Ronnie Walker (aka gpssonar) Replication
Started by unknown · · 55 posts · last reply 5 May 2016
-
#26 ·
I really dont believe that cell behaves like a real capacitor. It takes on charge but not the way we all think.
Resonance can be at the coils with self capacitance, it magnifies a lot the voltage the same time it restricts the amps.
What everyone think about "flux cancellation" behavior?
I have a different view of some people who said that flux cancellation restricts amps, it seems to be clear that it is opposit behavior. -
#27 ·
Now my problem is lack of the right tools:
My Hitachi v212 scope is not the best, but the only one i can afford, differential probes cost a lot , so i will try to build a differential input with op-amps and buy a simple hv probe thaat is cheaper. -
#28 · date not recorded
i think the water behaves as a dielectric at a certain frequency,,, meaning it allows the coil to overcharge the molecules with electrostatic potential...
your osciloscope is analog... may not be bad.. but a digital one is very good option as it is a multimeter inside with multiple functions.. .
diferential probe without proper shield is unreliable.. i wouldnt lose time on it.. try to get the real one is simpler....
i´m using the same tubes as meyer one is a 0,5 inch x 4 inch rod having the holes and being longer than the tube which is 2,75 inch long
its all over... the tubes i got from onlinemetals.com the rods i got and machined here inbrazil
all 304 material seamless tubes ks
in the prototype i´m currently using thereis two sets isolated from eachother and having water in each separated from each other of course... and the electrodes were polished and left over night on citric acid 10% concentration
i believe the cell is a conductor of dielectric field.. .simple as that.. .
-
#29 · date not recorded
Hello friends.
Today i purchased one 3D printer kit (prusa i3 model B) on ebay from germany.
I have a co-worker that is a good CAD designer and i will ask for help on solid works, to print some coil formers, and cavities.
When it is running i can print yours and ship it near at cost price.
I cant wait to get it ;-)
-
#30 · date not recorded
Hello friends.
Today i purchased one 3D printer kit (prusa i3 model B) on ebay from germany.
I have a co-worker that is a good CAD designer and i will ask for help on solid works, to print some coil formers, and cavities.
When it is running i can print yours and ship it near at cost price.
I cant wait to get it ;-)
X blade! My best friend!
-
#31 · date not recorded
well, you know what i have...
See my project page.
a 4 cell with the right sizes electrodes with a delrin base.
A frequency generator with mark and space options.
A scope that works fine.
Now the question on how the VIC should look like, as i tried to Don Gable version......
Maybe the goal is to resonate between the coil capacitance and reactance and then the cell as a resister over the LC? -
#32 ·
If you look into "sperm wave" from ronnie walker you can see 2 things:
- Step charging into choke when pulsing
- Coil damping (oscillating) on gate at the same frequency that it was pulsed before, until almost no charge.
Maybe it can be charging the coil to an higher level and then discharged to exiter array.
-
#33 ·
I have here a coil that i have wrapped (single) on a tv flyback core that measures 1850mH, if i pulse it with a diode, on the off time i got an oscillation with 8330hZ. -
#34 ·
If you look into "sperm wave" from ronnie walker you can see 2 things:
- Step charging into choke when pulsing
- Coil damping (oscillating) on gate at the same frequency that it was pulsed before, until almost no charge.
Maybe it can be charging the coil to an higher level and then discharged to exiter array.
which picture of Ron are you refering to? -
#35 · date not recorded
This one:
(http://open-source-energy.org/?action=dlattach;topic=876.0;attach=9033;image)
look into topic here, page 89:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=876.2200
-
#36 · date not recorded
i feel like i´m really too much educated when people come show this waveforms talks nothing about it and even claim to have working cells and i stay quiet... i use to call names for very much less than this...
but time makes us more calm...
i can do same waveform as this in 300 different ways...
this mean that if someone show you somthing and dont explain or show schmatic or dont want you to see or understand you should not waste time on it...
-
#37 ·
amen -
#38 · date not recorded
What i see here is an forced oscillation during the pulse time, rising in amplitude in KV range and then the "ringing" LC at same carrier frequency during gate (pulses off).
But it dont mean a working and producing cell -
#39 · date not recorded
This one:
(http://open-source-energy.org/?action=dlattach;topic=876.0;attach=9033;image)
look into topic here, page 89:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=876.2200
Im waiting on an account activation email to join to see...
That groups policies were if you share and dont explain do not post. -
#40 · date not recorded
=D i didnt meant to attack nor you nor anyone .... is just a point of view of the posture i had and have had having hahah
i think most of us working with huge coils could find the resonance point and when gating it seem just like that.....
i have something new
i have discovered why meyer used more than one vic or had more than 1 there to be used..
the question is not about providing enough current voltage to the cell
he certainly uses in parallel for increasing the force of the voltage fields... like paralleling a magnet.... since amps are restricted they dont add any amp it add only voltage fields at equipotential. but its analogous of having a thicker wire biggr coil...
the greater is the crossection area of the copper the greater is the free electrons available....
so for a same voltage induced a thicker wire would have more oposition to the primary field to maintain the atoms ``ionized " like stan mention than a thin wire... as such it is a bigger charge density formed at the extremities...
remembering magnetic potential is the sum of all magnetic fields..
voltage potential is the sum of all electric fields.. . voltage potential is measure by the force needed to bring this charges together...
Meyer talk about newtons law applied to electric circuit
so voltage is a force within the circuit and amps is what moves like the mass in the commom mechanics... the resistance or power dissipated is the part that does not become kinetic energy or the part that is dissipated as heat.... in the electrical case the kinnetic energy of the charges is the inductive energy amps times inductance... so the capacitance is analogous of a spring where it works by developing an increasing voltage for each electron added..
Last night i made a drawing where the chokes have a commom core and are pulsed... not bifilar... each choke has a parallel capacitor like stan show in the techbrief vic impedance image.
now the chokes connect on both side of the cell one side with the dot and the other not..
than a diode and an external coil (amp inibhiter coil) closes the circuit...
from what i see if the amp inibither coil is there it acts to create the amp restriction and as it reverses its voltage it will sum with the capacitors voltage and create a double pulse...
i was thinking about this cause and effect differences... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ... when a coil is the secondary it will have a current in both directions as the magnetic field rise and fall but when the coil is a primary the current is always in one direction ...
-
#41 ·
probably was not clear that i mean that using the chokes as primary is different than using it as secondary..
the amp inhibitor coil was on external core... in many drawings and a coil on a external core receiving pulsed dc flows currnt in only one direction althohugh there is a voltge flip to keep the currnt flowing...
meyer say he have a charging choke on both sides of the cell
-
#42 ·
the increadible thing is that analizing it the other way round its totaly diferent... bcause the resonance is on the size of the chokes not the amp inibitor as i´m going to refer to here and after related to this configuration where the chokes are pulsed and and the circuit is closed by diode and amp inhbiter coil...
-
#43 · date not recorded
probably was not clear that i mean that using the chokes as primary is different than using it as secondary..
the amp inhibitor coil was on external core... in many drawings and a coil on a external core receiving pulsed dc flows currnt in only one direction althohugh there is a voltge flip to keep the currnt flowing...
meyer say he have a charging choke on both sides of the cell
A charging choke in sense of a secondairy coil?
So, 2 cores. Both with a primary for charging up the secondairys (chokes)?
-
#44 · date not recorded
probably was not clear that i mean that using the chokes as primary is different than using it as secondary..
the amp inhibitor coil was on external core... in many drawings and a coil on a external core receiving pulsed dc flows currnt in only one direction althohugh there is a voltge flip to keep the currnt flowing...
meyer say he have a charging choke on both sides of the cell
And then both chokes discharging positive to the cell?
A charging choke in sense of a secondairy coil?
So, 2 cores. Both with a primary for charging up the secondairys (chokes)? -
#45 · date not recorded
what i mean is the chokes being th secondary (pulsed by a primary) and they are conncted to th cell and on th other side to the diode and another coil (not pulsed) closing the circuit ... like reversing where the pulse come ... instead of the (secondary) applyiung a voltag to th chokes.. the chokes appy a voltage on the "secondary" amp inhb coil -
#46 · date not recorded
Sebosfato There was 1 vic per tube. i cant undestand why people is wiring it in series, or parallel...
Did anyone figured out how feedback coil works? Did all of you know why is a 5v present on the feedback wire via resistor?
I am still waiting what people calls "flux cancellation"...
I hope it opens some minds. -
#47 · date not recorded
This one:
(http://open-source-energy.org/?action=dlattach;topic=876.0;attach=9033;image)
look into topic here, page 89:
http://open-source-energy.org/?topic=876.2200
Im waiting on an account activation email to join to see...
That groups policies were if you share and dont explain do not post.
I'd like to see it but they must not be accepting new members. -
#48 · date not recorded
well there was 11 tubes and 11 vic but i´m talking about anotherthing.. i´m saying that paralleling the vics is possible since it does not sum amps since they restrict the amps... and that it would increase the force of the voltage ...
he could have used all 11 vics for just one tube or maybe 11tubes for 1 vic
the point really is that we get to find the proper frequency and coils sizes for it
the feed back coils and ckt work but need some modification you find in my project section...
the 5v in my view act to reduce the sensibility of the amplifier.... also the diode you see between the transistor and ground also impeed the led to false turn on since the output will not be rail to rail... -
#49 · date not recorded
Sebosfato, no.
This opamp is acting as a comparator.
Google this "opamp as comparator"
The 5V pullup line forces the opamp to be referenced at this level, and the output will feed the signal back to PLL ONLY WHEN IT RISES ABOVE THIS 5V LEVEL.
Out of resonance condition will cancel the flux of the entire core, and feedback will stay very low until "resonance" is achieved.
Anyone got the PDF patent (canadian) about tube cell resonant cavity? i have some words to quote and i lost my files. -
#50 · date not recorded
well basicaly is what i just said... it reduce the sensitivity of the circuit ...
this opamp i used lm 318 is actually 4mv sensitive so in its case is not exactly a comparator because the opapamp has a back to back diode inside look the small words on the datasheet
this made me change the circuit as i described... i use a 1kohm resistors in series with the inputs and i use a coil in series to get 90degrees dephased signal at the back to back diodes in the circuit that goes before the input resistors to get resonance to lock on high voltage ...the other resistors are 1M feedback and 100k to ground...
the feedback coil and this coil in series form a closed circuit thru the back to back diodes with no resistors therebetween the 5 volt give a reference point so that the inputs wont suffer
the input resistor receives about 300mv from the back to back diodes...
its possible to use a capacitor too but i have found that because of the reactances a coils is better to keep the resonance out of the feedback circuit
whithout this change it will work but will not lock well on the high voltage point .. will be aways bellow or above.... or not at all