I aways think about what is the progress and how could it be if those who discover things didn't patented them.
I'm working on old ideas like tay he han and fracture cell and all related again because now i think that i have enough or at least more background to be able to achieve results.
Now i also have a small 3 member team and a lab in the university. Unfortunately we are all very very busy and the project run very slow but keep going.
I'm recently thinking about meyer using the cell like an antena. At frequencies that were not the frequencies that he mentioned.
Way to go, dude! From playing gitar in Italy to a chief master at the uni in brasil
Still on the list is try better with coils. Bigger coils with more joule capacity. High voltage like 600v Amps will run like crazy at such voltage rates... All done in peaks. Who wants to join in? I trully want some company and i want to share all i find out..
Well, i have been playing with mercury electrodes. A person stated that it will produce nascent hydrogen. I tried to mix ambient air in the waterbath.. But no ammonia. Later, i reread some pm,s with Aaron from the other forum and we talked about this some years ago, and he wrote back to try hot air.... I also want to try ionized air....rip of some electrons first....heh Hehe.... Then mix it with virgin hydrogen ions..... ......
The Rai is a big exhibition building in Amsterdam....
Daobra, Some of the old dieselengines had the funny thing that they could run on water, directly.... I heard this from more then 1 person. Myself, i never had the change to test this. Maybe they ran first on diesel and switched later to water. About the cell of Thewaterenergy person, i cannot see anything else then you do. The guy states that it runs in resonance.... He fills an empty waterbottle with steam as a way of measurements...... So, not sure what he is doing....but it looks like some kind of pre-commercial steps....
Looks like to me that you did it all according common knowledge. Dave Lawton stated that the High Voltage spikes are difficult to measure. What he did, was cathing the spikes into a capacitor and lighted a bulb with it...
Sorry i cannot help more in this. Btw. long time ago my buddy had contact with Ravi. Do not expect to much of Ravi's efforts, as well as of the schematic of mr. Crampton. Without any scientific proof, or without any confirmation by an independent observer, we must stay realistic and assume that no extra ordinary results were achieved. Extra ordinary means from my point of view any results higher then 150% efficiency accordingly to Faradays laws of electrolysis.
Can you draw how you hooked up yr coil? If its bifilar, you must do it the right way. Other question is with which device you try to measure the HV peaks?
the future in pinned on electric cars . points ign and carburetters are history , everything analog is gone , its all heading to drive by wire
1980s and 90s car companies made H2 prototypes but now the only R&D is in H2 fuel cell electric cars
where does that leave H2 gas vehicles
Dear Massive,
Try to research a bit deaper. If you have for example, 10 litres of Hydrogen. What would you do with it? Put it in an combustion engine with an efficiency of 35%, or would you use it in a fuel cell with electromotor output who can be up towards 90% efficiency?
The thing Mr. Ed is forgetting - and will continue to ignore (unscientifically) - is that there is no such thing as 'negative potential'. All potential is positive. Negative values are based on the convenience of assigning the earth's surface potential as 'zero'. With positive hv potential on one electrode, and much less positive potential on the other, the strongest potential field will still be at the surface of the stronger electrode.
If he's talking about charge, in the sense that presence of electrons makes a negative charge while absence of electrons makes a positive charge, then his 'dual charged mini capacitor' theory violates Stan Meyer's stipulation of minimal current. Without current, one side of a capacitor can't develop a negative electron charge.
Yup. I agree here with yr explanation. Its called a potential difference, is it. One pole with more or less electrons then the other.
I have been pretty much interested in the concept of using air/nitrogen being sucked into a waterfuelcell by engine vacuum. Virgin hydrogen bonds with the nitrogen, as the nitrogen is also exposed to voltage, even high voltage spikes in some possible setups....... Creating Nh3...
I got banned from this site for wanting to talk about ionization
You didn't get "banned", only suspended for a month - you're still here. And it was for posting about religion, not ionization.
Quote
and even you wanted me banned for consistently saying this technology is about ionization.
You are fabricating, pure and simple. END OF DISCUSSION.
Steve do you care to enlighten this guy? as after all it was you who banned me back in 2008 for wanting to talk about the Gas Processor or was it something else?
P.S. I was already banned when I designed and had these Gas Processors made.
Please dont toy with my intelligence here... Its an attemp to proces gas. I havent seen any evidence that yr setup is doing what you claim. For sure it looks like what Meyer made.
My short 2 cents for you on this topic based on my years of research... 1. the type of gas generated with this urea/pee in combi with with the nickel electrodes is a BETTER gas then the normal HHO that comes with electrolysis of water. Better in the sense of running a generator or car. The burn rate of the N and H is slower and fits because of that better for engines. 2. The lower voltage needed for the electrolysis proces makes this urea solution more efficient in terms of used power consumption then the use of plain water....... Hope this answers your question