OK, I'll try using something which is higher than 13.4 V, rather than lower.
The static on the plates is what polarizes the molecules. Producing this static takes some amount of current. If the current going to the cell exceeds this amount, the molecules will start moving, which is not what we want.
After the molecules are polarized, the second stage is to jerk the electrons repeatedly, to move them further and further from their molecule, until they are pulled free and the molecule breaks apart. Apparently, the applied pulses take care of both stages - charging the plates and jerking on the electrons.
After watching the MOT spark gap videos I decided to see if just the voltage spikes can produce bubbles. So I wired up a little 6V relay as a buzzer, then powered it with a usb lighter plug and connected it to one of my cells. No bubbles, but I went ahead and took some readings.
With my meter across the cell the voltage was jumping all over, from a few tenths to a few volts. I concluded the cell was charging, but then relaxing before the next pulse. So I'll try increasing the frequency of the buzzer.
After every test I was still reading about a quarter of a volt across the cell, even after 24 hours. Leaving the meter connected slowly drained the charge after an hour. And I could get a fluctuating reading with only one probe to the cell (either polarity), even with the probe wire within a couple of inches. So these inductive spikes do produce a Radiant effect. It's interesting that this happens with either polarity, not with just the positive spikes.
I put a diode on it to see if I could get more than .24 resting volts and that immediately went to a full volt just as the USB plug burned out. When I switched over to some D cells driving the relay, I noticed that I could get a pretty good shock off of it from time to time, without a corresponding reading on the meter. So there must be some static charge building up, in addition to the dc. This effect was intermittent, but will likely become predominate with a higher frequency.
And I'm going to try the MOT spark gap circuit, powered with normal AC, with and without the oven's emi filter.
That was John Worell Keely who said that elemental transmutation can be facilitated by adjusting the temperature of the nuclei. What Meyer said was that, without the electrons to carry off the heat, the Oxygen is processed until it gets hot enough for the nucleus to emit an electron, which causes the Oxygen to disappear. This describes a weak force interaction, and this type of reaction (eg:LENR) releases 100,000 times as much energy as a chemical reaction involving the same amount of mass.
Various people have run the numbers and concluded that Stan was using an infintessimal amount of Hydrogen. So the energy to power the buggy must have come from what he called cold fusion. That's what we should be looking at.
I read a patent which said that Meyer's system is too technically difficult to be practical , due to frequently changing parameters. "Therefor", the patent said, "all that is needed is Tesla's bifilar pancake coil and a spark gap."
It'a been shown that Tesla's coil can have two discrete layers and still function accordingly. All the nXA coils are is just a linear extension of Tesla's concept. So the provided circuit should work, under the patent or not.
But I agree that the important part is what we do with the gas. Meyer pumped all of the thermal electrons out of the gas, then kept using the applied electrical vibrations to continue heating the oxygen nuclei. When these particles get hot enough, an electron or two can be knocked out of the nucleus by an impact, causing a transmutation producing Freon or Helium, and a considerable amount of heat.
No matter how we get the hho, we need to pump thermal electrons. I'm going to start with my T-spark electrodes, two of which melted on the end, pulling thermal electrons from the third, much cooler wire. (This was at 500 miliamps, which is less than one Amp of normal heating current.)
Thanks, Steve. Of course, if you do extend one of the bi-filar windings, you might need to bridge that part of the coil with a trimmer capacitor, for the desired phase shift. It would help to look at it on a scope.
And I don't see why longitudinal waves won't stretch a polar molecule, with the back of it anchored by a static charge.
Someone posted to Keelynet early on that a red LED was attracting a strip of toilet paper. He didn't show his circuit, or say if he had a vibrating metal plate adjacent to the beam, charged or otherwise.
edit: With LE, I would think the plate should be magnetised.
I wonder if this energy Dollard discusses will disintegrate matter, the way Tesla used HIS longitudinal waves to clean a metal film from the inside of a vacuum tube by converting the deposited metal into longitudinal mass?
A Tesla coil CAN produce longitudinal waves, but it would need TWO primary windings, tuned to slightly different wavelengths. Otherwise, what you get is unidirectional, but not longitudinal.
edit: Why was it that Dollard was never able to replicate Ed Gray's Power Conversion Tube, which is based on Tesla's longitudinal wave techniques?
I'm aware that rotation is considered as being a property, rather than a movement. But if something is rotating faster than the speed of light, individual points would still move faster than light and the rotating system would move outside of the universe.
Excellent video Brian. Thanks for all the screen shots.
Here's some more math: One Coulomb equals 6.24 X 10 .exp. 18 One mole equals 6.022 X 10 .exp. 23
Therefore, with one electron per molecule, there's roughly 100,000 Coulomb per kg of water, which is one liter. So we need .01 ml of water to get one Coulomb of charge.
But shouldn't you put that coil in a Faraday cage, to rule out an antenna operation, before concluding it's ZPE?
At any rate, the coil produces a biphasic signal. And so will my hairpin capacitor. (Shown in reply #32 on page #5).
You might try using a cluster of parallel LEDs for each of the diodes. A cheap flashlight has nine. You could judge how bright they are, and see what effect the lower resistance has on the gas production.
My unit is getting close to the testing phase. A lot goin on, but if I can squeeze one thing in each day on this, pretty soon it'll be sitting there.
I verified the fluorescent driver works, and the flashlight LED assembly is ready. I dug out a relay which looks like the one in the video. It's rusty and getting the little steel plunger out will be about the last challenge. Then it's just wiring it up to a cell and seeing what happens.
I can see a lot which might be done with this new circuit, and I may even test my new single-phase shape resonance diode.
I'm wondering: if touching either Cell electrode results in an rf spark, what will happen if an additional polar mass is connected to one of the electrodes? This would be a single wire leading from the cell side of one of the diodes to something like a MOT core. Or perhaps to a single electrode in a second Cell. Remember that a human body is essentially a polar mass itself.
I don't see any relationship between this and Dr. Stiffer's free energy claims. This is something new. It's not even related to the Avramenko diode plug. Attention should be given where it's due. Otherwise, what's the incentive for posting at this site?
And hasn't Stiffer already snubbed an invitation to come here?
I'm starting to get a handle on this. Both diodes are connected to the same transformer wire, with the diodes in reverse polarity and the other transformer wire left open. The inductor is connected to the diode with negative polarity and the inductor's output is connected to the water cell, along with the other diode. The transformer isn't rectified, or fully loaded.
This is an innovative approach to the single wire circuit. Normally, both transformer wires are connected to a spark gap with an adjacent single wire electrode's circuit terminating on a polar mass. (Which in this case would be the water cell). With both approaches, the current flows up one side of the wire and back down the other side of the same wire. At high frequency, these bidirectional currents are simultaneous. Using the two diodes allows it to work with just one side of the supply, which is otherwise unloaded.