Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

electrotek

104 posts · 15 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Oct 2013 and Dec 2021

An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Did Meyer Use Two Frequencies?

#5 · date not recorded

Stepherson showed us the isotopes form spontaneously when the USP gas container is placed at the center of the air core rf transformer.  Perhaps you can pull electricity from the resonant circuit as it's being produced.  Using the visible size of his pickup coil (the larger, secondary winding) and estimating the vacuum capacitor value would resolve the fusion operating frequency.

Did Meyer Use Two Frequencies?

#2 · date not recorded

Another way to use two signals is to apply them sequentially.  A first string of pulses sets up a resonant elastic sloshing back and forth between the electrodes, then a discordant frequency 'shatters' the resonance, ripping the molecules apart.

Did Meyer Use Two Frequencies?

#1 · date not recorded

At least a few people have replicated the VIC, but all I've ever seen are mediocre results.  And this includes videos of Stan's own equipment in action.  I'm thinking that maybe he left something out of his presentations.  None of the cells he showed produced anywhere near enough gas to run a VW.  And the way he operated his injectors brought the hho in from somewhere else - the injectors didn't split the water which was injected to control the burn rate.

I don't remember seeing the cell he used on the dune buggy.  But I did see two EPG units under the hood  Presumably, these units produced the pulse trains, rather than VICs, for this application.  But why two of them?  My view is that he was combining out of phase waveforms to produce a type of ionizing exotic energy, and this energy is capable of generating significant amounts of gas.  And if this is what was being done, it should also work with two VICs.  Has anyone seen a setup with two driver circuits?
That's actually an application number.  These aren't kept on file indefinately.  About your only chance of getting it is if someone downloaded it back then.

Meyer refered to it as "co pending".  It may have been granted as a patent, or he could have abandoned it.  This can happen if all the claims are duplicated in a subsequent patent.  But, the abandoned application could still have contained key information not included in a subsequent filing.

Hope you can find it and share it with us.