tektrical

Quote from: tektrical on June 29, 2020, 14:45:05 pm

They're building a wall along the southern border to keep us in.  When the Shit Hits the Fan, no one gets out.

Is that the mexico wall?

Yes, it is.

They're building a wall along the southern border to keep us in.  When the Shit Hits the Fan, no one gets out.

I do think it's unwise to offer advice without complete clarity of understanding.

My grandfather was a Mason, but he lied about the membership system.  Like any organization, sometimes the scum will rise to the top.  (Certain politicians are a classic example). don't know if their handbook is secret or not, but you might find one at a used book store.  This will give you a basic idea of what they're about, on a low level.

If you join the Lodge, maybe one of the elder members will go to court with you, as a character reference.  (This would give him an extra degree).  But be advised that the organization is a money pit, financed by the new members.  And it does take a long time to move up through the hierarchy.  The 32 degrees in their handbook is just an introduction, representing barely a tenth of the teaching available.

It is through Grace that they are able to drive shiny new cars.  An understanding of the term Satan fell from Grace enables them to cast out the spiritual gold which attracts adversity.

The Masons don't advertise or recruit.  A decision to affiliate with their Lodge, to gain esoteric knowledge and wisdom, has to be someone's own choice.  Moving in harmony is a two way street.

Brushing shoulders is a sign of respect.  Being at the same place at the same time, spontaneously, is an aspect of Grace.  The Masons have a lot of light and there is much you can learn if you seek them out.  There are also forces of darkness in this world and the more potential for light that you have, the more strife which will be thrown at you.  Especially in the business we're in.  I can't tell you what to do, on your own path to Enlightenment, except to keep your chin up and keep moving forward.

These magnetic particles are not Monopoles.  Each particle has a North and a South.  When moving, the particles will line up N-S-N-S.  There won't be any adjacent particles both having the same pole pointing in the same direction, askance to the flow.  So, when a pulse enters a coil, the flux lines will be perpendicular to the coil windings.  As the pulse moves towards, then past the center of a coil, the flux will expand, then contract, as seen by the coil.  This produces a rising, then falling output from the coil.  How this might produce more output than input is a mystery to me.  But it would provide a convenient non electronic pulse generating system.

With electrostatic induction, a ring will 'see' an ion filled bubble when it's at a distance of two and a half times the radius of the bubble.  Anything greater than that is considered as infinity, electrically.  Two rings have to be spaced a little more than two and a half times the diameter of the bubble sitting between them, in order for the rings to be discharged.  If the bubbles are tightly fitting in the riser tube, the rings can be spaced at two and a half times the tube diameter.  And this spacing is between adjacent edges of the rings, discounting the width of the rings.  The number of rings is limited only by the length of the riser.  Which could be dangled from a tall building or even a high altitude balloon.

This thing will either never produce enough energy to generate it's own bubbles, or the bubble stream will require only a specific number of rings to close the loop.  Even if this number is large, many more rings can be added.  Apparently, the charge on the ions doesn't leak off, or else the bubbles would shrink, due to less Coulombic repulsion. 

A regulator could send a series of bubbles through a riser tube surrounded with a number of rings.  A ring which is grounded while a charged bubble passes through it will retain a charge after the bubble and ground connection are gone.  More rings provide more available potential to feed back to the cell.

If you put a vacuum on one end of a long plastic tubing and hold the other end in some steam, closely spaced little plugs of water will form and start flowing through the tube in succession.

A bunch of ionized atomic hydroxy gas particles, injected with the steam, would then form regions of negative charge between the plugs of water.

Would the diamagnetism of the water flowing in a loop around a coil affect the charge clumps' ability to generate a signal in the coil?  Or would it make it stronger?

I forgot to mention I had to move the meter's red wire to the other socket to measure the Amps.

The next thing to do is put a small tube on the side of my cell, with a thin line around the middle and both the top and bottom of this tube piped back into the cell.  After enough water is poured into the cell to come up to the line on the gauge tube, a precise amount of water can be added to the cell, keeping track of how long it takes for the electrolysis to bring the water level back down to the reference line.  Then the gas output can be easily calculated.

I fired mine up again and took some readings.  With the cap on the secondary the meter shows 13.7 V.  Without the cap it's 19.8 V.  This is with the meter in parallel with the cell's wires.  Then I removed the cell's connection to the non diode side of the AC input (the wire which doesn't go directly to the transformer), and put the meter in series at this point, in series with the AC wire and the cell.  With the cap, it shows 2.8 Amps feeding the NST, through the meter and the cell.  Roughly 38 Watts.  Without the cap it reads 3.9 Amps, or right at twice the Watts.

I took a video, to get a clip of the bubbles right at startup, before the water gets too cloudy, but Windows 10 won't play the video from my Android phone.

I let it run for a little while and there is some small amount of condensation inside the neck of the plastic bottle, but none on the lid.  Bubbles breaking the surface may be spraying upwards.  The effect seems to work better with no cap in the secondary circuit, just the spark gap.  And the bubbles do blast when touched with a flame.

Good work, Steve.  I tried it with my 12kV NST and I'm also getting bubbles, a significant amount.  The cell is a couple of tapered restaurant sauce cups.  I have a 5/16" spark gap with a DIY nano Farad cap.  300 W on the primary, but, with the diode, it's perhaps only half the rated value.  edit: And I'm using well water.

With this many Watts, I'm wondering about steam?

According to the video at the start of this thread, we don't want the secondary to be invisible to the primary.  But does this mean we can't use my diode T-tap in the circuit, to pump the thermal electrons?

1 meyer didnt used the coils to restrict the amps they were there for create the voltage  intensification by collapse.. when a coil collapse unrestrictedly all the energy is dumped at once.

i started to learn how to use arduinos and esp´8266 and esp 32 chips ..

OK, thanks.  I'll try using a bifilar coil, with a spark gap at one end, one side of the gap connected back to the start, with the cell in series with the other input.

Arduinos are great.  I wired up a lot of PLC's when I was an industrial electrician.  It's so good that we can buy our own now.

One thing I'm having trouble with is the term 'voltage intensify'.  Stan said that when the outputs from the chokes are combined, the frequency doubles.  (Steve verified this on his scope.). Does this mean the voltage is intensified, just by adding more pulses?  I always thought intensify means increase, as if two pulses were stacked on top of each other.  Doubling the amplitude sharpens the leading edge.  Maybe there's another step which Stan left out on purpose, to pull the extra pulses back, to align them with the original pulses, while keeping the frequency the same?  Or is the intensifying simply caused by sending the pulses through an inductor, with the accompanying voltage increase?  Or would stacking the pulses produce Ed Gray's over/under waveform - a signal which rises and falls, while maintaining  a constant potential difference of at least 13.4 V?  (Shaking the static.)

There's an interval during which the step charging pulses to the cell are stopped, to allow the water molecules to 'relax', or self discharge, so they can be step charged again.  During this interval, the pulses are switched to the lightbulb which is part of the electron extraction circuit.  This keeps the cell from heating up, due to the "stretched rubber band" analogy Stan uses in the video.  Electrons which are pulled free are hot (according to Stan) and must be pulled out of the water, to keep the cell cool. He did this by switching the sharp inductive pulses to the light bulb , momentarily.

Stan's various patents show a variety of ways to do it, including unbroken pulse trains, even constantly increasing spacing between pulses.  The steep leading edge seems to be the consistent factor.  Semiconductors and relays can both produce square waves.  I have little confidence in semiconductors.  The kind of energy I like to use always frys them.  So I spent a lot of time watching relay videos.  But they just don't work for me.  I can build a simple inverter circuit, but as soon as I connect the transformer, the relay stops working.  No matter how big the relay or how small the transformer.  It just doesn't work for me.  No matter what I try, I can't see a way forwards.