Alan

His work is very neat:
http://www.youtube.com/user/skycollection

Wasn't GEET based on something similar?

This is very interresting indeed . Plz tell us more . You saw a wave on your scope with both negative and positive " same voltage " the same moment in time . Kinda like figure 10-5 of the tech brief 

Or similar to this @ 1:17, positive and negative type voltage (energy?) pulses?

@All
The connection is of little importance...no matter what, you wind it the same way. Two wires at the same time...just have it terminate at some posts (like the VIC pic)...after that, you can test which way we want to go in (either opposite sides...or same side) simple testing will show u. So calm down!



"I know one thing....that I know nothing at all"

@Haithar
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Solenoid.svg&filetimestamp=20061113180033

That is the resultant flow of the wires in "series"...it's only 2D...In real life it looks like a double sided vortex.

You tried to coat the electrodes with silicon sand, right? What were your findings?

voltage collapsed through the water, at least you know amps were inhibited properly.

what would happen to the lower transitor ?

Blow up ?

I'd put the gate frequency on the enable pin of the primary frequency 555, to prevent crosstalk.

If you know the efficiency, you can make as much liters as wished, efficiency of electrolysis is known and won't give surprising results when trying to reinvent it, how much l/h would nasa generate for their rockets ;
perhaps with pulsing it wont heat up so much - it won't give you more than faraday's limit of, what was it, 60 percents?

this is a demonstration of a different approach.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQCvvCngev0&feature=channel_page
based on drstiffler's work, he is known for his practical approach and without too much theory.
i posted some articles captured to pdf, which are not available anymore on his site. the rapidshare link has expired, if you don't have the files anymore i'll fetch em from my other hdd. [e.zip]

lol yeah, it is written in patent 4936961, somewhere else was written "the secondary _MAY_ include 2 chokes" - something like that.
if you're done with the jackhammer approach and/or believe meyer is invalid, try looking into avramenko plug and what frolov and stiffler said, it's a totally different and a more subtle approach to electrolysis.
I wonder what would happen if a primary of a transformer is placed on an avramenkoplug and the freq is tuned.

Amp restriction isn't non-amps.

The graph doesnt state if 12.5V is applied to the cell or to the transformer.

  0 khz is steady DC

lol ok thanks, gonna look for a huge wannabe-futuristic looking tv

do you know the make of the TV?
maybe I can find one at city dump

So it really is possible for 'static' voltage fields to do work for free:

Which one do you think is correct?
I think the second is.

Core pulsing at the resonant frequency of the chokes [each is a parallell LC tank], maximum voltage will develop with positive at the dot, while having an infinite impedance.


The dots are the positive EMF according to Lenz law.

Great find this wire manufacturer
I looked it up, meyers wire had a specific resistance of .0048 ohm-foot , so  42 is huge compared to this.

What I meant by if the chokes would survive the emf is, the wire of both chokes in the last turn towards the wfc, have a potential difference of 40KV:

all dielectric coatings having an effective 3KV per mil dielectric value

see what I mean?
Or I just don't understand

exactly, aiding bifilars would create an intens magnetic flux intensity, squared.
would the twisted chokes survive the emf?

When sending power down a transmission line, it is usually desirable that as much power as possible will be absorbed by the load and as little as possible will be reflected back to the source. This can be ensured by making the load impedance equal to Z0, in which case the transmission line is said to be matched. Ensuring the source impedance matches Z0 will maximize power transfer from the source to the transmission line, but has no other effect on the behavior of the line.

can we say that because  Xl > Xc, current lags voltage, thus minimal power is absorbed by the wfc as a load, and most power is reflected towards the source [choke], thus creating standing waves?

Negative voltage is created when electrons flow towards the negative electrode, also 90 degree out of phase, during the first 90 degrees negative voltage aoppear on the wfc, but no electron flow, [=strange] they are 'clustered', only voltage gets propagated to the wfc - after 90, electrons flow to the wfc.

 now, why does the magnetic field created by the primary, create a positive emf in the negative choke [towards the wfc], and a negative emf on the negative side of the secondary , [towards the 2nd choke]?
A potential difference on 2nd choke tries to form: negative on transformer side, positive on the wfc side. [sum 0v?]

Bedini: cutting off the signal after around 90 degrees when current starts to flow, by using the trigger coil on the transistor (correct me if I'm wrong)
 

good plan, looking forward to some results.

the copper bars are isolated from the transformer, because the dielectric of the capacitors don't conduct, I think the copper can be seen as a dielectric itself, the plates of the caps connected to the copper form a capacitor with the copper as dielectric.
very interesting device, tesla wrote a lot about this, including the mention of something like "energy converted from the aether"

This presentation is awesome
But I doubt it is OU, just a different and more efficient way of illumination by inducing plasma, corona or any other discharges without real currents.
Doesnt mean I'm right

avramenko plug does exactly the same, but for higher frequencies and lower voltages.
I mean, DrStifflers implementation of the plug.