Stepping in.
#10 ·
What are you talking about?
12 posts · writing between Feb 2023 and Sep 2024
An identity on IonizationX as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.
#10 ·
Well, as I stated in the other post, the voltage in the cell is directly proportional to the current passing thru it. No matter how many turns your bifilar has, if it does not have the capability to feed many amps to your cell, you wont have high voltages at your cell, unless the resistance of your cell is huge (with the cell beign small). My cell has 100 Ohms resistance, I need 10 amps peak to have 1kV in it. In my case, if I had 1000t bifilar with awg35 wire, I would never reach kV in my cell, I can achieve with kV with 200t, awg23, but is pure electrolysis. If 100V is applied to a 100Ohm load, you'll always have 1amp, you'll never get to restrict the current without lowering the voltage, this is ohms law. You cannot apply 100V to a 100ohms load and have only miliamps, and it does not have anything to do with the frequency, you can sweep you cell from DC to 1Ghz, the frequency response is flat.
#8 · date not recorded
#53 · date not recorded
#52 · date not recorded
His demo cell (Lawton replication) was resonant and arguably non-faradic...but how the hell could he supply water vapor and ozone directly to a spark plug voltage zone (his very last version) and have a singular dissociation and then explosive event at the end, and it have any of the stuff claimed to be going on in the Lawton replication happen?
Hmm, I wonder what he meant by Voltage "Intensifier" Circuit...or the comment "current is not delivered or made to flow....in the standard way"?
#48 · date not recorded
#36 · date not recorded
you also will have zero volts across the water in that way
#25 · date not recorded
If you have low current at the cell, the voltage at the cell will be Current (I) x Cell resistance (R).
For an 100Ohms cell, you need 1 amp to give you 100V.
Someone need to demonstrate how to violate ohms law first to assure that he had high voltage at the cell.
It is impossible to reach kV ratings in an 80Ohms cell using miliamps... And there is no phase shift between current and voltage at the cell...
You are thinking correctly.
Watch Ravi's channel where he shows the white coating on the pipes. This plaque, or rather its resistance, increases the voltage at low current.
There are about 5 methods to reduce the current to 0.001 ampere, but they must be used all together and synchronize their work with each other
You are right, I already saw that at Ravi's channel, but all of Stans tubes have no white coating on it, so he must be using another technique...
Another point is that we cant use anything between the tubes and the water as insulator. A capacitor polarization occurs at the dieletric. Our aim here is to have displacement charges at the water, which should be our "dielectric". Anything in between will be charged instead of charging the water.
#13 · date not recorded
If you have low current at the cell, the voltage at the cell will be Current (I) x Cell resistance (R).
For an 100Ohms cell, you need 1 amp to give you 100V.
Someone need to demonstrate how to violate ohms law first to assure that he had high voltage at the cell.
It is impossible to reach kV ratings in an 80Ohms cell using miliamps... And there is no phase shift between current and voltage at the cell...
#4 · date not recorded
#4 · date not recorded
Hello every one.
Many years, i am running this forum, but there are not so many people are interested in the topics here.
Shall i close the forum, or shall i keep it open?
Regards
Steve