JAFO

Quote from: johnbostick on December 20, 2008, 17:04:49 pm

This is from the "Research Paper on Ravi’s Water Fuel cell Replication"

"Insertion of a laser into the resonance cavity
In Stanley Myers’ research papers, is the insertion of a laser into the cavity, injecting certain light frequencies into the cavity to assist in the fracturing process. This would be done by using a cell with cavity placements for high frequency light-emitting diodes in the area of 395 nm wave length. This cell would be conditioned, prepared and coils wound to suit. After the conditioning process the cell would be finally tested with light-emitting diodes."

I find this 395 nm wave lenght interesting.  That the black light used in forensics

You know i find this interesting Because 395 Nanometers is Exactly what i use inside my fuel cell. I Have also found that it Boostes the gas output by 3 or more times. Of course As mentioned it does not work well with an un-conditioned cell.

I plan on showing this Blacklight in some of my new videos as well, its odd you found this in ravi's Pdf.. Isn't that the same pdf where they're showing/ or tried to show Stevies Alternator Setup?

Brian,

I was using a blacklight awhile back, 2 weeks, and didn't see a significant increase in production. I was using a water bath setup with submerged cells
blacklight was constant not pulsed thru it's own driver. I would be interested in your findings and possibly sharing info.

This covers wavelengths of IR impacts on H20:

http://www.martin.chaplin.btinternet.co.uk/vibrat.html

A few comments / suggestions :

Reducing the burn rate of HHO by mixing with exhaust gasses, ambient air intake, LED, and electricity. Possibly also PCV gases as well.

Switzerland video 1989.

Tad,

I've tried to contact you via email and PM for several weeks now, I would like to replicate your experiments from the late 90's ...
I've searched in vain through sci.energy.hydrogen news groups for your posts....

Can you please provide details for your experiment?

Well, i am talking to myself here.

Not true, I was hunting down a link for us that I ran across while working on my HHO project.

Water Structure and Science -  http://www.martin.chaplin.btinternet.co.uk/index2.html

tons of info on everything water.

@Tad -
Thanks for sharing, again thank you...

The setup (remembering now 12 years ago) was an inverter I had setup for variable frequency and could only be tuned over a small range. I used adjustable chokes on cathode and anode sides. There is a major problem with this cell setup in that it is leaky as stated by Meyer (which I did not understand at the time). Stan told me "resistance is the key". What he meant by that was that the cell voltage will reach zero too quickly and thus the cell will not stay charged. Adding resistance across the secondary portion of the circuit (cell side) allows less leakage and allows the cell to stay charged and producing H2. If you simply use a brute force method with lots of current at the higher voltages it defeats the purpose of the whole process since we want very tiny amounts of current and only high voltages.

Of course all of this has now been solved by JLN and others and it is a simple matter of following their experiments. I am no longer working on this system for the same reason Meyer dropped it. It is a touchy, frustrating process in which constant control of the pulse parameters MUST be kept or else the cell stops producing gas, and ven then there are much better processes to use. Others have found the same problems and dropped it entirely. It is better to use a plasma and break a water vapor up as it enters the intake of the engine.

The setup below shows a much better way to break water, even though it is not exactly what Stan  was doing with the "Water Plug".



I hope that helps a little. Sorry I have not been around much, I have been trying to feed my family and work on more advanced experiments on the weekends. This leaves me literally NO TIME to respond, or help any further than I have. In fact, one of the reasons I came back to look at some posts was that Dankie was calling me a fraud on multiple experimentation sites. Even though he does not know me nor was he there, nor had he seen the results of these crude, early experiments. Even though my wife told me not to respond and simply let it go, I felt the need to at least defend myself if he was going to be as ignorant about these posts of his. So I will clarify anything I can for you but I will not respond any further if I am going to be continuously a fraud or fake.

Tad

Thank you for sharing ...