They modified ChatGPT to be "faster" (really they made it dumber, and increased "hallucinations")...I wonder why?? 🤔 At any rate, a nice conversation about mixed solid and liquid dielectric coaxial capacitors. Confirmed some ideas I have about insulating the negative.... Then a comforting discussion on my idea to directly control my dual CD4047BE resonant frequency/gating circuit with a digital resistor and an arduino to track and maintain drifting resonance ("highly accurate, and a very flexible/cost-effective solution")....had to correct datasheet info several times, but finally got there lol. It's gonna work like a charm, and it even gave me some C++ code to use just the arduino ADC input and all software to get it done with a pick-up loop on/near the transformer. To think, most people are making drawings or writing stories/click-bait....
I got some large chunks of Delrin, and plenty of PETG filament...gonna draft/print some parts out of PETG to test and finalize parts to be machined out of Delrin later. PETG is a good insulator, and chemically resistant too, they may be good enough to hold up to ionized hydrogen, we'll see.
Took me longer than expected, tooling stainless is a pain in the butt....several heat cycles have gotten the micro-welded outter tube as paramagnetic as I can get it...barely holds a neo-magnet now, the weld (seen in the top of the attached pic) is still a little more ferromagnetic, that's why I lined the optical port with the weld (to remove the strongest ferromagnetic portion). I really need to get a mini-kiln to hold the temp at 1100deg for an extended period to get it fully paramagnetic. The inner seamless tube won't even hold a neo-magnet.
I've been busy with the family lately (catching up on yard work, installing a pool, and quality time)..., but I've gotten a pair of ignition coils, 40khz piezo transducers, an ozone generator with water bubbler, 6lbs of citric acid, and a 405nm laser delivered. Waiting on 40 3w 410nm LEDs to be delivered (highest energy absorbtion spectrum of hydrogen(Stan's red LEDs were the lowest energy absorbtion spectrum). But in the meantime I've started developing a compliment-gated CD4047b frequency generator and I'm fabricating a 19-tubeset Cell, along with a few test cells with a tighter .91mm gap (gap distance for the acoustic 4th harmonic of 10khz (40khz)). I've also had some more productive talks with ChatGPT about a hypothetical "water capacitor", effect of insulating the postive, how water would still be part of the dielectric, polarization, photoelectric effect, momentary ionization, temporary solvated electrons, orthagonal magnetic field effect on ions and moving electrons, the inverse of classic electrolysis, behavior of sound and voltage wave propagation in concentric tubes, resonant pulsed DC charging circuits, charging chokes, and even a lil argument about String theory being essentially rebranded Aether theory...lol ChatGPT is becoming quite the valuable tool. It helped me calculate the .91mm annular gap being a 4th harmonic of 10khz waveguide for 40khz ultrasound through 20c water, and how to tune resistance and inductance experimentally to make the RLC circuit also resonate electrically at 40khz.
I've also been reading alot of recent research papers on the current state of "the art", specifically ultrasonic electrolysis, chromium and nickel catalysts, plasma electrolysis, electron and proton tunneling, and something that really clicked with photoelectric effect, and subsequent "soft x-ray" emmision... Looking at you Herman P. Anderson (RIP), and your Hydrogen isotope "radiolysis" water plugs...oh and ozone absorbtion in water, and NO3 scavenging of solvated electrons from Water, wondering why it's always NO3, and not O3...think it's probably because O3 decomposes to NO2 and NO3, and hydroxyl radicals relative quickly (1hr at most on cold water)
I'm also finishing up a scratch built 3d printer on linear rails, it has dual steppers on every axis to create torque for the heavy y-axis 5/16" forged aluminum bed, and high-speed/balance and precision for the x-axis...the z-axis has really nice anti-backlash nuts, should be really nice to help rapid prototyping. Just have to trim the bed a little, cut /drill the steel flatstock to mount the bed to the bearing blocks, and mount the solid state relay to drive the bed from mains 120vac. My old modified robo3D R1+ is getting tired, and I'm tired of the z-artifacts from the cheap "floating" gantry....So, I'm quite busy lately, but I'm chugging along..."I'll be back" 😅🫡
Expanding on the importance of self/mutual inductance and how to manipulate it.
Making self/mutual-inductance work in phase with applied primary current, accelerating the change in work, and compressing the time scale, amplifying total power delivered (step-up transformer)
Take for instance again the attached simple circuit. I have no video at the moment, but, if you build it, you will see. Without the diode from the LV+ to HV lead, you will see both electrodes light up, with the bottom neon electrode being brighter. If you add the diode string, you will see only the bottom electrode light up MUCH brighter.
Without the diodes, the forward current of the primary, through mutual-induction creates a reversed flow in the secondary, and the the HV lead is HV- on forward induction and the top neon terminal lights up (current flows from + towards -, the HV- lights up because Voltage flows - towards + ), then the current stops flowing, and the magnetic field collapses much faster than the forward field grew, ("flyback always collapses faster), this collapse reverses the voltages, and the change in work happening over a shorter time increases voltage (Delta Work/Delta Time) making the bottom neon electrode glow brighter.
Now adding the diode... Normally, as the primary current flows, the mutual-induced current in the secondary opposes the current flow in the primary and creates an opposing reversed magnetic field that fights the magnetic field being created in the primary, by adding the diode string with negative polarity facing the HV lead....this reversed mutual-induced HV- current shorts out through the diodes, as such the opposing induced current in the secondary is allowed to flow out of the secondary, this also removes the opposing induced magnetic field in the Flux core. So this first step, neutralizes the opposition of mutual-inductance. At the exact same time, the rerouting of this current out of the inductor of the secondary, creates its own reversed self/mutual inductance in opposition to itself, into the secondary, along with a magnetic field also opposed to itself, this self/mutual inductance of a self/mutual induced current is now IN PHASE WITH the primary current/magnetic field (opposite of an opposition), and pulls the primary magnetic field into the core faster, and in turn, pulls the current in faster, which in turns increases the induced current/field speed, etc, etc....in essence, it creates a positve feedback loop, exponentially accelerating the speed which current/voltage is distrubuted across both primary and secondary coils (both coils are energized). Once the capacitor/pulse is empty/off, the voltage across the primary reverses (see RLC circuits) matching secondary polarity (there is also a possibility the primary current(s) are pulled into the feedback loop as the HV- potential rises, as they would be HV+ biased regardless of their LV bias). The diode shuts off, and the magnetic field starts to collapse, being as there is no opposed current/field in the coils, or in the iron core, the "Flyback" occurs faster than normal, and the voltage flips and increases many factors higher, and all power is sent forward across neon/gap. None of the power was lost (besides losses due to resitance), and it was in fact, amplified beyond initial input. Aetheric inpouring was allowed to occur by destabilizing/reorienting self/mutual-inductions that would normally balance/oppose forward applied current and magnetic field propagation/collapse. (I suspect self/mutual-induced counter currents/EM fields arise from aetheric polarization)
Very interesting, such a thing may very well be possible. If you kinetically resonate it with enough amplitude, the molecule would shake apart, I will take some time to look into it more. Stan's WFC with the electron extraction circuit (the demo model did not have an EEC), moved electrons out of water without pushing others in, so that along with H2 and O2 dissociation gave the cooling effect. If your AI assisted method works, it would be interesting to see if the resonance imparts heat via collision.
Yes, I was pulsing a low power neon sign transformer that is rated 5kv when driven at 120VAC....I was driving it at 12VDC. So the power spikes were much lower...but definitely HV...at least around 300-500V impulses. (Too hard to tell on my scope...off the charts) So, yes a random xformer, a random choke, and a random capacitor. What you have to realize is there was NO AMPLIFIER STAGE in those videos....I was pulsing it straight from the 555 (sharpest signal u can get really, adding amplifier stages degrades the square wave)....So, the power is EXTREMELY LOW!!! Max output from a 555 before it blows up is around 12v @ 190ma....that's around 2 watts...mine were running cool at around 80ma or about 1watt....but, it's a square wave (on half the time)...so the out put is divided by two, so it's really less then 1/2 a watt.
As you can see in this video, the voltage is very high indeed. It is high enough voltage to travel over my dry skin (which is a very large resistance)...this phenomena is very interesting!
You have to understand...ANY setup will have a natural resonance. As long as it include SOME R=resistance L=inductance C=capacitance. So, you could make a random WFC, a random choke coil...and a random transformer. No matter what the values are...that system will resonate at some frequency. You can sweep through the frequencies with a probe on the WFC and see resonance when the voltage spikes up.
P.S. If anyone has a copy of a video I made a while back where I pulsed an ignition coil with a 555 and captured charge on one wire and discharged a xenon bulb....I have lost it and would like it again. It is another example of resonance....and in fact i made a companion video showing the standing wave all my house and in my oscope w/o a connection made!!
@Outlawstc "it is resonance not of electric but of waters natural ability to take on the charge"
This may be true...but, water's relaxation time is rather slow. Being so slow, it holds a charge rather well when done right. For instance study Lord Kelvin's Water Drop Generator. The water is charged as it leaves the water container.
"Even though water has no overall electric charge, it is full of movable electric charges (called ions). Half of the water's charges are positive and half are negative. It is not hard to separate these charges; simply hold an electrified object near the water. The electrified object will attract the "unlike" charges to the water's surface. It will also repel the "alike" charges away deeper into the water.
In the above diagram, the positive object attracts the water's negative ions and repels the positive ions. This draws an excess of negative ions into the tip of the water dripper, while repelling an equal amount of positive ions off to the other end of the dripper. When the water drop detaches from the tip of the dripper, an overall negative electric charge is still trapped in the droplet. The falling water droplet carries away negative charge, leaving the dripper slightly positive. If we catch the falling droplets in a container, the container will become negatively charged. "
So my point is...I TRULY believe it is super simple. I think resonance is for the gains in voltage potential only, but, I could be wrong
Take this as evidence of my stance.... "Microwave heating is sometimes explained as a resonance of water molecules, but this is incorrect: such resonance only occurs in water vapor at much higher frequencies, at about 20 GHz." I cannot get that high of a frequency....can you?
@All The connection is of little importance...no matter what, you wind it the same way. Two wires at the same time...just have it terminate at some posts (like the VIC pic)...after that, you can test which way we want to go in (either opposite sides...or same side) simple testing will show u. So calm down!
That is the resultant flow of the wires in "series"...it's only 2D...In real life it looks like a double sided vortex.
You tried to coat the electrodes with silicon sand, right? What were your findings?
@Alan Yes I did, it was about the same as the carbon. It made a distinct layering that gave me the ability to hold more charge. Also, the layers acted like diodes....it would carry tiny current one direction. Reverse it and it would carry a bunch....but, it would also remove your layer.
@All The connection is of little importance...no matter what, you wind it the same way. Two wires at the same time...just have it terminate at some posts (like the VIC pic)...after that, you can test which way we want to go in (either opposite sides...or same side) simple testing will show u. So calm down!
But if most of you blind believers did some real testing you would know this by now.
I'm not even gonna school you dude...keep on thinking you know what you're doin I will say however, that comment is some ignorant shit! It amazes me how people think their "replication" failure is somehow everyone's failure...too funny
No offense Steve...but, I read nothing of any resonance, you said you needed a bigger tube because your circuit couldn't reach 300Khz. I see no successful replication at all. Maybe you have talked to others that have...but, I would like to see proof. Here's the difference Steve, I try and decipher a rather mysterious patent...I use my reading comprehension coupled with my knowledge of physics and electrical effects to hypothesize how it's operating. We know voltage potential is suppose to do work...we know that there is suppose to be IONIZED GAS....we know that AMPS ARE INHIBITED...I know how electricity REALLY works...and the "Poynting Flow" or voltage phenomena is the driving force, and that it's energy manipulates electrons and anti-electrons (Or whatever the counter flow is)....so I put the equation together and see it working in my mind....I offer MY OPINION!
You on the other hand are trying to tell us all "As a matter of fact" that it's a myth and that Naudin failed and it was just amps leaking...you say
Quote
Of course we seen hv and capacitance and resonance
, yet when you show your replication you have no such thing. So, I ask you...why do you speak from authority, saying "it's a myth...it's amp leakage making bubbles"?...when clearly you are skipping the whole basis of my interpretation!
If you make a perfect capacitor (even a good yet slightly leaky one)...just charging it will only create minimal gas...once charged YOU MUST RE-ROUTE THE CHARGE...disconnected from load so you don't create an energy sink that would draw more amps on the primary wire (this is the gating time of Meyer's system)...the charge is on the plates...AND ACROSS THE WATER/DIELECTRIC...you should read up on HOW to make ionized gas if you think my mode of operation is a "The Myth of Meyer"
I had email contact with Naudin at the time that he published that wfc test. He was convinced that he was right and that he wanted to go for a fully insulated tube. As you can see at his video and drawing, he used tape to cover his tube. I tried that too and it became clear to me that there where amps leaking. That would also be the reason why he didnt publishe his promised new setup. He should have found out what happend. His theory is nice, btw. It would be great if someone was able to prove its working.
Steve
Well, Steve..... Have you noticed he has published NOTHING NEW!!!....Not one thing since that WFC test!!!!!! You honestly think that's because he was wrong?? I rest my case
P.S. I belonged to a skype water fuel chat group...and, I purposed the insulated electrode WAY before Naudin ever did it. I had VERY heated discussions with the head of Energeticforum (before there was an energeticforum) over this exact issue....it ended with him saying "I said this to begin with" Then a couple months later Naudin tried it out...it is by no way HIS theory...neither is it MINE...it was my interpretation of various things Stan said + my own understanding of how you get voltage to do work w/o amp leakage. As for your replication of Naudin and "knowing" it was leaking amps....your setup was NOT Naudins...and, he definitely showed an increase in capacitor action...if it leaked, that's fine....it still shows step charging and increase of overall charge. However, even Naudin's replication is not perfect...he only reached 1Kv...Stan notes around 16-20Kv!!
@Waytogo Yes...electrolysis is "HOT" because electrons are being crammed into the water creating friction...which creates heat. Meyer's process doesn't allow electrons in....instead he "POTENTIALIZES" the water's electrons and then provides an energy "sink" for them. So it's cool because electrons are leaving!!!
There are no "piezo bolts" threaded into the slots on top of the Meyer tubes! Those slots are for acoustically tuning the outer pipes to match the inner pipe...look at an organ pipe...realize the Longitudinal Voltage waves propagate the same way as sound. This piezo bolt nonsense is a serious leap...and a HUGE waste of resources, both time and money!!!!!!!!!
Meyer used quartz in his hydrogenlaser, but not sure why, guess as a non-conducting separation material for the electrodes.
He used a quartz tube to make the body of his hydrogen laser because of the intense heat made inside....quartz glass is one of the most heat resistant materials.
Yes I do believe it states in the patent he made a ceramic mixture from the minerals that make piezo's. In a certain combination. You should be able to see that.
Well, sorry, but you believe incorrectly...there is an insulating "vitreous ceramic"...STOVE CLAY...but, NOWHERE does it say piezo....NOWHERE!
This is what it says about it.... "...Said center hollow tubular electrode carries water, and is separated from the outer cylindrical electrode by a porous ceramic vitreous material, and the inner surface of the outer cylindrical electrode exists a space to contain the water electrolysed."
"...The center tubular electrode is coated with a nickel alloy, and surrounded with a porous vitreous ceramic and a glass tube with the exception of the tip that faces the second electrode"
You are making shit up....if you know anything about piezos...they are NOT porous, in fact they are a seamless crystal matrix. I deal in facts...not assumptions...get your facts straight
I have included the Puharich patent so u can see for yourself!
