Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Steve

1,613 posts · 384 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Dec 2007 and Dec 2025

An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

i know what looks like but i dont really trusted the guy... he seems to know too much about everything so little hard to believe.. however is a good idea about the cathode insulation but it become a dbd could it be able to fracture the molecules? well the fracture cell says it can

what you think about this ?

12 years ago, he was a known figure in the OU world.
I just found it intresting that he also uses bemf pulses and eec circuit to create electricity.
The hho as a by product is a bonus.

To be honest, i dont care if he used an insulated kathode. If i am back home in 2 months, i will build two test cells which one has an insulated kathode and the othe one not.
Easy testing....
I want to see if i can get 100dc out at 1 amp....
That 100watts....
Even if it is pulsed.
quote:


As your voltage source moves past zero deg. it has 0 volts of output. However, the voltage is increasing quickly. So, the electric field strength in the dielectric of the cap is changing quickly, and as the field get's stronger, it pushes more electrons out fo the positive side plate (due to increasing electric force on them created by the field). It's important here to realize that a cap is an open circuit essentially, just a specially shaped one. Therefore, current does not flow through a capacitor (ideal one here, we can talk about effect of leakage later if you like), but rather to or from one plate or the other. This causes an electric field to build in the dielectric which affects the free electrons on the other plate via electric force. To explain all that physics, we need to get into Guass' law, etc. so I won't do that here. Each plate is a relatively large chunk of conductive metal, so lots of free electrons exist in it. Many many more than are involved in a reasonable level of current flow. So, the voltage difference between plates, generated by your source will push free electrons from the negative side of the source onto the plate it's connected to. This builds an electric field within the dielectric of the cap such that electrons are pushed by the electric force out of the opposite plate. The circuit carries them back to the positive leg of your source. As more and more charge is pushed into the negative plate, the field grows stronger and more electrons are pushed off the other plate. However, since the rate of change of voltage is slowing as we reach max voltage (at 90 deg), our field strength is still increasing, but more slowly all the time. For that reason, fewer and fewer electrons are pushed off the positive plate per unit time (so current flow is getting smaller). At the point of max voltage, the rate of voltage change is zero, so there are zero more electrons being pushed off that positive plate. At that point the voltage begins to fall ,and the field weakens. This allows some of the pushed out electrons from the positive plate to come back into it. As the voltage rate of change accelerates and the voltage itself falls back toward zero volts, the rate at which electrons return to the positive plate accelerates (current rises). When the voltage is at zero, it's changing at it's max rate, so you have max current flow in the circuit (electrons are coming back to the plate as fast as they ever will for this circuit). The other half of the waveform (negative lobe of the voltage sinusoid) is the same, but switch the plates I'm calling negative and positive since voltage reverses at this point (current doesn't of course, it reversed at the 90 deg point, and will again at 270).

I suppose it could be written up more elegantly, but do you get my meaning here. Can you picture the effect of the field within the cap's dielectric and it's relationship to to electrons flowing out of or into the plates? (positive and negative voltages are not really that, they just indicate that they are associated with current vectors of opposite direction)
Good question!

it seems like other drawings of him so i believe so.. .i saw it before..  but it was recently in the last 5 years...

do you think it could be a fake? or misleading?
 
after some sleep i realized one thing... this two optocouplers are connected one to a circuit having a frequency generator having 99% duty cycle... and the second optocoupler control the duty cycle...

those full wave forms probably just tell is a unregulated dc

The two photocouplers are totally right. One is for the frequency and the other one is for the gating.
I also like the rest of the details.
What i miss is the EEC......
I think that that part is missing....
Hi,I had an interesting conversation with a man from the beginning of the topic....half of his explanation I understood and half I did not.

He use Dave Lawton PLL as a signal generator and yes, you can buy  or just buy PCB, two Stanley Meyer's HV switches, not complicated to make. I got that part how to connect PLL to 2x switches but rest is unclear to me. I was hoping to get answers from people who understand is but  this went over my head  ??? Yes, this may seem like he  explains *  how to drive a car, but that's how it is  ;D

"The WFC Circuit is just a Rectifier & Two ‘Stanley Meyer High Voltage Switches’ where one Switch Charges the WFC Gated at LC Resonance with an 8XA Coil & the other Switch ‘Short Circuits’ the WFC & by-passes the 8XA Coil at LC Resonance into an external ‘Light Bulb & Battery Array’ Load as the Electron Extraction Circuit… A Variable Inductor is used for Tuning the Circuit. This is Very SIMPLE & will produce a Minimum of 300% Faraday’s to 1,700% Faraday’s simple Electrolysis at around 0.05 Amps or 1/20th of an Amp… Once this is understood, you can start using Toroids, Ignition Coils or Tesla Coils."


"All you need is the 'Potential and the Frequency'. The Electrons can come from the Power (Enslavement) Grids Neutral, an Earthed Rod in your Back Yard or the Covalent Bonds in Water itself. In Auckland New Zealand and Darwin of Australia people have been using the 'LIVE' Phase connection from the Power Grid and an Earthed Rod as a Neutral to power their Hydrponic Lights for years... In New Zealand a guy in debt to a Motor Cycle Gang gave them A Box that when connected to a 'LIVE'  Phase and a separate Earth powered a Warehouse with Electrons from the Earth ...All your interested in is the Potential and Frequency
Just look at (Google) 'A Vector Potentials'.?
If you have the original Lawton PLL you can hook up to any switch directly from the Diode Light to an optociuple. If you have the original SCR you can hook the Diode Light up to the side connections that you'd normally connect any Frequency Generator to.?
So you have your Dave Lawton Pll just remove the Switch and connect three wires that you can then connect to your optocouple. Easy!... you really need to Switch BACK-EMF Im-Pulses and not Hot Electricity from a Variac.?
If you understand how to remove the LED and hook it to your SCR then all you do is build two SCR Circuits and instead of using an SCR you pick out a PNP and an NPN so you get an alternation using the same signal. So one Switch Charges the WFC and the other Switch Short Circuits it using a Variac Transformer. The gist of it, is Charging the Water Fuel Cell then Short Circuiting it, the PLL will do this automatically... The reason Faradays Electrolysis gets Hot is because it is the Load, using the Stanley Meyer method the Load is external to the Water Fuel Cell, it still uses Amperage but externalises the Heat/EM Losses component into a Light Bulb... It's like Charging a Battery and it gets Hot because it is the Load while its Charging but, when you discharge the Battery like in a Laptop the Pentium Chip gets Hot because it's the Load and the Laptop Battery remains Cold to touch, so a Stanley Meyer Water Fuel Cell externalises the Load. Once you get this, then you'll get that the most efficient way to charge a Capacitor that stores Charge is to use Back EMF Im-Pulses then you'll see your efficiencies increase! ... It's all about externalising the Heat component then increasing the efficiency of the Cell, my Cells hooked up to a 3.25 KVA generator- if School Girls in Africa can build this SHIT with Junk Parts anyone in the Western World can build this!?
... The simplest way for you to hook it up is, instead of the PLL Switch going to the Cell, you need to remove that Switch. You need to directly Switch your Optocouple so you need to remove that Switch and Solder it up yourself because it is a NEGATIVE Switch. Your just making it hard for yourself not removing the Switch from your PPL Circuit because you need that Positive Signal. Once this is done you'll have Two POSITIVE Switch outputs: 1. The Light Emitting Diode & 2. The Positive Signal that previously Switched the NEGATIVE Switch that you have now removed. SIMPLE! If you built your own SCR Circuit you can easily build another one OK. ... You need a NPN so you can collect the Back EMF Im-Pulses off the NEGATIVE at Switch Closure using Blocking Diodes on the Negative. ... You also need a PNP and what this does is it only Switches ON when the Pin is NEGATIVE so the same signal Switches Two separate Switches. The NPN Charges the Cell with Back EMF Im-Pulses and the PNP Short Circuits the Cell with a Light Bulb on the Positive of the Cell to CONSUME all Amperage from the Water Fuel Cell... Its NOT Rocket Science!?


All you do is remove it and you need the Potentential and the Neutral and you can use the one signal to power two seperate Opto-Couples with one Opto for the NPN which has Diodes off the Negative of a Coil to collect the Back-EMF Im-Pulses that go to the Positive of your Water Fuel Cell and the Negative Side of your Water Fuel Cell is connected to the Positive Side of your Coil... I know this sounds like it doesn't make sense but, the Water Fuel Cell is only being Charged with Back EMF Im-Pulses when the NPN closes. then seperate to this the other Opto is for the PNP which has a Light Bulb on the Positive Side of the Water Fuel Cell then the PNP. SO WHEN THIS IS FED WITH A SQUARE WAVE YOU GET AN ALTERNATING SIGNAL : P, N,P, N, P, N, P ECT.  you can even Postulate the OFF NPN's Back-EMF Im-Pulse takes place while the Short Circuit PNP is On and therefore the Light Bulb is powered by the Back EMF Im-Pulse but it can't because theres no Amperage therefore the Amperage can only come from the Water Fuel Cell Capacitor. during its Short Circuit. You'll know when its built right"

So you had contact with the man of the video,s?

Thanks for posting, btw. I need some days to proces this. I will make a schematic as good as i understand ....


cheers
after all these years of collecting info and doing tests, my best gues would be that you keep a dc current on the sparkplug in such a way that it creates a bit of hho in a constant way, probably similar to the Meyer sparkplug injector.
Then add on top of the dc the normal ignition voltage for the bang spark....
Then you have that plasma spark amd a bit of hho that would create a reaction with the waterdrops..

a thermo explosion reaction.
Run you engine first hot on petrol before you do the watertesting.....Believe me....it makes a diff.

There was a guy who visit Nathen and got the original engine in hands. Together with Nathen they tried to re start it again.
It did not work.
The question is why......
Is making a youtube movie of a fake water using engine so funny?
Or did Nathen really not wanna share?

Here are some videos of  a college tester builder. Is he right?
Any idea what his setup looks like?

update:

My Circuit is just a Dave Lawtons Phase Locked Loop (PLL) Circuit with a 240 Volt Variac Transformer, a 600 Volt SDR943-61 rectifier, a H11D1 Optocoupler with a 100 Ohm 25W Resistor and a C38M SCR connected to a a 8XA Choke with a 1N1188 Blocking Diode. . Every cubic foot of water contains 1,376 cubic feet of Hydrogen & 680 cubic feet of Oxygen. 12Volts at 0.5Amps =6W(Watts) & produces 8 Liters of HHO/Minute. Stanley Meyer states WATER is 2.5 times more explosive than Petrol, so a V8 4.7 L/100 Kilometers requires only 1.88 L/100 K of WATER = 2,586.88 L of Hydrogen. 43.11 L Hydrogen/Minute = 33W. . http://www.courtiestown.co.uk/electrolysers/dave-lawton/dave-lawton-pll-built-pcb.html Courtiestown in the UK no longer exists... So you can no longer buy any of the Dave Lawton Kits...



cheers
Steve