Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Steve

1,613 posts · 384 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Dec 2007 and Dec 2025

An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Precursor Engineering

#8 · date not recorded

Well, dankie....
Did ever cross yr mind that stan patents everything he knew? He said him self. Nobody can pass his patents if you wanna run an engine.
But are all components needed?
I say NO, because my big engine is running now on hydrogen/oxygen mix.

if you look at the electrolysis proces, then the old methode of chemicals is also taking the watermols apart. Stan and me both dont use chemicals, but we use voltage and the natural contamination of water as medium. Its the reall kiss methode.

vic and injectors is explanable.
Hv and a tubecell isnt.

br
steve























Hmmmm,

Maybe i have to correct the powerfactor on my variac.....
Then i will be sure come closer to having a closed selfsustaining generator on HHO.
I have been wondering about that my self, and planing to test it out.

here is my plan:

use my existing PF meter and check the power factor of an inductive load like a motor.

then turn off the power for the entire house. and power the motor only.

use a stop watch and check how long it takes for the electric meter to complete one turn.

then correct the power factor and check the electric meter again.

from what I read about PF, it can only be adjusted on inductive loads.

Same here.
Just run some tests on it.
If my meter is slowing down when i corrected the powerfactor, then we have a point, is it.

Steve





Hi,

Here the start of a off topic subject.
However, we all might save us lots of money, which we then can use for our waterfuel projects... ;D



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89oHs2nHb78&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CwsogS0xIc&feature=fvw


In this video you hear the man talking about not being able to save money, but is he correct?
His amps drop. his volts drop, so in my opinion, his powermeter should drop as well.....

What are your thought on this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_factor
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_11/3.html

Steve


greetings from the surface

#2 · date not recorded

ive been looking at this forum occasionally probably for a few years. im not sure if i understand the purpose or goal of hosting these discusions. obviously it has something to do with running dc throuh water or electrolysis or other processes which are related or completely unrelated to electrolysis with the purpose of converting water into gases but is it to share and inspire to create for strangers? can we share simple to create electrolysis designs?
 i have a similar interest to the last. i havent found much useful i formation that i can use on this forum. is there a reason for that? it feels like people are trying to teach.  my question is what are the effects of decresing the atmzospheric pressure on working electrolysis cells. i seen demonstration that water boils at lower temperature under lower atmospheric pressure unless ive made a mistake and does standard electrolysis function relate to water pressure?

Hi there.

There is clearly a difference in the visual part of the gas production when you play with vacuum or pressure.
Some say that their production is more efficient with help of vacuum.
But....the totall kg of hydrogen produced is the same at the end.
I just came back with 20 liters of bi distilled water and a certain resin that i can use for make more 200 liters of it...


The conduction is 3 micro siemens


Now i just need to rewound my primAry and substitute some diodes here


i think they got burned with the unipolar pulses they are 60 amps 600v ultra fast diodes and the one in the coil actually got really really hot

Add a small computerfan on the hole VIC, Seb. If you are lack of those, then i can send you some....
 
Steve
 
 
I found that the magnet dont cause mutch effect on this new transformer.. i believe that is because the primary winding is much wider than the other i tested before.. So the exact effect of the other transformer was having the primary about 3 cm wide and the magnet being 1cm  between north and pole...




I got the exact pulse wave form meyer showed... thru the water thought. Using the big green inductor connected the way i showed in that drawing... vic by sebosfato

now i just need to get into resonace...

I tried to attack on the 110 volts line but my dimmer burned in 5 seconds got also my irfp250 burned too... i will go buy a fuse and will connect straight to the line again=)... i will buy some of them...
And i need to go buy some more diodes and mosfets...

Is because i don't have a variac so im connecting straight to the line..

Alright  Fabio. Closer then ever.
Maybe a scopeshot?????
 
 
Hi all,

Sometimes i cut and past some stuff from other forums into Ionizationx.
Here is some writings of H2power, who was once a member here.
His theory is that the ionized ambient air from the intake is taking watervapour apart into the hydrogen/oxygen components.
I think its worth reading.

br
Steve




You will find that the Gas Processor is hooked up in reverse on one of the patents, the negetive got put on the inside electrod when it is supposed to be on the outside electrod, and note where the voltage fields are. Stanley Meyer also didn't show the EEC, so for those that can't figure that one out, it goes just after the gas processor too consume freshly ejected electrons.

Here is a video giving an idea what is going on inside of the Gas Processor: YouTube - Lec 10 | MIT 6.013 Electromagnetics and Applications, Fall 2





Gauss all that is needed is atomized water mist that has been given a positive charge, ionized oxygen atoms, and recirculated exhuast gases. The WFC is not needed. The job of Stanley Meyer's injectors was to give the water mist a positive charge, and to bypass any vehical's fuel system. The steam resonators job is to keep the water at near boiling point aproximently 90 degrees same as in the video show here: http://video.google.com/videosearch?...=4&ct=title #

The VIC is just a transformer there is no magic in it, it is just a type of transformer that is not commonly built it relies on capacitive reactance too develope its high voltage same as in some of the police zap guns. The blocking diodes job is to double the voltage in the capacitors voltage zones since the Gas Processor is also a capacitor. The electron extraction ciruict provides a postive mesh screen positioned just after the gas processors voltage zone and consumes the freshly stripped electrons before they can form ozone, remember like charges repel and unlike charges attract. The mesh screen is positive and the electrons are negetive, the intake systems gas speeds take care of the rest.

It is the oxygen that is breaking down the water molecule. We all know that it takes 1836kJ/mol to break the bonds of the water molecule, right? The oxygen has been stripped of electrons, and in Stanley Meyer's case, to it's fourth ionization level that has an energy content of 7469.2 kJ/mol. This is far more energy needed to break the bonds of the water molecule. Everyone keeps looking for some form of magic when there is none.

Since Meyer says he used the 4th energy level or lower lets look at that reaction.
The new reaction to form the water molecule at the 4th energy level:
2 H-H bonds 872 kJ/mol and 1 O=O bond 7469.2 kJ/mol are formed yeilding 8341.2 kJ/mol. The net sum of the reaction now is 8341.2-1836 = +6505.2 kJ/mol.
Can you see the reaction now? In the reaction just shown the energy to break the bonds of the water molecule has been subtracted(1836kJ/mol) from the energy content of the ionized oxygen atoms. These are energy content calculations, and it is good to note that gasoline has an energy content of only 495kJ/mol. This is how Stanley Meyer was able to run an 1.6L engine with an hho production rate of only 7L/min.. The energy content is far greater than that of gasoline, more than 13 times greater.

The injectors are not what they appear to be, they are giving the water mist a positive charge and mixing that water mist with ionized air gases and recirculate exhaust gases, then spark ignited. Again no magic here just a simple ionic reaction taking place. I am not going to let someone come in here and give information that will not work. I put science and math to the works of Stanley Meyer, showed where the energy was really coming from, and it is something everyone can sink their teeth into. It is not a magic show it is something real.

I just hope and pray that everyone can see what has been done here. Energy independence is now ours for the taking





Build the Gas Processor for starters and as you start to study on what is needed this video shows two parts of the Gas Processor the positive and negetive voltage zones: YouTube - Lec 10 | MIT 6.013 Electromagnetics and Applications, Fall 2

More information on the Gas Processor see the attatchment for the injectors: Stanley Meyer: Water Electrolysis -- Canadian Patent # 2067735 -- Water Fule Injection System
Then you will have to find an injector system that you can add in a high positive voltage zone to give the water mist a negetive charge same princable as a Taylor cone or Lord Kevins water battery YouTube - Walter Lewin Makes a Battery out of Cans and Water .

Follow Stanley Meyer on this one, though at this point the whole process became too simple, for he got rid of the WFC, but he kept everyone thinking that he did not, and he started missleading everyone for patent protection purposes. The Gas Gun shows a gas processor that is worth copying.

If you look at the patent and take a good look at the injectors you will notice that he says it is an isolated circuit yet it is bolted right to the head of the engine. The water injectors are not little WFC's they are to give the water molecules a charge, mix all of the need componets(ionized air gases, recirculated exhaust gases, and atomized water mist), and spark ignite it. The whole set up bypasses any vehicals existing fuel system and computer controls, but it is not the only way to get the job done. For what Stanley Meyer was trying to do it worked perfectly.

All three needed items can be delivered seperatly as you have already guessed(atomized water mist, ionized air gases, and recirculated exhuast gases). Then it becomes a trick to find which type of vehicals fuel system works well for this. Now Guass has it also right, you can get the job done with hho, but then you have to make sure that the hho mixture will never back flash for if it does with this much energy content there goes the intake system of the engine, gasous injectors are the safest route to go like that. Not sure how much hho will be needed to, but follow Stanley Meyer's lead and shoot for a pressurized system that maintains the hho at 15 psi or so.

I am for the water mist since that way is simplest and safest. And any water source can be used since it will be the ionized air gases breaking down the water molecules, and not some form of electronlysis. All of the frequency stuff can be found in the patent from 10k-50k Hz and Meyer gives his reasoning. When you let the ionized oxygen atoms break down the water molecule the whole system get very easy, do your homework and you will see  .

Well, I hope that helps,

Best Regards,
h2opower.