@uz
UZ,
I gave you the distinctions here to help you:
I told you the difference between over 1.0 cop and overunity.
Your argument is nothing new and has a fundamental flaw.
There are MULTIPLE over 1.0 energy devices throughout this entire forum.
Most people are simply unaware of how to recognize one if they saw it.
Bedini's sg has been over 1.0 from the beginning but most people didn't
have the sense to understand it. If you can recover 90% into another
battery WITHOUT EVEN INCLUDING THE MECHANICAL WORK and then
you do consider the mechanical work of 20% for example, that is
cop 1.1
If you charge a bank of 4 batteries on the back end with one on the front,
and when the front battery is down, put it on the back and take one
one the back and bring it to the front, and you keep doing this cycle,
all the world you get is WAY OVER 1.0 cop and again, most people don't
even know how to analyze what is there.
The attraction motor is over 1.0 cop.
I was the first to show over 1.0 cop with the Rosemary Ainslie circuit,
which it is over 1.0 cop. I showed both overunity AND over 1.0 cop.
I did this not only with a 10,000 sample per screen sample with exported
data to a spreadsheet to prove the #'s, I also did it with battery draw
down tests showing MORE joules of work in heat produced that what left
the battery. The protocols that I followed ARE the protocols that were
designed by British Petroleum (BP) to validate and certify her original tests.
I didn't get 17cop they BP certified, but enough to prove the concept
is valid.
If you don't understand a bouncing ball is over 1.0 cop, then you will
have a though time ever seeing what potential even is.