Alan

Xc must be smaller than Xl, so it's an impedance mismatch between chokes and wfc, agree? But this is also frequency dependent.
Bt why are they matched early on in the brief?
RF occurs as spikes during the edges (puharich).

And still, reflection (RF spikes reflected back from wfc to chokes) keeps entering my mind. 
Voltage is seen then, but no power is absorbed by wfc.
 
something like that, forgot it a bit because of the twisted stuff lately.

The electrons were taken out of h2o but not extracted from the wfc, it contributes to further dissociation by colliding with other h2o and / or forming h2 and o2. I think this can be called ionization by collision.
If I remember correctly, in the NZ lecture he said an EEC on the wfc was not recommended.

The free floating electrons are used to create o2 and h2 from the single atoms, and to dissociate h2o like regular electrolysis:

The liberated and moving atoms (having missing electrons) regain or capture the free floating
electrons once applied voltage is switched-off during pulsing operations.
...

Subjecting or exposing the water molecule to even higher voltage levels causes the liberated atoms to
go into a "state" of gas ionization.
Each liberated atom taking-on its own "net" electrical charge.

The ionized atoms along with free floating negative charged electrons are, now, deflected (pulsing electrical
voltage fields of opposite polarity) through the  Electrical Polarization Process … imparting or
superimposing a second physical-force (particle-impact) unto the electrically charged water bath. (electrolysis by reaction of e- with h2o)
Oscillation (back and forth movement) of electrically charged particles by way of voltage deflection is
hereinafter called "Resonant Action", as illustrated in Figure (1-10).
...

Applied together, electrical forces (TT') and (UU'), now, causes these moving electrically charged particles to
superimpose a physical impact unto electrical polarization process (160), as shown in (170) of Figure (3-
25) ... thereby, increasing gas-yield (88) still further.
...

It is Also Meaningless since the Super high voltages across the cell produces hardly any gas. Its more of an useless standing wave.

hmm, I always believed this had to be achieved.
I'd say, try to vary the width of 2 small plates which forms the cell.

Too bad no more info.
Only thing I know is high voltage, high frequency, I think HF spikes [mhz/ghz?], but LF repetition rate [khz] created by transients.

I think the same can be accomplished with a stungun, which nowadays approaches 1MV
I wonder what happens when the frequency can be fine tuned, guess meyer did exactly that: easy tunable teslacoil by altering pulse rate.

The disruptive discharge of a capacitor through a sparkgap allows such natural oscillations without pulling more power from the source when the coil is shorted, all energy is delivered by the cap.
this is what i understand from richieburnett site about teslacoils.

I know, blablabla
but this is what I think is happening.
guess the same may happen with the hairpin circuit when tuning is possible - no hho occured when a lamp on the hairpin was put into water, tuning the sparkgap by quenching may help, with 2 concetric tubes and no lamp.

the coil that is used in the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU9B1YfkEqo&NR=1#

Tesla Igniting surface of Water with High Frequency
 

I think this shows very crude how meyer's system will work.
finetuning it will give constant flames

I think those are the same as the other vic's, except without the transformer coils  (primary/scondary combination), since signal 49 refers to 10v pulsed.
voltage is enhanced by SS and copper coils only (10-5), more of these in the stack gives higher voltages.

lol never heard of it, looks like its about putting trains of thought on paper.

Very nice brainfart .

So how it is we do this now heh ?

Superstring theory I guess.

Haven't read much of your posts here lately, too much for me atm
but you said matter and light are the same, and I came to a similar conclusion with some open questions:

an electron

is clearly a standing wave.
Matter is a standing wave on the substance of space-time. Spacetime gets concentrated by C2 giving it the properties of matter, this costs and thus stores energy.
What is gravity: imagine a rope with both ends tied to rubber bands, now swing
the center of the rope until standing waves occur, the ends pull the rubber bands towards the inside.
Standing waves of matter is pulling space-time's elastic properties inwards the same way, as a result a gravity (potential) occurs.

Light is a traveling wave, this is the reason light flows over the space-time surface (with zero resistance, defined by the waves E and B and space-time's u and m) and matter doesn't.
Light isn't a standing wave, thus no properties matter and zero mass is measured.
Positrons are anti matter, meaning? negative mass makes no sense, it must have something to do with the properties of  its standing wave.
Instead of pulling (contracting) space-time, it expands it?

What keeps a standing wave in motion? Some interlocking mechanism or a constant flow of energy... self energy?
Can its oscillating source interact with traveling waves (light), thus increasing the energy? Is this the way matter absorbs photons? No one knows what photons are, but everyone thinks he/she knows. They are a huge mystery.
Are light and matter on opposite sides of the same coin, with the only difference the type of wave?

Thus ends my brainfart.

c is the viscosity of spacetime
and light travels on it without resistance

What aspect of the atmosphere proves "molecule creation from scratch"?

fellas we are stumbling into the basic of quantum mechanics!!  i know if you guys really know what stan does to get the electron particle generator to work you know what im talking about.. stan hints on it a little bit.   stan was saying that you can bond atoms that have never been bonded before because  your able to strip enough electrons to make it happen.. the electron particle generator.. has a magnetic gas inside it.. magnetic gas doesnt exist at ambient tempatures.. stan quantim mechnicaly made it.. he used his vic with electrodes present by iron powder and argon gas. when placed under high voltage he would pluck electrons from argon and was able to get metal ions to bond.metal  ions all spin the same way and they produce a emf.. stan is also the inventor of man made magnetic gas..   chemistry bonds occur between 1-10 volts..

yeah he said that, amazing stuff and what  he explains makes perfectly sense, but is it is reality? hope we'll find out.

Time Travel Research Center  lol

thanks for the docs

http://www.unusualresearch.com/scalarbib/scalarbib.htm
this one is cool
http://www.unusualresearch.com/scalarbib/djvu/SovietApotential.djvu

dl this to view djvu
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=32953&package_id=78509

hey again
sharp little voltage gradients, as bearden said, will stress the dirac sea (= neutrino's ) and electrons will appear, because electron and positron get separated, this can cause electrolysis.
makes sense, not sure if it is real.

I am not the best at explaining things, so i understand ppl think I talk nonsense, but I do my best.

kinesis posted 2 pics which showed that both chokes create a current towards the wfc, while the voltages on both sides are both + or -, demartin confirmed this (he also edited the pics), he also said this is the only setup that gave him something of a resonant behaviour.

the pic in this post has the second choke counterwound like you said (did you say that at all, or did you mean something else?), now it has +/- voltage polarities over the cell instead of +/+.

This is exactly the same at the classical bifilar (see below): just imagine the 2nd choke wound along with the 1st (both toward N).
no exactly the same, there is no distributed capacitance between the 2, but there will be when wound as 6-1

What i am talking about?
read the new idea thread

wait i'll post a pic

the winding direction isn't the same?
if so, in 8-3, all fields are induced with the same polarity, and the second choke current isn't towards the wfc, so opposing voltages on the wfc.
demartin observed that the pulses on both sides were of the same polarity in the exact 8-3 setup.

The shaded coil is SS the not shaded is regular copper.  Or vice versa if you want.  One is copper and the other is SS,  That is for the internal windings ie chokes, the primary and seconday are both copper.

No, wait, in 10-4, copper (magnetic) points to shaded, non shaded is SS: signal 49 on SS would be like 10-1 to 10-3, so what is copper used for??

perhaps this is the truth:

The effect of the increased impedance is strikingly illustrated in the two experiments of Prof. Bjerknes when copper is deposited upon an iron wire, and next iron upon a copper wire.  Considerable thickness of copper deposit was required in the former experiment, but very little thickness of iron in the latter, as should be expected.

http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-12-21.htm

(sorry for the thread hijack )

Secondary pickup coil is bifilar wound in this pic.

also compare the second pic (pulse from battery) to 10-4

The copper wire of 10-4 seems to be secondary bifilar wrapped as in 8-10.
another hint to this is:

Resonant Charging Chokes Stages (56/62a xx 56/62n + SS56/62a xxx SS56/62n) of Figure (10- 
4) that are not only electrically connected in sequential order but likewise magnetically linked by
Inductance Coupling field (511/512a xxx 511/512n), as so pictorially illustrated in (580) of Figure
(6-1).

which are, when you look at 6-1, the inductance coupling fields of the chokes and secondary.
Think about this: how would you wind the coils if secondary pickup coil is bifilar wound like 8-10?

Really a mystery, no clear explanation at all.