Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

fait accomli

Started by Duncan · · 15 posts · last reply 18 September 2010

  1. Duncan

    #1 ·

  2. lamare

    #2 ·

    What I have done is analyse three systems of which at least two have been publicly shown to work and explain the working principles behind these in all detail:



    So, now everyone that wants to can read how to do this, in principle. And since it's all out there in the open, there is no way anyone can put this genie back in the bottle.... And this is also the way to avoid having an "accident", cause then the information would still be out in the public, and such an event would only make people more curious, which would only make things worse for those that like this information to stay under ground.

    And of course, I have made sure I have some insurance policies:


  3. Michael John Nunnerley

    #3 ·

    HI Duncan and welcome.

    This is as difficult if not more so than inventing the machine in the first place, let me explain as it was explained to me.

    If you have a machine that would replace petrolium or natural gas or coal or any other fossil fuel used today, you need first to answer these few questions:-

    a, Is it cheap or expensive to make

    b, Can it be made by any handy person at home

    c, Could it be taxed in some way so as to offset the loss of income to the governments by not selling fossil fuel products, including job taxes, NI etc.

    d, How many jobs would be LOST by the introduction of this machine, and if millions and millions, what would the people who lost their jobs think of you.

    The last question is the hard one and the most difficult to create a solution.

    For sure the climate we breath would be for the better and the world we live on, but would we really be any better off with millions and millions of more people out of work in the first years of FREE energy. Just think of the knock on effect of the job losses, I think I under estimated, not millions but billions, a domino effect.

    Now don't get me wrong, I work creating these types of energy "none fossil fuel" energy, some free and others cost a little.

    In time we are going to need these machines creating this energy, but, it will have to be introduced a little by little so as the world ecconomy can adjust and not create a ten fold world ecconomic problem as we have right now with the banking sector fat cats wanting to get fatter.

    If you answer those few questions I put first then you will see why governments will do ANYTHING to stop a free or cheap energy machine from getting into the market place in any volume.

    My answer is don't rock the boat so it sinks, control it, use it yourself and familly and friends, make life a little more comfortable, but don't get yourself killed.

    Mike
  4. SkyWatcher

    #4 ·

    Hi folks, Hi Duncan, first thing one must ask themselves is why does one need so called money. Look at all the aspects in ones life that seems to require this ink paper and if one researches thoroughly, one will find that in almost all cases of basic needs, it is a contrived, engineered false reality meant to give control and power to a few. Now what does this have to do with an energy device, everything. Unlimited excess energy devices in the hands of all humanity would negate a large aspect of the control structures set in place. Lets look at energy and how it plays a role in us getting our food as well. If all farmers wanted to share their food freely with all humanity, of course keeping what they need for their family, how could this be possible. It is possible for farmers to share most all their crop with humanity, when societal structures are setup to enable it. I wont go into the long list of issues that prevent a farmer from sharing almost all their crops freely and anyone for that matter sharing freely their time and energy, however a short basic list is all that is needed to make an example.
    PAYING FOR THE DIRT WE LIVE ON IN ANY WAY WHAT SO EVER, NOBODY WOULD PAY RENT IF THEY HAD THEIR OWN DIRT TO USE.

    PAYING FOR FOOD WHEN IT IS FREELY GROWN BY MOTHER EARTH, FARMERS WOULD LIKELY SHARE ALL THEY COULD IF ENERGY DEVICES WERE NOT SUPPRESSED AND THEN IT WOULD BE ONLY AN ISSUE OF THEIR TIME AND ENERGY. THOUGH I SEE SMALL HYDROPONIC AND SMALL GREEN HOUSES COMMUNITIES TAKING OFF.

    THE FIAT INK PAPER AND ANY INTERMEDIARY TOOLS OF EXCHANGE BETWEEN HUMANS ALWAYS PRESENT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHERS TO PLUNDER THE ABUNDANCE MEANT FOR HUMANITY, AS HAS BEEN OCCURRING FOR SOMETIME.
    That should be fairly simple to understand, and in reality, the seeming lack in this world is not complicated to understand why it is occurring. At the most basic level, it stems from a third party called an exchange tool , or money, or in the case now, very worthless and easily manipulated fiat currency. With this knowledge, it seems fairly obvious why a small group of people who actually have very little power, would want to prevent unlimited excess energy devices from flourishing, it puts a big hole in their illusionary dam of control. We the people have the true power and once enough of us wake up to this fact, the game of limitation is over. In fact it is ending sooner than most think.
    peace love light
    Tyson
  5. Duncan

    #5 ·

    Lamare thanks for that info very interesting. And Michael your comments are indeed very erudite! Should free energy suddenly become available even as a widespread demonstrable and provable high powered example, it would indeed rock and crack the very foundation of society as we know it.
    That is why I presume so many pioneers and inventers have been culled! Here is a radio Interview concerning one of my favorite inventers Stan Mayer YouTube - Opie & Anthony: Stan Meyer's Water Car
  6. lamare

    #6 ·

    @Duncan:

    You are right on many things. You may enjoy my "food for thought" thread:


    Einstein was wrong, his relativity theory is crap. And "they" definately know it. The Germans already had flying saucers during WW-II:
    DISC AIRCRAFT OF THE THIRD REICH (1922-1945 and BEYOND)
    HAUNEBU

    It ain't for nothing that they got all these Nazi scientists to the US. And they continued working on those:



    Reich of The Black Sun - Nazi Secret Weapons and The Cold War Allied Legend

    UFO How-To: Build UFO antigravity electrogravitic saucer

    Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Patents/UfoHowto/


    IMHO, the only way to change this is to cooperate and work together as open source engineers. And the most important things to figure out are the principles along which we can design working FE machines. I think I am pretty close to understanding not only Gray, but also the WFC by Meyer and Puharich. There are some more pieces of this WFC puzzle, but I'm sure I am close to the answer now:
  7. Farmhand

    #7 ·

    Awesome lamare, the Otis T. Carr interviews are in your how to build a flying saucer link.

    ta.
  8. Michael John Nunnerley

    #8 ·

    Hi Duncan

    Yes we have to use slight of hand as you might say. I have documented all my work and registered it with Notaries, not just one, and that gives me a little edge over the powers that be. I am attacked nearly on a daily basis in one form or the other and have now got quite used to it, but still upsets me and frustrates me.

    I have a paper pending for anouncement of generation of a nitrogen based carrier fuel which is very cheap to make, but it also could be used for explosive production or fertilisers, "the two extreams" you might say! Up to now this would need a great amount of energy and the use of hydrocarbons such as natural gas or petrolium for their hydrogen content, this now is not needed.

    It has been pointed out to me that it will be blocked on the explosives production as a problem of security, what would they do to me? well use the anti terrorist laws, take me into custody with no questions asked court order and disapear without trial. As I have said before, putting this tech: out there is more of a problem than inventing it in the first place.

    If you have any ideas please let me know, I will publicise in the very near future, but without construction detail.

    Mike
  9. lamare

    #9 ·

    Farmhand wrote:

    Awesome lamare, the Otis T. Carr interviews are in your how to build a flying saucer link.

    ta.
    I have done a little patent search, based on the patents in the "basic" ufo howto book. Uploaded them here: Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/Patents/UfoHowto/

    More at: Index of /patents

    Compare this patent

    with this picture of a now *identified* flying object:



    The balls below the craft are described in the patent as being capacitors....
  10. Duncan

    #10 ·

  11. lamare

    #11 ·

    It doesn't have to deliver kWs. What you need is a simple system that can be constructed for very little money that proofs a principle, something like this:



    Haven't had the time to try this yet, but as far as I can tell this should work in principle. There may be some dirty details I haven't thought of, but I think this should work, in principle. The only question is how many transformers you need to drive from how many, because you need to match the resonances such that the load you drive is in half-wave resonance.. I think you'd have to drive two in series, cause the driving transformer is in quarter wave resonance....

    As for keeping yourself alive, do as John Perkins did:


    .
    In other words: make sure that what you publish is such that it is that threathening to "them" to draw attention to it that they have no choice but to leave you alone!

    And that means: full publishing of all the secrets and all the dirty details, IMHO. So far, this has worked for me. Never heard or seen an MIB...
  12. Duncan

    #12 ·

  13. lamare

    #13 ·

    Good point. You need a system that can easily and cheaply be scaled up. The problem with Bedini's stuff is that he, as far as I can tell, gets his energy because he creates a non permanent electret (polarized dielectric) inside his batteries/caps, which can charge them, but only with a small current, which is comparable to a leakage current, only it goes the other way around. So, IMHO, this does not scale up easily and that's why "they" let him.
  14. Duncan

    #14 ·

  15. sucahyo

    #15 ·

    lamare wrote:



    Haven't had the time to try this yet, but as far as I can tell this should work in principle. There may be some dirty details I haven't thought of, but I think this should work, in principle. The only question is how many transformers you need to drive from how many, because you need to match the resonances such that the load you drive is in half-wave resonance.. I think you'd have to drive two in series, cause the driving transformer is in quarter wave resonance....
    I would prefer connecting the first transformer secondary to battery positive instead of battery negative. not for OU reason but for health reason.

Sign in to reply, or ask for an account.