Open letter to P. Lindemann
Started by unknown · · 59 posts · last reply 24 October 2011
-
#51 ·
Stan did not use UV light. The reason why he did not use UV light is because it would exceed the work function of the SS and create a photoelectric current inside the Hydrogen Gas Gun. UV light would pluck electrons off of the plates and send them into the gas cavity, which is exactly counter to amp restriction process that is required to ionize the combustible gas atoms.
That isn't UV???attachment_9903 attachment_9905 extracted from meyermemo.png meyer_light.jpg
-
#52 ·
Nitrous Oxide is discussed in the Exhaust Reclaimer Technology in the Tech Breif, it can be broken down and completely eliminated. It is not desired, and yet even without eliminating it, it is minimal as a byproduct anyway. Listen to him talk about it in his various lectures.
Sorry but you forget if you think that only hydrogen produced from WFC run an engine 100%. Nitrous oxide is formed from oxygen of water during the process and is, with ammonia, the other main component for reach right green fuel. Document attached is extracted from scientific analisys.Extract from scientific document.pdf
-
#53 ·
Everything I said was correct. You have some more learning to do.
Sorry .. in part is correct.. however explain chemically with formula what is your water fuel. If you know for you is simple write that.. My formula is 8N2+6HHO+Hv=4NH3+6N2O.. yours?? -
#54 · date not recorded
Stan did not use UV light. The reason why he did not use UV light is because it would exceed the work function of the SS and create a photoelectric current inside the Hydrogen Gas Gun. UV light would pluck electrons off of the plates and send them into the gas cavity, which is exactly counter to amp restriction process that is required to ionize the combustible gas atoms.
That isn't UV???
If you list all of Stan's technologies, UV light is not required for any of them. That is talking about recycling water AFTER it's been used. This is not required, it's just another approach instead of letting the water go out the exhaust pipe and then into the atmosphere, and through the cloud/rain cycle. If you use UV light anywhere else in the process you will screw it up by creating a photoelectric current. -
#55 · date not recorded
Nitrous Oxide is discussed in the Exhaust Reclaimer Technology in the Tech Breif, it can be broken down and completely eliminated. It is not desired, and yet even without eliminating it, it is minimal as a byproduct anyway. Listen to him talk about it in his various lectures.
Sorry but you forget if you think that only hydrogen produced from WFC run an engine 100%. Nitrous oxide is formed from oxygen of water during the process and is, with ammonia, the other main component for reach right green fuel. Document attached is extracted from scientific analisys.
That doc is not related to Stan's work, you are confusing different systems. Read the exhaust gas reclaimer technology in the Tech Brief, it will tell you how to completely eliminate Nitrous Oxide. -
#56 · date not recorded
Everything I said was correct. You have some more learning to do.
Sorry .. in part is correct.. however explain chemically with formula what is your water fuel. If you know for you is simple write that.. My formula is 8N2+6HHO+Hv=4NH3+6N2O.. yours??
It's not a chemical process, it's a physical process. I see you are not working on Stan's tech at all, you are doing something else. I wish you luck with that. I hope my comments here serve as a record to other researchers that they may distinguish between Stan's work and the other theories out there. I correct your statements in reference to Stan's technology only. -
#57 ·
Physical or chemical, does it really matter? We found here a big claim, and i don't think we should deny new theories.
I still think there is something else stan was talking about... in the end he clearly says that he can transform hydrogen into energy at 100% mass decay. But of course he worked thru many things in 30 years, i'm sure he might had used this system tut is talking about at maybe the initial time... later he was going to use the injectors only... -
#58 · date not recorded
100% Mass decay into energy would be E=mc^2 from Einstein. Stan supersedes this, as he mentions while teasing Einstein's theory for only being 3 dimensional in the New Zealand video. Mass energy is one thing and Stan's Universal Energy is another. You can find out more by reading the Universal Energy Balance of Water in the Tech Brief. -
#59 · date not recorded
100%? That doesn't sound right. Doesn't that mean something turns to nothing? Not to be a nag or anything, but, could you give me a better description? Why is it considered "decay"?
Sign in to reply, or ask for an account.