Steve

Lets run on ammonia.

Steve

Steve,
     I had read somewhere that to run an engine on HHO alone requires 1 LPM of HHO for every Litre of engine size. There is also a curve to do what I want, just supplement the petrol/gasoline engine with an EFIE and HHO, where at one point the efficiency drops off because there is too much HHO for the supplement process.I have moved my timing 5 deg. closer to TDC to get rid of the acceleration and uphill travel valve rattle. I still need to add a non-foul adapter to withdraw the 02 sensor from the exhaust stream some. I guess that I would want to start at 1 LPM and go to no more than 2 LPM of gas production without using acid for an electrolyte. Water with a PWM seems the best way to go. I would also need a PWM Schematic to do this. Be reminded please, this is for my use only not a way to make money from someone elses ideas or research.    Akin

Hi Akin,

My suggestion would be to go to this website: http://www.waterfuelforall.com/
The owner , Wouter, is selling good working boosters.
They do around 1 till 2 litres a minute and are around 95% efficient and thats really good.

The other option is to go and build a serie drycell, like the EBN cell. (google)

Steve

Steve and group,
     
    What would be the best/simplest cell to use on my 1988 dodge d100 pickup with a 3.9L/239 cu. in. engine with Throttle body injection. I am looking to replace the 4 jar system I currently have. Fuel is petrol/gasoline, and mpg went from 8 to 12 city--12 to 16 highway with the additional resource use of a poor mans EFIE.
     Any help/suggestions will be considered and appreciated greatly. If there would be any other information I have omitted, please ask. Also I have not built a PWM yet, I would like to get away from electrolyte and do plan to use Plasma  spark ignition in the spring as well as HHO.
                                                                                                   Akin

Hi Akin,

How much litre HHO per minute do you need?

regards
Steve

You know what, I was wrong!

Stan does pulse the rotor of the alternator, at least as shown in this patent: 4798661 -Gas Generator Voltage Control Circuit

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v81/bigbuba/Picture14-3.png)

Yep.

Thats the Kevin West methode. Just pulsing the rotor.
I think to remember that Warp found some effects when aletrnator rpm's and rotorpulses matched.

Donald, as soon as you start pulsing a wfc, you see voltage taking over 
Sadly enough it doesnt produce more gas, so far.

Steve

Whoever was pushing for me to pass that test, preying or whatever,,, THANK YOU.

I Passed...

Special Thanks Goes to whoever you are.

Congratulations!

We have results from the first tests. Water stays charged positive with a 2D setup from the cosmic engine. About 10 seconds with a water glass on top of the 2D model is enough to charge up the water. Though the 2D model is a bit unbalanced since one centripetal force line lacks this is very, very good news. Next test will be with a 3D model.

Amazing stuff!

Steve

Hi everyone, now I have a model of the cosmic(planet, body) engine. If you look at it you see why Pantone had sucess with counter spinning vortices and why the water engine is an ion engine and why steam+HHO is necesssary. The neutral center is the heart of the engine(Keely) and chinese medicine is right, 12 internal force lines and 8 external lines(bows).

Have a look and if you have crystals at hand try to place them in the geometric pattern.

Interesting stuff, Gauss   

Steve

If you have a look at the gas processor of Stan Meyer,
 you will see that there will be some vacuum, because of the tubes who makes a smaller part, which will act as venturi.

Ionization aka taking electrons away fr atoms, is much easier in a vacuum.
See the old vacuum radio tubes.

Steve

No. Its a normal diode.
The name crowbar is because of the place of it.

The diagram is as follows: + diode coil tubeset coil Fet ground.
The crowbar diode is placed like this:  a diode placed from the end of the second coil towards the input of the first coil.
Now tune in....

Steve

I dont think that anyone here is having experience with nickel plates.
I tried to get some prices for 2 plates, so i can do some tests.
Man, that nickel is very expensive...'

PWM is always a good option to control current, if you have a good current controlling pm, of course.

Steve

Hello group,
    I'm new here and stumbled upon the SMACKS site while surfing. Elektro is recalling his boosters, with a rebate, to upgrade them to the Nickle plates.
                                                                                                       Akin

Thats nice from Smack, i ll gues...

I have seen the effect with the Bob boyce toroid that when you have spike over a spike, the voltage will rise....

Can you extract energy from an oscillating magnetic field? ... The earth has an oscillating magnetic field...


Sounds possible to me, but I haven't done it...

That was what i meant...
Still it should be a nice experiment..

It you want to look at What tesla was doing, I think he was trying to pull energy out of the earth, and not so much the aether, (maybe he was in other systems, but the wardencliff system was about the earth, I think) The earth's magnetic and electric fields oscillate naturally at 7.83 Hz, By building tuned coils to resonant with the earths natural frequency then you can use the energy in the earths magnetic and electric fields just like any other magnetic or electric field in any other conventional circuit....

You mean that if we build a resonance parallel or serial circuit of 1 coil and capacitor that resonanates on the 7.8hz we could extract power from the environment?
 
 
Steve

Galvanic corrosion is the corrosion that results when two dissimilar metals with different potentials are placed in electrical contact in an electrolyte.

A difference in electrical potential exists between the different metals and serves as the driving force for electrical current flow through the corrodant or electrolyte. This current results in corrosion of one of the metals. The larger the potential difference, the greater the probability of galvanic corrosion.

Galvanic corrosion only causes deterioration of one of the metals. The less resistant, active metal becomes the anodic corrosion site. The stronger, more noble metal is cathodic and protected.

Galvanic corrosion potential is a measure of how dissimilar metals will corrode when placed against each other in an assembly. Metals close to one another on the chart generally do not have a strong effect on one another, but the farther apart any two metals are separated, the stronger the corroding effect on the one higher in the table.

This table lists the potential differences for various metals in water. The order of the series can change for different electrolytes (for example, different pH, ions in solution).

The difference is like a 0.1v per tube. Thats a gain, but not very much.
For a tubecell it does matter.
Not sure how to use this in drycells....

2011 = selfrunner??!!!!
Sure we can 

Dear members and guests,

I want to thank you all for another exciting year.
It was the 4th year for me researching the water as fuel challange.
New things where found and hopefully next year we can make even more progress.

Thank you all.

Steve
Administrator Ionizationx

Well done!
Cannot wait to hear more on this.
 
Steve

Hi Fabio,

I understand what you try to do and what you are saying. I do appriciate this out of the box thinking of you.
Dynodon is right in his advise to try to keep it simple.
However, all simple things are tried and tested.
Don, what is your latest test? Would you like to share that?


My 2 cents on this:
I know of charging watercells. I know people done it. Even when the powersupply was off, the charge was there.
Or the tubes where charged or the water. Not sure on that detail.

I also know that  Stan has a third wire on the tubecell sign in some drawings. Some suggested that was going into the waterbath.

If you charge water, then its not electrons that are passsing thru the charge, but ions, like Bubz stated.
Electrons could be set free in that water when the watermolecule is separated.
However, electrons are NEVER consumed. The can travel, but cannot be consumed. Please keep that in mind.

Stan also said that his proces is the opposite of the electrolysis proces.
In my opinion that means pulling charge out of the water, instead of adding charges.
Or in other words. moving electrons out of the waterbath...
Like you use a voltagefield, like a magnet does, on one electrode and one on the other electrode.
Pulling....

Well, there stops my theory, because i do not know how to make the water instable in a way that the bonds are broken and electrons are free moving towards the electrodes.
Possible because 1 coil and 1 electrode can have a voltage potential and the other electrode with coil as well?
It might be not needed to have a voltage potential across the electrodes?
Just 2 voltage fields outside the tubes and not crossover it? Like magnets?

Feel free to drill down my 2 cents here.....