kinesisfilms

http://209.85.171.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.wasserauto.de/html/daniel_dingel.html&usg=ALkJrhjvbG8qmDCDK-M0PcdTA35AslJuGg#Autobild

i wish the german translated better in hte above links posted by fiditti....something about carbon based electrodes and simple elecctrolysis.....12 volts 5 amps....ignition coils.

that photo is from his recent device which makes electricity from water...apparently he would only have to connect the battery to get it started but once started it would run without the battery.

see you are judging bearden on this LOAN SINGLE document.....treat this document more so as a statement.....not a thesis.

bearden elaborates in his books.

he has written many books.

this document is him just saying hey today something was discovered that will revolutionize our future.

that is it. and nothing more.

this is not his life's work in 6 pdf pages.

so as for his proven statements....once again this is a short quick to the point pdf to give you a taste of what has been figured out.

as always. he will most likely write a book on this.

until then i suggest people understand the difference of short pdf's and concluded works.

bearden has enough written concluded work to give this short pdf credibility.....and that is my point.

i'll be glad if anyone informs me if he has a working zero-point energy device, as long as that is not the case i'm out.

actually he does.

listen to the tom talks tesla interview from 9:39 on.....he names people that he works with in his group and what they have invented.

your judging a person you don't know a thing about.

im not sure what's more flawed...his quantum equation or your assumptions.

if your going to quote me quote me correctly......much not physics related stuff......oh yeah i don't remember saying that......the quote button is used for just that...quote someone.

credentials and a resume make just that.....a person credible.

who are you again.....oh yeah that's right username haithar........who is what?......a person on a forum......hmmm who should i believe??

Tom Bearden with his Master of Science degree in Nuclear Engineering and  Bachelor of Science in Mathematic...wait what was that again...oh yeah MATHEMATICS........

oh but i forgot how much you knew about Mathematical Theories.

Einstein said that there was no energy in the vacuum...no mass no energy simple as that where Max Planck said that there was unlimited energy at the Zero-point node.......these two argued it out until einstein began to realize that max was correct and that in Quantum physics we see that Light is something unusual that pulls energy from somewhere else.....IE other dimensions....Light is not a particle nor is it a wave!....it can act as both but light is LIGHT......therefore as you aproach zero point where no temperature and no mass occur there can be UNLIMITED Energy since we do not understand light and it's unknown variables.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

this is by far above any of our heads.

and as far as i see it.

I would trust someone who works in Quantum Physics and with Associates of the Field.

over a faceless internet forum user.

space-time= dont even try to talk like you udnerstand space time in mathematical concepts HAITHAR.

LOOK AT ANY OF BEARDENS ASSOCIATES......a good 80% of them work in the Quantum Physics field.

the fact alone that he attests John Kanzius a Dr. title makes the whole pdf dubious and untrustworthy.

lol

and for anyone who is questioning tom bearden's authenticity.....

He was a nuclear engineer, wargames analyst, and military tactician, Lieutenant Colonel (retired) Tom bearden has over 26 years experience in air defense systems, tactics and operations; technical intelligence, antiradiation missile countermeasures; nuclear weapons employment, computerized wargames; and military systems requirements.

Tom Bearden obtained a Master of Science degree in nuclear engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics from Northeast Louisiana University.  He is also a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College and several U.S. Army artillery and missile schools.

This is the foreword of a research book and is written by John T. Ratzlaff.


so even if bearden gave a person the title Dr........he himself is far more credible then your one superimposed statement.

lol

Hey tad , like Stevie i am also wondering how you calculate the capacitance of a tap water capacitor... I also had it measured but it was 0 capacitance.... a leaking capacitor... how exactly did you calculate yours ?

Also i am wondering why you chose 48khz

Also , i was wondering if you could post a basic picture of your connection or photo or your setup ... maybe take a picture that doesnt reveal much but gives us an idea

if you have a multimeter you can measure it's capacitance......easy as that.

you know if we make a ton of vic coils and sell them via word of mouth or even ebay we could as a group collect the stanley meyer's collection ourselves.

it means that when the 50% duty cycle on pulse charges up the inductor and then on the off pulse the inductor releases an exact equal pulse.....hence unipolar double pulses.

even 2curiouswfc didn't ahve a good double pulse.....these double pulses are 1kv with a 5 volt amplitude input.

dankie i drew it out for you before NO I AM NOT USING JUST MY FUNCTION GENERATOR!

LISTEN AND READ.

damnit.....it doesn't matter what i write you completely don't even read it.

do you know anything about electronics?

look at my new topic called variable voltage amplitude control.

i drew it out of exactly what is going on and what im doing......i even provided the wave forms at each point AND I HAVE EXACTLY WHAT IT SHOWS IN THE PATENT AT EACH STEP.

holy shit.

dankie it is not....it is completely seperate......6-1 is not variable voltage control i can show you with my scope what happens if you put a normal 50 percent duty square wave into it without the correct proportion of amplitude to power.

and the only diode i am using is the one on john's cil...aka the ONLY DIODE IN THE VIC CIRCUIT.

The shaded coil is SS the not shaded is regular copper.  Or vice versa if you want.  One is copper and the other is SS,  That is for the internal windings ie chokes, the primary and seconday are both copper.

no where is this stated in the tech brief for figure 10-4 that the shaded is ss and teh white is copper.......and also it says to water gap....not to resonant charging chokes if that was the case....seeing that it does say to water gap proves this is the resonant charging chokes....and not the bifilar secondary configuration.

now figure 8-10 is a bifilar secondary.....but i rather not go there.......i am trying to understand the basics before adding more coils to the coils i already do not understand.

The copper wire of 10-4 seems to be secondary bifilar wrapped as in 8-10.

what copper wire.....figure 10-4 says stainless steel.

burntwire:

wind slowly......and in all honesty wind by hand if your machine is not delicate enough.....i wound a 7.8kohm bifilar coil by hand and it was fine.....you may even wind it all the way with a machine with out any breaks only to find out that somehow the enamel was scraped and you nowe have a short.

FUN FUN FUN.

now about soldering it......that is completely up to you......im not sure of it's effects but you would have insulate that solder droplet.....but depending on the strength of the magnetic field produced by the coil i am not sure if the solder drop would TRULY screw things up.....i just always rewind rather then using bubble gum and bandades to fix things.

geet does use steel but it is the PLASMA that breaks down the chemistry in the fuel not the steel itself.....so technically it is not geet.

this clearly says the windings are OPPOSED....

"Let us imagine the flow through the "choke"...
Since the B-flow flows in one direction...when it interacts in the
choke, it flowing in one direction on the + side...and in the opposite
direction on the - side. The B-Flow is quite simplified in that
drawing, it actually corkscrews around the wire while spinning. These
two spinning corkscrews of flux meet in the bifilar coil on the iron
core...this concentrates both fluxes into the core and essentially
cancels the B-Flow...which then resists the flow of amperage.
The voltage potentials are still there pulling on them."

exactly as demartin has said and exactly as i have seen.

you can't even comprehend the things you read.

put your self on a list of total confusion......oh yeah and i forgot how dynodon, 2curiouswfc, gotoluc, and gmeast were on a list......ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING.

i am well aware of Vrms and Irms...but sqaure waves are different in there sustained peak then ac waves are.

if i were to use ac power and rectify it to produce DC unfiltered power then i would consider Vrms and Irms.

but square waves are much much different.....and the tiny tiny tiny off pulse between the well created unipolar pulses may either hold some relevant information or too tiny to consider.

it is still unknown but it is good you bring this up.

fedex shipping location is closed on monday.....strange....so i have to wait for tomorrow.

i understand now.....thank you very much!

alright so to get a conversion of 12 volts 3.3 amps (40 watts) to 40,000 volts at .001 amps (40watts) we need a Z = 12,000....with R= 11,600 ohms then XL-XC= 3,073 ohms.

given information in the tech brief states that a tube size of 3 inches in height with .75 outer diameter .5 inner diameter .0625 wall thickness has a resonant frequency with the vic of around 5,000 hz. (he later also calls this resonant pulse)

so with the tube specifications and the dialetric constant of water equaling 78.54 ohms we get 9.4583E-11 farads

now here is where i am confused.....this wording is very tricky here
(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/perhertz.jpg)

what does this 2,500 discrete pulses in a 50% duty cycle per hz mean.......it isn't just a difficult way of saying 2.5khz is it?......the 50% duty cycle per hz throws me off.

electrojolt...if you happen to read this what is your take on this?