Step Charge Waveform (scope pictures)- am i on the right way?
#24 · date not recorded
The waveform is to be read by the near vertical lines as that is when it is applying a B+ and B- voltage potential to the plates of the exciter array. In the waveform I showed you I put in five pulses and if you count the near vertical lines you will see it has ten of them which is pulse doubling. The waveform isn't perfect as the B+ and B- voltages need to be as close to being equal as one can get them to be. The time for the near vertical lines has to be faster than the relaxation time for water as when it is the water sees it as being the same time. This is how you read the waveform correctly.
Meyer doesn't state that there needs to be a B+ and B- voltage just to be saying something he is telling us how the technology works to make use of voltage to break the bonds of the water molecules. This is how "The Electrical Polarization Process" works. This time as I re-post the learning information take the time to actually read the information being given to you before spouting off at the mouth with a bunch of nonsense.
(http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y320/h2opower/2015-11-25_031923_zpspsrrfric.png)
Here is a video that will teach you how a differential probe works:
Without this measuring device you simply can't view what this technology doing. You need to be able to get a differential reading of what is happening at the plates of the water fuel capacitor. In science we don't assume there is a negative voltage there we actually measure it with the proper tools for the job.
Using the Electrical Polarization Process to break the bonds of the water molecules is what we are trying to do in replicating Meyer's technology, correct? All of you running around telling people you don't need a negative voltage when Meyer himself clearly states we need an equal negative and positive voltage being applied to the plates of the water fuel capacitor are going against what Meyer teaches about this technology we are all trying to duplicate. You running around believing you don't need a differential probe to be able to view this technology isn't going to change the fact that you do need a differential probe to be able to view this technology.
All the other points you made will be ignored as you simply have no idea what you are talking about as you assume too much with no facts to back up what you are saying. You have no idea what my setup looks like right now as I stopped sharing that information since the 2013 Global BEM to those I don't know or trust. Since you don't have a differential probe you have no idea what the waveform actually looks like as you simply don't have the right tools to be able to view this technology.
