Meyer hho
HairBear wrote:
I have experimented quite extensively into this matter and have found that there was never any oxide layer on any of Stan Meyers devices. The devices still exist and have been examined for the oxide layer which is not present. The oxide layer is more of an indication of current leakage, which in turn, terminates the particle oscillation known as "Resonant Action". At best, an oxide layer should tell you that there is too much current passing from one plate to the other, where, there should be very little to none at all. This myth was perpetuated after Ravi had made the statement and the rest of the world took it and ran with it.
Good Day!
HairBear,
I'm not disputing that Meyers had no coating on his tubes.
First of all, Ravi got this conditioning idea and process from
me and then
developed his own conditioning regimen. You can ask him youself.
And, it is not a myth, which implies it has been claimed that Meyer's
tubes did have a white powder coating. It must be kept in the proper
context. Myself or Ravi never claimed Meyer had this coating.
I may have speculated on that but have never claimed that
as I have never personally examined Meyer's tubes. But, apparently
both Ravi and I have seen a significant increase in gas production WITH
the coating for less input.
I originally posted this around 5 years ago, this is the 2nd or 3rd time I
posted it after it kept getting deleted:
YouTube - Stan Meyer concentric tube test
Both the below vids are the 2nd or 3rd time I had to post them as well.
YouTube - Water Fuel Cell Conditioning
If I put a choke in series, the of course I can get higher voltaged
and lower current. I have built several variations of the vic for
straight up running the cells to produce gas and not for conditioning,
but haven't really posted anything on that. Anyway, I was the first
to point out the similarity of Meyer's circuits and Bedini's circuits way
back on icubenetwork before it got hacked and shut down.
YouTube - energeticforum's Channel
What I personally observed a long time ago was my inner tubes started
to get a pure white powder coating on them AND as this conditioning
process went on, which is a conditioning process even if
Meyer didn't have that same coating, the gas volume INCREASED consistently
as the white powder coating became more evenly spread across the
entire surface. This idea was based on actual experimental empirical
evidence.
So, it is not a myth that it allows for higher voltage with less current
with the benefit of increased gas production for less energy. It is a fact.
Again, I'm not disputing you about Meyer having no coating.
But if anyone is saying that there is a myth stating Meyer had this
coating...again, it was never claimed and my discovery has been taken
out of context severely.
It is a dielectric coating, restricts current and allows high electrostatic
pressure to be built up - as it does act as a capacitor. If there is no
coating and even if the top ridge of the tubes are bare, the tubes are
basically short circuited. I was able to measure up to
hundreds of volts
in that tube, while most reports I saw were lucky to measure over 2
volts...2 volts because it was short circuited.
This coating I have seen in batteries, and it helps to restrict current while
allowing more voltage potential.
Obviously in the Meyer circuit the primary current restriction should be
the bifilar chokes, which I believe should be wired em coupled and not
in normal series.
It is also
possible that Meyer's tubes have a thin layer of corona dope
or similar to restrict current, while being invisible. If there is no coating,
it is also possible only distilled water was used and no minerals were
available - even though Meyer apparently used both distilled and
tap water.
I have produced gas with distilled water, which indicates electrostatic
separation and not current electrolysis. I didn't use medically grade
triple distilled, just single distilled but there was still no conductivity.
I built the Tay Hee Han cell a while back and I used super corona
dope as the coating on the plates, which with the thickness I used can
hold up to 80,000 volts of electrostatic pressure and that is without
baking the dope, otherwise it would be closer to 100,000 volts.
Did you personally place Meyer's tubes in your hand and examine them
with your own eyes? You said you experimented quite extensively in
this area and found that..implying that you have first hand knowledge
of Meyer's tubes.
The entire Meyer hho world of experimenters should be completely aware
that the dune buggy still exists as well as other hardware. That has been
discussed quite a bit as well. Photos have been produced of the VIC, etc...
and I think some of that is posted in this forum or a couple others.
What is your definition of "particle oscillations"?
This coating in no way inhibits resonance for example in the batteries
that have developed this coating.