill the cylinder, like a turbo, compensating for volumetric efficiency losses on the original power stroke and negating all my previous arguements. Heating the H2 will also change more of it into Monatomic H. This gives a further increase in volume and increases the energy given off by igniting it.
Very Clever! Or is it me being very clever!??
The fact that H has a higher octane rating (does not pre-ignite at higher compression ratios or in hotter conbustion chambers) means that ther should be no issues with knock. You may have to beaf of your cooling though.
There is no way, at this point, of producing enough HHO onboard, but there is no reason why one could not set up a wind, solar and waste/p**p powered cell at home. http://www.green-trust.org/wordpress/ There are cells out there that produce HHO and pressurise it at the same time; easily found by Googling. The tech to fill gass bottles is commercially available.
That would be a great initiative to do that , HHO meyer style is more of an hobby for the already smart and energy independant guy .
