Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Chris Bake

12 posts · 9 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Dec 2022 and Jun 2023

An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Stanley Meyer demystified

#6 ·

Expanding on the importance of self/mutual inductance and how to manipulate it.

Making self/mutual-inductance work in phase with applied primary current, accelerating the change in work, and compressing the time scale, amplifying total power delivered (step-up transformer)

Take for instance again the attached simple circuit. I have no video at the moment, but, if you build it, you will see. Without the diode from the LV+ to HV lead, you will see both electrodes light up, with the bottom neon electrode being brighter. If you add the diode string, you will see only the bottom electrode light up MUCH brighter.

Without the diodes, the forward current of the primary, through mutual-induction creates a reversed flow in the secondary, and the the HV lead is HV- on forward induction and the top neon terminal lights up (current flows from + towards -, the HV- lights up because Voltage flows - towards + ), then the current stops flowing, and the magnetic field collapses much faster than the forward field grew, ("flyback always collapses faster), this collapse reverses the voltages, and the change in work happening over a shorter time increases voltage (Delta Work/Delta Time) making the bottom neon electrode glow brighter.

Now adding the diode...
Normally, as the primary current flows, the mutual-induced current in the secondary opposes the current flow in the primary and creates an opposing reversed magnetic field that fights the magnetic field being created in the primary, by adding the diode string with negative polarity facing the HV lead....this reversed mutual-induced HV- current shorts out through the diodes, as such the opposing induced current in the secondary is allowed to flow out of the secondary, this also removes the opposing induced magnetic field in the Flux core. So this first step, neutralizes the opposition of mutual-inductance.
At the exact same time, the rerouting of this current out of the inductor of the secondary, creates its own reversed self/mutual inductance in opposition to itself, into the secondary, along with a magnetic field also opposed to itself, this self/mutual inductance of a self/mutual induced current is now IN PHASE WITH the primary current/magnetic field (opposite of an opposition), and pulls the primary magnetic field into the core faster, and in turn, pulls the current in faster, which in turns increases the induced current/field speed, etc, etc....in essence, it creates a positve feedback loop, exponentially accelerating the speed which current/voltage is distrubuted across both primary and secondary coils (both coils are energized).
Once the capacitor/pulse is empty/off, the voltage across the primary reverses (see RLC circuits) matching secondary polarity (there is also a possibility the primary current(s) are pulled into the feedback loop as the HV- potential rises, as they would be HV+ biased regardless of their LV bias).
The diode shuts off, and the magnetic field starts to collapse, being as there is no opposed current/field in the coils, or in the iron core, the "Flyback" occurs faster than normal, and the voltage flips and increases many factors higher, and all power is sent forward across neon/gap. None of the power was lost (besides losses due to resitance), and it was in fact, amplified beyond initial input. Aetheric inpouring was allowed to occur by destabilizing/reorienting self/mutual-inductions that would normally balance/oppose forward applied current and magnetic field propagation/collapse. (I suspect self/mutual-induced counter currents/EM fields arise from aetheric polarization)

Reminds me of another circuit. Diodes help to prevent reversal, and support redirection. Harvesting backEMF nets another step.  But, there's always a headroom ceiling you can attenuate within. 

Back to Basics

#55 ·

i got something nice for you all....

Watch this video, please

Sextuple AND gating via H11D1 (in the style of bedini 4wave)

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vXpCsLjlgE[/youtube]

Gate frequency is a tone as well. We are playing musical chords to the cell.

Heterodyning: Inputting 2 frequencies and manifesting 2 more. One at their Sum and one at their Difference. (3 + 9 = 6 + 12)

Just saving everyone's time and frustration.

Andrija Puharich talks about resonance to be the most current with the less power applied, Meyer talks the opposite with almost same circuit (inductors and transformer) with exception of the diode.

Everyone who think by their own head will question all of this.
with serie resonance, thats what it is. Current and also voltage. out of phase......The voltage creates the "pressure" and then the current can boost in. That how you get lots of current going thru a wfc...

now the question is: how high can you go with voltage to charge up a bifilar coil? What are the upper borders?
Of course it depends on the amount of windings and wire resistance, but still...
Lets say, we take a ferriet core with 400 bif windings...
How high can you go with volts?


As high as the components will allow. That WFC capacitive-resistor has a voltage threshold relative to the gap spacing and the water impurities.  The chokes and diode do too. All components have to support the working threshold desired.

 
Actually, Bob used 6 frequencies. Each of the 3 channels, had a Gated Pulse waveform. And, if you've ever listened to your electricity, you'll hear both tones being reproduced and can tune to combinations that produce musical chords.  :)

Then, of course, the shared toroid and LC tank were subject to hetero-dyning as well. Exponential harmonics are created from that effect. I built a 4 channel version, similar to Bedini/Rife 4wave mixer. Ironically, it's the same exact process of modulation.

What's the difference between Gating and Amplitude Modulation?  1 picoVolt :)

Stan's use of gradient voltage bursts, effecting Resonant Action in the spherical cavity, were also a form of tonal modulation. Leo Fender did it in 1970  with the infamous Bias Wiggle :)

Solid State Version:
Vacuum Tube Version:

Listen to your voltage

Back to Basics

#57 · date not recorded

Very cool sounding… I did some music connecting the pll circuit to a speaker too… sounded a bit different very playable!!!

You sound like chorus effect on guitar may mean your frequencies are not sync…

Yea, that's correct. Analog and antique signal generators have drift, due to aging capacitors in the timer and power supply circuits. Some fine adjustment is necessary to get them to sync.
Or perhaps, there is another benefit? That stereo/tremolo effect is wave coherence and the trading of dominance in the mix. ;)

Wave differential creates torque. Actual physical wave energy collisions occurring.

Back to Basics

#50 · date not recorded

Not to mention, dual-crossover sequenced switching that employs negative and positive elongation independently for width and spacing, and an independent offset control.

Or, how Stan simulated a biased AC wave using sequenced and random alternations swapping the B+ offtime reference during gate periods.

Back to Basics

#49 · date not recorded

Yes, I agree. Duty Cycle Pulses were Stan's method of controlling this sustained polarization and bursting amplitudes.

Also, most people never realize the great inhibition on tuning pulses and core saturation, that a percentage based duty cycle adjustment causes. All your signal generators are flawed, making it nearly impossible to tune replications of Stan's circuits due to all the differences in the VIC Matrix caused by parasitics and ideal vs real component behaviors.

Only having independent width and spacing control circumvents this flaw. I'm writing an article on my research on this subject that I will share sometime soon. :)

What you mean? With flawed signal generators? What would make it impossible to tune? To have mark space is not hard… even the pll can be made to have variable duty cycle… the fracture cell also Is some very good for the abilities

When you increase frequency (to get more pulse count), you indirectly decrease BOTH the width (ontime) and the spacing (offtime) equally.
When you adjust duty cycle % (to get more on-time) you indirectly decrease the spacing (off-time)
When you increase gate frequency to reduce pulse count, you indirectly reduce T3A (and T4A) making the gate period shorter.

Compounded by the AND gate logic required, every adjustment you make results in a tradeoff of "parameters" for the rest of the pulse, train, and gate.

What if you wanted to reduce spacing, but keep the same width? (PWM is current flow, which is directly related to managing core saturation per pulse/train)

What if you weren't bound to such shackles?

[youtube]https://youtu.be/me39I__5WjM[/youtube]

Back to Basics

#37 · date not recorded

Yes, I agree. Duty Cycle Pulses were Stan's method of controlling this sustained polarization and bursting amplitudes.

Also, most people never realize the great inhibition on tuning pulses and core saturation, that a percentage based duty cycle adjustment causes. All your signal generators are flawed, making it nearly impossible to tune replications of Stan's circuits due to all the differences in the VIC Matrix caused by parasitics and ideal vs real component behaviors.

Only having independent width and spacing control circumvents this flaw. I'm writing an article on my research on this subject that I will share sometime soon. :)

Back to Basics

#34 · date not recorded

Amperage is absolute minimum with such short periods. <200mA max, but as low as 5-10mA in certain cases which are inversely proportionate with gate offtime.