WaytoGo

@Dynodon


I bet it would be popular if you made a video of the demo tube cell, with the alternator setup, and showed us how much gas it produces at maximum.. 

Master Steve is a true genius! i know...sad that you forgot the circuit.... give you self some relaxing holydays and it may come back to you!   

An alternator produces a sine wave .

A sine wave is much smoother than pulsed dc , on the scope I can see that this rhytmic motion will do better than pulsed dc . It just makes sense that it would .

I have a 300W pure sine wave inverter and with the right plate spacing the gas output is extreme.
Have read that inverters can today have a efficiency up to 95% comparing the input and output.. but the energy in the HHO gas produced is at the moment unknown for me... Didn't Master Steve use a inverter for that motorbike idling?...Hmmm   

Nice find Stevie!

..The GAS passes a UV lamp and becomes electrically charged.. (ionized) positive charged?..
 
Air Ionizer uses somtimes a UV lamp : http://www.heavenfresh.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/104

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_ioniser

This one looks a bit like stanley meyers air gas prosessor    : http://images.google.no/imgres?imgurl=http://www.heavenfresh.com/catalog/images/Ionic_Air_Purifier_XJ-201.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.heavenfresh.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/31&usg=__SQ1Ebfh24qPeVvKL3NmRS6fNnsg=&h=300&w=300&sz=10&hl=no&start=15&um=1&tbnid=F3U7e4eMDuykbM:&tbnh=116&tbnw=116&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dair%2Bionizer%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dno%26rlz%3D1T4GGLJ_noNO267NO267%26sa%3DN

Water ionizer :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_ionizer

http://images.google.no/imgres?imgurl=http://hiddencures.com/pics/SmallIonizerPic.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.hiddencures.com/&usg=__r_pIRUWCFq07YDR6ldM5xcIsRE0=&h=771&w=673&sz=26&hl=no&start=1&um=1&tbnid=LwBPzGkoqT2h2M:&tbnh=142&tbnw=124&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dwater%2Bionizer%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dno%26rlz%3D1T4GGLJ_noNO267NO267%26sa%3DN

Is it the negative or positive ionizing Stan used?..

Best regards

I have used 5 volts ultra violet diodes direct in a hydrogen cell without any noticeable changes in gas production.

It only looks nicer, but i did not give any effect.. and F.... i bought 50 pcs. of them.. 

But i did not pulse the diodes.. maybe i should if someone can learn me to make a pulse circuit for the diodes?

Goey
 
Steam.... It was not steam...lol.. and yes, it was AC, but i had to have a adjust the plate gap ( bigger gap than with DC ) so the overload protection in the inverter didn't start to beep and shut itself down. AC can indeed make HHO.
 
I am thinking of getting me a 1000W inverter... really blow the water out of the bucket

Just an idea that came to me..

Wonder what happen if a copper tube spiral ( work like a radiator ) was made outside on that hot spot for collecting that heat energy to a HHO cell in a circulating system, for lower amp and higher gas output, and then let the HHO gas produced be added to the Geet intake.. 

(Too hot with 400 degr, celcius for a hho cell, but you can just make the tube longer after the spiral so it water get cooler or let it cross that cool spot..80-50 degr. will give high output hho at great effency.)


1. Maybe heat collecting will mess up the function of the geet..i dont know..   

2. Maybe dangerous if you get backfireing.. so be careful if you try this.

According to DanielDingel.com there is no patent :  http://danieldingel.com/node/15

But this page is explaining some of the patent : http://www.jcmiras.net/jcm/item/75/

Dingle mentioned vacuum : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMXz6XEXKns&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdanieldingel%2Ecom%2Fwatercar&feature=player_embedded

 

I believed the ceramic alumina material was absorbing all the heat from the flashback flame so it died before it reached the cell.

I have been thinking about the same, but i will use a 1984 Volvo 240 with automatic transmission, a 2,1 Liter engine, carburetor.. i have replaced the points and condenser with "Hot spark" petronix electronic iginition module, Halo spark plugs,  and racing washable airfilter that replaces the original filter with higher airflow.... that has given the engine a new life!!! , much quicker respond, more power and saves gas already...

Next level will be to install a highvolt cell for testing.

Stanleys dune buggy was a rail buggy.

This one looks pretty close :  http://www.berrienbuggy.com/id35.htm

"Hydrogen Warrior"

You can buy a kit and finish it yourself... if you want make a exact copy you can probably find new wheels that look the same today. A lot of work, but a man needs a hobby..

Wish a kit for Christmas...

I think Stan had a powerful connection with angels... so his great ideas may be from a divine source.

@Dynodon

Ok.. thank you for the answer. Stan could had used the alternator/redi-line generator as we today use a effective power inverter. You can drive a small car engine on HHO until the batteries is powerless. There is a big room for the batteryes in front of that buggy..

I am now working on my big cell, four gallon (ca.15 liter) water with 12 tubes 18 inches tall and will publish test data if it does perform well.

@electrojolt

Stan could had fooled himself... and then us...

Yes, he did... it must be a cup of petrol since they are waiting for the petrol to be used up.... and then "IT RUNS ON WATER!!!!!!!"

Wonder why the wfc didn't explode?.. he never used a bubbler, and this was before the "quenching circuit"?...Maybe he used one of these : http://www.ottofrei.com/store/product.php?productid=7290

 There was a pressure in cell over 13 psi even when the buggy motor was using the gas it needed... an other interesting thing is that the rpm of that motor is so high that he could perfectly drive only on the demo cell...........

That tells me it was a very efficient prosess he had discovered!

There is a thing i find extra funny... that is his friend you see in this video, is the same guy who is sitting back on top of the buggy in the news video, controlling the gas from the wfc to the carb, with a simple ballvalve!!!!!!!!!!! They could easy had made it pedal controlled mecanically or electrical controlled valve so his friend could had sit beside him when he was driving if they wanted!!!...

Hi,



I believe in low amp and are working on it now whatever the patents says.

There is endless many  things we can try...... so keep it up


Best regards

Okay, Alan you have a good point, but if the electrons was taken out of the water and not the wfc... was a separate water container used for this purpose?..

The electrons were taken out of h2o but not extracted from the wfc

Anyway i tested a cell with PDC and a LED as a "amp consuming device".. only five or six volts.. i am glad i did, cell was completely steady with no amp climbing on the multimeter. ( when i took off the LED the amp where climbing slow up.
Have also tyred AC and it is making extremely amounts of Hydrogen/ Oxygen from ca 180 Volt and up, but water is getting hot after a while and that is not what Stanley did..
So AC or DC or PDC is making more or less heat if you make a lot of gas in straight clean tapwater whatever you do.
But i found an "scientific article" sometime ago and wrote something important down : "Much heat is released when hydrogene and oxygen recombine to form water."
Aha, so this is where the heat is coming from..I believed it was coming from the amps.. How did Stan keep the gasses apart in the wfc so he could build up the pressure and keep it "cold"?.. Even if he used no amps, he must have had solved the problem with recombining. Do LED`s solve this problem? can`t see any LED in his demo cell. I have tested with LED`s but that was for making more gas and i didn't see any improvement, but LED`s used to hold the gasses apart have i not tested yet. But i have found out that LED`s working on AC with up to double voltage...the light is pulsing a bit if you look close...don`t know how long they will last on AC.

The closest to no voltage loss in a cell is with AC so far.
 

Yes, this is a big question.

I heard Stan says in a video the wfc operates on 0 - 2000 Volts,

I have also read that you need at least 1500 Volts to start the molecular ringing.

Kilovolt and milliamp pulses with twenty thousand cycles across the excitors is said to shake the molecules apart.

The alternator could have been used as a "hertz machine" and combined with a pulse circuit  it may reach 20.000 Hz

He says he is doing the exactly opposite of the electrolysis prosess.

Maybe he was taking OUT electrones so the water molecule collapsed?..

http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/8/8.02T/f04/visualizations/electrostatics/30-vdgdischarge/30-vdgdischarge320.html

What a cool animation, Dankie! Thanks..

Kind regards

you ever wounder why Stan says you need more heneries then capacitance?..  answer anyone?

Henry's is the unit symbol of inductance, You have one henry when  you use one amp per sec. and get one volt.

Capacitance is the ability for a capacitor to hold a electrical charge  .. for example in the WFC..

So i guess Stan meant you need more volt in the inductors than electrical charge in the tube cell.. for charging the tube cell is a dead short condition, and you can`t bring voltage up in a dead short condition he said.. .

Stanley Meyer are just smiling in videos and pictures knowing that this time no one can take the idea from him..
Nobody took his ideas from him, for they couldn't understand what he did, but sadly his life was somehow taken from him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUaEnxLEdfI&feature=channel_page

He used volt for splitting water... Potential energy.... But we cant restrict the amps and at the same time have energy to use?... or can we?  for example if i am welding some steel parts together and connect the ground cable for my MIG welding apparatus to a wooden table with the parts i am welding on... no ground...but that dosent mean i can weld for free for ever does it?... NO i cant... no amp! and no HEAT... Hello i said NO AMP = NO HEAT

Stanleys WFC was COLD and he claimes close to NO AMP.... HE DID NOT USE AMPS (or current)

What did he do?.. WHAT DID HE DO?..  hmm the opposite of electrolysis......

Maybe the answer will come if we wish on a star :  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGeIc7EzJNo

Meyer was very good, no doubt about it . But we can do this again i am sure.

We know Meyers cell was cold to the touch so maybe

we should aim for a cold process now, all i have personally done so far is pretty much a hot prosess and that is just electrolysis and notting worth chare.

If you have a cold process then you are on the first Meyer level i guess..