This allows the use of offset voltages, for extended range. The patent gives the schematics for both the probe and the differential amplifier. This shouldn't be too hard to build for someone with basic electronics skills. However, I'm also reading that some skill is required for setting the distance between the probe's two input pins. There may be other crucial factors as well, which could discourage someone from doing a DIY build.
I'll put in the time to check a little further, although this research isn't relevant to anything I need myself.
Water going into the cell should be cold. This allows it to retain dissolved gasses until processed and also keeps the cell cool during operation. Water vapor is added at a subsequent stage, and should be hot.
I've been reading some of the available liturature relating to dissolved gasses in water. The temperature of the water plays an important role. Gasses are more readily disolved in cold water, with an example being the carbonator pump used for soda fountains. On the other hand, gasses bubbled through hot water produces gas which is rich in water vapor. An example of this would be bubbling exhaust gases through hot water, to produce hot CO2 laden with water vapor. (If using at least some amount of petrol.)
I've also been wondering if anyone has tried using carbonated water in their Meyer cell? Siemens has recently developed a synthetic diesel process involving reacting CO2 with water, at 800 degrees.
The cell seems to be a rod inside a tube, both connected at the bottom, with the tube also connected at the top to a wide band around the outer water jacket containment vessel.
I think the waveform in this picture is very important. I've been wondering about the difference in total energy of a pulse train in which each pulse starts at the bottom, compared to a sequential fluctuation with increasing amplitude. Since Stan appears to have used the latter, this may hold part of the key to his amp restricting technique.
I have been banned from more forums than most this sounds funny to me as I have been banned from this site, the energetic site, Max's site, the RWG site, and the all about circuits site.
The difference being that when YOU get banned it's a defensive measure to stop your determination to disrupt the other members' attempts to discuss something. Nothing unrighteous about this kind of banning.
Forums where members are banned arbitrarily and capriciously, often in secret, have diminished value as a result. What is the value of that forum with free energy implied in it's name, other than some place to exchange ideas? Has any over unity system been shown there, for others to replicate? If OU were claimed, WOULD anyone try to replicate it? I've come to the conclusion that the key to energy independence, for a specific individual, isn't posting to obscure forums.
Rain can melt sand. Rather, it melts the pile. The pile then flows with the water. Several years ago they found out water in the form of super heated steam penetrating through a granite mass under pressure turns the granite plasticene. This plasticene can then flow outwards into cracks in the larger mass blasted by a previous shock wave. With repetition, liquid metal can finally be mixed in when the asteroid bore hole is large enough, to form a casing.
Water has the power to empower industry. But which has the most raw power? Explosively decompressing, super heated water? Or an energetically augmented fuel/air explosive made with the same amount of water? Tesla said that the energy which can be put onto a capacitor will always exceed that of a chemical explosive, because there is no limit to how much energy can be put onto a capacitor. With decompressing water, the power would be limited somewhat to the energy represented by the temperature, that of the pressure, and the inter molecular binding energy contained by the original mass of water. (With coalescence, some of the mass subverged into cohesion energy). But, with a Carbon-Hydrogen LENR output included (electron catalysis), the enhanced fuel and air mixture would give the biggest blast. And the greatest gain.
Moving ahead with this circuit, I ordered a hand full of N channel semiconductors. The ones my supplier had on sale are 200 V @ 20 Amps. So I may try paralleling 2 or 3. Or I can try using a current limiting capacitor on the input to the coils. Or even use a single ignition coil.
Also, a MOT takes quite a bit less than 20 Amps, so I can use the circuit to provide a high frequency environment for the Radiant Energy spark circuit I recently posted.
And I have opened an ignition coil casing before, to remove the core. The hard part was keeping it from leaking afterwards.
And, of course, I always have a variety of other projects I can work on while I'm waiting for the shipment.
That's an amazing circuit, in it's simplicity. Thanks for posting it; I guarantee I'm going to use it for something. And I have spent some amount of time wondering how to wire up anti-parallel transformers. What's the advantage of doing that? EMI filter, so the MOSFET can keep it's smoke?
We also have to consider the magnetic curl. The way the flux lines curl around the wire. With a motor, the curl goes one way, and the curls go the other way with a generator.
Can you use the same wire for both the motor and generator?
The point of this whole thread is to find out if anyone saw Stan's setup with two VICs. I saw two EPGs under the dune buggy hood. And that 'pickup coil' being slightly smaller than the primary, could easily be switched in as a higher frequency driver winding. That higher, substitute pulse frequency could be switched in during the 'supposed' relaxation time. Any free electrons could be extracted with the top ring and a different circuit.
Sorry again. I wasn't demanding discussion; I just felt it was a little rude to ask me to post something, then blow it off.
If you want to find the resonant em frequency, take the MEV value of the reaction, then convert it with Boltzmann's Constant. Every voltage has a corresponding frequency, every frequency has a wavelength, every wavelength has a temperature.
The forums are quiet? The time is coming when only the Trolls are left, waiting for someone to say something important, so they can jump in with an overwhelming distraction.
Why ask me to repeat something if you're not going to comment this time either? Just change the subject again.
Sorry I'm getting a little testy. When I join a group, it's hoping to get some discussion. I'm not interested in posting a blog strictly about my own ideas. I think I should step back and take a break.
I forgot to also mention that when fusion energy is extracted resonantly, the alternative kinetic kick does not occur. There may be neutrons but they would be cold, and moving too slow to penetrate anything.
Sorry, I forgot which thread this subject was originally discussed on. He had a sealed glass sample tube - around one inch by three or four inches - of USP grade Hydrogen. He had an rf Helicon coil wrapped around the tube, and energy from this coil converted the internal gas into plasma. This had a bright red appearance. During the several minutes of operation, the color gradually changed to purple (red plus blue), which indicated the formation, and presence of, Helium, inside the sealed tube. He said this was due to spontaneous fusing of H into He. And this happened because he had a second coil loosely wrapped around the outside of everything else, with this coil resonating at a specific frequency. The fact that this secondary tank circuit would 'ground' the fusion energy is what allowed the reaction to occur.
He also said that he was informed during an official visit that he had stumbled onto a state secret. (In England). He did not say he was ordered to not talk about it.
During our entire discussion at the private group, he never would say what the extraction frequency is, but this might be deduced by examining his equipment. The outer pick-up coil's inductance would be easy to estimate, but the tank's capacitor was around 10" in diameter, with a vacuum dielectric, and a large number of plates. So what was it's value? He wouldn't say.
In my opinion, his demonstration proved that fusion isotopes can form spontaneously when the right frequency of energy is EXTRACTED from a plasma, rather than input. So the only input which is needed is for ionization.