Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Aaron

188 posts · 28 threads started · 1,767 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Apr 2007 and Aug 2019

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

electric

For electric, look into the lifepo4 (lithium iron phosphate) batteries. 2-3 times the capacity of a lead acid battery for the same size, rated at WAY MORE cycles, etc... and it is compatible with Bedini's charging technology at Tesla Chargers | World's Most Efficient, Effective & Advanced Battery Chargers - For solar use, I think a few mods are needed in the chargers but the plug in ones can do it off the shelf. I'll have to check.

Bedini's technology is not compatible with lithium ion so lifepo4 is the way to go.
Edward Mitchell disinformation agent

Fel wrote:

I'd like to see what he had to say.
His posts are still on the forum?

Having a different view on something doesn't make him a disinfo agent.
I know they exist but strongly believe Edward Mitchel IS NOT a disinfo agent.
He's just that he has a strong caracter, a big ego, and lots of scientific understanding. Like you Aaron.
He has hundreds of posts here in this forum - you're welcome to look at them and see if your perspective of both of us stays the same.

He IS a disinformation agent, whether he is paid to do that or he is just doing it out of ignorance is another subject.

1. The lies that he and Ray Savant are perpetuating knowingly are his claims that I posted his address online. Fact - I posted a satellite image of what I thought was his work in Texas and I clipped out the coordinates data to maintain his privacy. I did this because he threatened my life and I wanted to let him know I knew who he was. No address was ever posted. Turns out he has always been in Stockton, California.

2. Another lie that Edward Mitchell and Ray Savant are spreading is that Edward Mitchell had to move his family out of fear of their safety because they claimed I posted his address. Fact - See #1 above. They're liars. Edward Mitchell and is wishful thinking that he actually had something of significance makes him lie about these things. He didn't move his family because his address was posted online, because his address was never posted online.

3. Another lie that both Edward Mitchell and Ray Savant are spreading is that I banned Edward Mitchell in order to suppress his information. Fact - he has probably hundreds of posts in this forum that are left intact. Edward Mitchell has nothing of consequence so even if the oil companies wanted to suppress information that threatens them, he has nothing worth suppressing. He was banned here for threatening my life and constantly insulting many of the members who had different opinions of him.

4. He claims Nitrogen is not present in any of Meyer's systems. I've proven indisputably with Meyer's own documents that not only is it present, it is what is responsible for creating a usable fuel that burns like gasoline.

I have all the messages from him claiming his job in the military included protecting the opium fields in Afghanistan or somewhere and he went against these orders and burned the fields down. If that was true, he would be dead right now. He is a pathological liar and I have everything to prove it. This is not slander as I can actually prove that everything I am saying about him is fact documented by his own posts and web archives.

Have you even seen the videos that expose all of Edward Mitchell's lies? It is indisputable that he is a liar and I prove it with facts - not empty claims and rhetoric.

Don't just search his posts on their own, read them in context of the conversations going on with others and you can see what a condescending egomaniac he is. I was very cordial with him and supported his efforts for a long time. But when he started to demean everyone who had a different opinion than him, it was all too obvious what kind of person he was.

If you search around the net, you can see he has been banned from most forums because of his egotism and arrogance that he claims he knows better than anyone else - yet, he has nothing that works other than a wfc with low level gas production.

Edward Mitchell has done everything he could to spread disinformation about what Stan Meyer was doing, period.
Conference networking forum

Here is a private forum for conference attendees that have already paid for their seats: Energy Science Forum

I'll send a password to get in there - please keep it private. The forum will list all members who access it.

This is for early networking so you can get to know some of the other attendees who will be going, business networking, rental car sharing, etc...

This was done at the request of one of the attendees and it's a great idea. I hope that it is helpful.
Dogecoin for the registration fee

Shanjaq wrote:

Will you be accepting Dogecoin for registration?
I'll be accepting most cryptocoins for just a handful of registrations including Dogecoin. If you want to pay with Dogecoin, please PM me with an email and I'll see what I can do.

Thank you.
William Lyne

William Lyne will be speaking at the conference!

It will be a rare opportunity to spend some time with this legend. He is the author of multiple books including Occult Ether Physics and is well known for his work with Atomic Hydrogen Torches.

In several interviews, Eric Dollard has said many of the aetheric concepts that William Lyne shares are valid - much is rooted in the works of JJ Thompson and Tesla. This is a presentation you'll want to see!

You can find his full bio and talk description here: 2014 Energy Science Conference
2 new speakers!

There are a few updates on the conference page and take note that there is a new domain dedicated to the conference: Energy Science Conference - 2014

John Bedini, John Polakowski, Eric Dollard and my own conference presentationdescriptions below our bios have been updated so check them out.

Also, I'm very excited to announce that we have two speakers confirmed that have just cranked the one-of-a-kind status of this conference through the roof! You can see them in the schedule and a preliminary bio and presentation topic. As soon as I have pictures,official bio and presentation topics in hand, I'll announce who they are. You might be able to guess from what I already put in there so it is an understatement to say that this is a conference that you absolutely will want to come to!

Energy Science Conference - 2014

After talking to Eric Dollard today, not only is he excited about his own presentation, he is very excited that these other two speakers will be there! Much of that they do is related to Eric's own work and to have all of these people in one room together may not happen for the rest of your life.

We still have a bit over 4 months to go and there are only 132 seats left! Make sure to register now so you can be a part of the event of a lifetime! Energy Science Conference - 2014

Sincerely,
Aaron - 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference
2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference

Hi Brent,

Peter will be out of town and he has some other projects going on that he has to stay focused on.

Wish he could make it but will still be an awesome conference. There will be a minimum of 3-4 firsts as far as public demos that will be shown that have never been seen before at any conference or public forum.


Registration is now open for the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference.

Conference homepage: Energy Science Forum Technology Conference 2014, formerly known as the Bedini-Lindemann Science & Technology Conference

Where: Hayden, Idaho (next to Spokane, Washington)
When: June 27, 28 & 29, 2014 (Fri, Sat & Sun)

Speakers:

John Bedini
Eric Dollard
Jim Murray
Paul Babcock
John Polakowski
Aaron Murakami
few others being confirmed...

Jeane Manning will moderate a discussion panel.
Edward Mitchell

In a predictable move by H20power (Edward Mitchell) - he sends me this through youtube after I posted the videos debunking him as the real disinformation agent:




Bear no ill will against you anymore Hi Aaron,
With talks to you I have to be ever so careful of what I say as at times you tend to bend things out of context.

In a few weeks or a month I will be showing a working Meyer exciter array as it took me over 16 months to get all the items I needed to make this technology work and now I finally have the last item. Talk about a test in patients as I don't know of many that would sit idle while having to wait for over 16 months to get one item, but wait I did, though at the end I did start to despair a bit.

That person you once knew back then is gone as I have given my life to our Lord and savior Jesus Christ and now walk a different path. Job 38: 22-23 seems to be my calling and I gladly do it for the Lord even if it means my death same as what happened to Meyer. With that being said know that I no longer bear any ill will against you as from the looks of it you have been mislead by people that don't have a good understanding of chemistry nor the periodic table of elements. Don't sweat it as it happens to the best of us.

Now all of my videos are the property of my company and thus any reproduction of my videos in part or in whole without my direct written permission is prohibited by law.

One day you will see that I was correct about what I have been telling people as I was doing things the old fashion way making use of the ever so time consuming scientific method and asking God for help with understanding it all and let me tell you God does in fact answer prayer. I hope this lays to rest any ill will you may think I have for you and that you do notice that I have been giving you a warning of things to come once this technology is brought to light in the hopes that you would see just what I was doing and fix the problem before it becomes a very big one for you.

Well, God Bless,
h2opower

Sent to: Aaron Murakami


07/24/13

--------------

He STILL claims he was correct in what he was saying about Meyer having nothing to do with nitrogen - after already proving indisputably that Edward Mitchell not only lied about this, he claims he already had figured out the whole patent! There are no limits to how low he will go.

It is obvious how deep the delusions and denials go with Edward Mitchell.
same ips

yaro1776 wrote:

Sheesh! I was really starting to enjoy the affected down home style of poseur Big Lew. This site certainly attracts its share of the negative element whose sole mission is to deflect attention from the topic at hand.

RIP Big Lew...
Yeah, same IP address as "DanielPoet" - I should have known.
@Biglew

BigLew wrote:

Yessir I have. Been watchin' the comments too. You keep erasing anything someone says against you. At youtube just like you do here. I think that's dead-wrong. I watched all the videos there. Seems most people think you're wrong and now you're erasing their opinions. That's more like a communist country than America. Shame on you, boy. Hope you never know what it's like to have to fight for your country. You might respect people better then.
Why don't you WAKE UP.

Uploader Comments (TecZ ombie)
Ray Savant has Edward Mitchel's statement against me claiming I'm suppressing his work in his video claiming that I'm manipulating Eric with Meth.

Edward Mitchel is h20power or h2opower and is self-proclaimed Stan Meyer master who replicated his work. If any of you remember a few years back during a lot of talks in the ionization thread, it was Edward Mitchel that denounced that Meyer ever had anything to do with nitrogen. He continued to attack myself, MJN, Tutanka, etc... as being idiots because we did not agree with him and it got nasty.

Edward Mitchel wound up threatening my life so I posted a satellite image of his work to show where he lived and was about to contact the FBI in Arlington, Texas because of this. That is why he was banned in the end.

He is a disinformation agent and is making lies that I banned him to suppress his work. He was living in a fantasy world and we heard right here in the forum that he is arrogant, won't listen to anyone and thinks he knows everything about Meyer.

Since he wants to bear false witness against me, and like a fool, he does so publicly via Ray Savant's video, I posted this to expose him, his false claims about Meyer, etc... to show he has no credibility in anything he says and there are many witnesses here that remember this issue with him before he was banned.

You will actually learn Meyer's secret in this video - in Meyer's own words.

Edward Mitchel - Disinformation Agent Exposed - H20power H2opower - YouTube

It is boring in the technical details, but I'm establishing the facts that show that this "Meyer Expert" actually never read any of the Meyer documents that I review.

Jerry Vollard, you're next.

sodium silicide

#4 ·

sodium silicide

Out of all the reference, it looks like SIGNA is the only one making it - possibly.

Here's the MSDS: http://signachem.com/wp-content/them...GNa%20NaSi.pdf

First product that used it: PowerTrekk: Mobile phone charger that runs on water | Mail Online

On board hydrogen generation: Green Car Congress: Hydrogen Production from Sodium Silicide Powder; Prospects for On-Board Generation

More info about silicides: Silicide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Signa's page:

Water Fuel Secrets

#15 ·

transmutation

cplouffe wrote:

I would think the ambient air / especially nitrogen is important because you are working with transmutation IMO. Moving nitrogen to hydrogen or lower octave more combustible gases using electricity and pressure changes. See Walter Russell.


Also Tesla claimed to ignite nitrogen with HV which was done by manipulating the "nucleus" of the atom using fields. Ala Russell. Russell used conical coils to either oblate or prolate the atom moving it from one element to the other. Just change the current and angles.
It's related but is another concept than what Meyer did in my opinion.

You can search Andreyev and AUTOTHERMIA. Turning air into fuel. Tutanka makes reference to someone else with similar theories.

Can oxygen be split into an atom of nitrogen and hydrogen?

I think Lyne's Free Energy Surprise discusses the HV and nitrogen. I don't know anyone that has replicated it through.

Water Fuel Secrets

#13 ·

hho "catalyst"

Kokomoj0 wrote:

I came to the same conclusion
I think George Wiseman may have to - I recall him saying something like the hho as a supplement just acts as a catalyst. But don't quote me on that.

Water Fuel Secrets

#11 ·

Brown's gas

Somebody (a good friend of mine) skyped me claiming Brown's Gas is a controlled burn. That is not a slow burning fuel at all and is NOTHING like what Meyer was running his car on. Brown's Gas unmodified with nitrogen dilution/ionization is a TORCH when you have enough production of it and it is under some pressure.

The water fuel without being modified is absolutely incredible as a welding flame for some very interesting applications. I've been a fan of it ever since I found out about it and have bought several of books on it from George Wiseman because I think he has the best info. If you are interested in that kind of application, visit: DIY energy saving methods and devices but please don't confuse that with getting the thermal energy out of the water fuel like what Stan Meyer is talking about. Completely different.

It is fine as a fuel supplement to mix with gas/air in an engine because the reactive oxygen molecules will break the hydrocarbons into smaller molecules increasing the BTU you get from the same amount of fuel. That is where the increase comes from, not from the hydrogen in the "hho".

As a SOLE fuel for an engine, you CAN run an engine on it but you are at a serious net loss because you lose the ability for it to truly combust while it is volatile and only detonates. Tero and others showed this. Filled up a balloon ahead of time and ran an engine until the fuel ran out. You will never use the plain hho like that and expect a gain in energy.

Water Fuel Secrets

#10 ·

evidence of severe psychosis / split personality disorder?

jonabel1971 wrote:

That's funny, we've never denied anything. Slowing hydrogen's burn can be done with water vapor, or non-conbustible gases, or both.

Plus, you are trying to hide the fact that you don't have a scientific background, by erasing all my threads about your fraudulent education.
Here are your denials:

Jon Abel claims...

"Discussioners" are wondering why your members have such poor replication success rates. It's because the last two replications were killed by talks of Nitrogen technology that doesn't exist. "

"As for Aaron's advice, you will not find any "Nitrogen technology" by Stan Meyer online."

It looks like twice he had tried to kill discussion of Meyer's Hydrogen technology - by deflecting attention to Nitrogen gas - and then not elaborating on the technology. Aaron is full of crap - he is paid for the lies and abuse he spews. Argon gas was one of the non-combustible gases that Stan spoke of"

When Aaron offers suspect information about Nitrogen, ask him if he is willing to show the proof. If "No.", then that's lying. As far as I am concerned, Aaron has not read a sentence of Stan Meyer literature."

Why should I respect the things you have to say about an alleged Stan Meyer Nitrogen Machine? Nobody else can verify your claim, either."

It's funny how you guys make a big deal about adding ambient air."

"Besides nitrogen-oxides, I have not seen Nitrogen mention in Stan Meyer's documentation."



You win the fruitcake award - you denied over and over that non-combustible gases is nitrogen and that Meyer never talked about Nitrogen and now you act like you knew all along how to slow the burn of fuel by mixing it with non-combustible gases, which Meyer says is Nitrogen. The only thing slowing the burn of all of this is NITROGEN.

I hope I'm not the only one who can see the games you are playing.

I posted your DENIALS several times. It is not debatable. You denied this many times and now you're acting like you knew it all along!

And about my education? I deleted it in other threads because you're wasting space. I LEFT YOUR POST about that in this thread and responded about my education.

Water Fuel Secrets

#9 ·

Stan Meyer & Nitrogen

jonabel1971 wrote:

You are putting the cart before the horse for most (if not all) of your followers - again. I reason I asked, was because I just wanted to see if you would actually say the word hydrogen. You are so against understanding that you need to produce hydrogen 1st - before you slow its burn - that you refuse to see or believe that most of the people on your forum haven't done ANY of it, yet.
That's fine. No more benefit of the doubt. You absolutely are dedicated to lying to people.

First of all, everything I have shown here about Meyer IS producing hydrogen and to insinuate anything different only reveals your inauthentic intentions. This FACT is spelled out throughout this entire thread.

And THEN, that hydrogen and oxygen mixture from the water gas is modified by the nitrogen process.

WAY LATER - came the tubes and resonant circuits. The tube electrodes and resonant circuits are 100% IRRELEVANT to Meyer's discovery or rediscovery of how to make water fuel with a slow burning rate.

You have misled a lot of people into believing the WFC and resonant circuits are the initial step when people can actually get the results without ever knowing what a resonant circuit is.

And, you have denied over and over and over that Meyer never talked about Nitrogen - let's not forget that!

And let's also not forget how you continue to ask, " Slow the burn of what, Aaron? Slow the burn of what gases?" Anyone should be able to see by this kind of comment of yours that you actually have never studied very much of Stan Meyer's work at all since you have denied repeatedly the existence of Meyer's explanations of the role of NITROGEN in this process.

Most manipulators are a bit more slick than you. You are overtly clumsy about your methods and ways and have left a long trail of evidence reveling your ignorance in all of this.

Jon Abel claims...

"Discussioners" are wondering why your members have such poor replication success rates. It's because the last two replications were killed by talks of Nitrogen technology that doesn't exist.

"As for Aaron's advice, you will not find any "Nitrogen technology" by Stan Meyer online."

It looks like twice he had tried to kill discussion of Meyer's Hydrogen technology - by deflecting attention to Nitrogen gas - and then not elaborating on the technology. Aaron is full of crap - he is paid for the lies and abuse he spews. Argon gas was one of the non-combustible gases that Stan spoke of"

When Aaron offers suspect information about Nitrogen, ask him if he is willing to show the proof. If "No.", then that's lying. As far as I am concerned, Aaron has not read a sentence of Stan Meyer literature."

Why should I respect the things you have to say about an alleged Stan Meyer Nitrogen Machine? Nobody else can verify your claim, either."

It's funny how you guys make a big deal about adding ambient air."

"Besides nitrogen-oxides, I have not seen Nitrogen mention in Stan Meyer's documentation."


you will know that resonance is an initial step towards getting a Stan Meyer device to work"

--------------

No, resonance is NOT the initial step towards getting a Stan Meyer device to work. Very simple NON resonant pulsed DC to flat plates produces exactly what Meyer did INITIALLY and he modified it with NITROGEN to make it slow burning. Any debate from you about this is nothing but manipulation of the facts. You're not proving what you know - you're proving exactly what you don't - that is unconscious incompetence.