I have not bought gasoline from EXXON since their oil spill. I haven't seen them go belly up. It's a personal decision each person has to make given all the information they can get pluses and minuses. Before the Gulf Oil Gusher (not Spill) I bought BP gasoline mostly. I have not since. That's my choice.
I've been looking at this portion of the demo cell circuitry and it appears to me that the pulse selector switch is labeled backwards i.e. the basic pulse is set by the 555 then is multiplied by each 7490 chip. If this is true what else might be backwards in the basic circuit diagram? I'm referring to figure 9XB variable pulse generator schematic. Or is my understanding of how the circuit works incorrect...
I had to go back to the technical brief to perhaps clear up what I was trying to explain. Look at figure 3-5 of the technical brief. Follow the path from the laser accelerator to the VIC. The analog voltage generator is separate and somewhere inbetween. There's logic to manage and control it. So what could an analog voltage generator be? I believe it might be similar to figure 7-13. Maybe I'm right maybe I'm wrong.
That Outlawstc was something I brought up a little while ago. But the topic is a good one and something that seemed to have been left out in Stan's drawings to integrate the laser accelerator with the VIC by translating a digital signal to an analog voltage. In my opinion. It's something I will be working on. Just trying to connect the proverbial dots.
Thanks for that. This is helpful. I think the more that is shown that Stan's prototypes are as reflected in his patents gives more credibility. Only thing I have a challenge with is if you pulse a transformer core the generated pulse goes in the other direction. I don't think it matters whether it's ac or pulsed dc the core responds the same way. If the path is blocked by a diode it's only path is the negative or ground tube except for some leakage at the diode. Maybe that's what's going on. So he's using a flyback transformer or similar form then in that version.
Hi Haither I have an idea on that which I'd like to try sometime having to do with endothermic electrolysis. I didn't have much luck previously on stringing tubes in series so I've stuck to parallel wiring for now.
I wasn't able to daisy chain a pwm in the circuit I think I'd need a dc solid state relay. Been meaning to pick one up for a while. All in all results have been interesting but not earth shattering no increase in production more or less the same and the usual increase of temperature over time. Would still like to investigate water circulation in the cell but need a 3/8" pipe tap. There's about 2 feet of snow on the ground outside so I missed my time window.
Ok temperature climbed from 70F to 100F over around 5 hours. Interestingly the bifilar coil I was complaining about being hot in Bubz's thread running from a pwm is cool and it's buzzing. The diode is still hot but not as much; I can keep a finger on it without getting a blister burn. Tubes are wired parallel so each set of 3 is getting 12-14 volts and switching between the sets at around 60 hz. I don't see any steam yet. Production seems less than running with the pwm.
Indeed. I was at aepc 2009 and witnessed Karl Palsness' presentation. Alex Petty was demonstrating something similar with his partner Jeffrey Cook. Not exactly wireless transmission. See Karl Palsness' presentation on youtube.com (hydroalternation's channel) and his other youtube.com videos (palsness) and his thread on energeticforum.com. Then read Telsa's lectures again in a new light.
The Gadetman Grooves are interesting. I think it's not so much about creating more turbulence as it is developing horizontal vortexes of air before the intake manifold. It's very simply a groove in the throttle body of some engines along the butterfly valve plate. It would warrant a separate thread. It has pros and cons.
H2/CO is also known as producer gas or syngas or a component thereof along with methane. During combustion the H2 will combine with atmospheric O2 to form water and CO will combine with atmospheric O2 to form CO2. No scrubbers needed. Both reactions are exothermic.
Best and easiest reference I found was : "Wood gas is flammable because of the carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and methane content." from here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_gas
That is the conclusion I recently reached regarding Stan's circuit. His inspiration was Tesla's method of conversion of high potential and frequency and Stan modified it slightly so the path was unidirectional. Before the rotary switch there was the spark gap and then Tesla would quench the spark magnetically or by air or otherwise. Stan uses the 555 and divide by 8 or 10 counters to simulate the rotary switch in solid state. IF there's communication between the wfc and the vic then it's the pickup coil that's the "antenna" for feedback to the front end. I don't see much difference between what Stan was doing and what Tesla was studying and publishing and patenting. The difference is where Stan publishes the location of some components like the scr. The front end should get a nice sine wave and the back end should switch on and off very fast. If I want 50% duty cycle I would use ac like a center tap transformer, a half wave bridge and 2 or a multiple of 2 tubes or tube arrays. For 3 phase a multiple of 3 tubes. It's as simple or as complicated as one wants to make it.
Ok recently dudleyengineering shared a basic transformer handbook with us. I can't find it here now but after reading most of it here is what I found.
A longitudinal winding of a primary with a bidirectional secondary describes what is called a parametric converter. It has unique properties with regards to a standard transformer configuration. A core with magneto-restrictive properties such as nickel doubles the input frequency by changing its length.
I think I said that EEC has to do with gases. The patents and TB differ in describing the EEC but they talk about a grid above the water in contact with the gases and methods of discharging the charge built up on the grid. How the electrostatic filter is hooked up isn't very clear but it may be part of the EEC. Kelvin generator doesn't need an external pulsing circuit to light a neon bulb or produce a spark. Parts of the patents describe the hydrogen ion being part of the EEC taking a negative charge from the positive oxygen ions. H2- is found in outer space so it's not an imaginary thing. The question in my mind is how stable are all these ions until they're ignited. If some electrons are discharged into the water then that would shift the auto-ionization of the water and its pH without adding chemical electrolyte. Anyway that's my take on it.
I think the EEC circuit is not so much removing electrons from the water but removing electrons from the produced gases. I see a similarity between the concept of an EEC and the kelvin generator although I don't know if they both work on the same concept.
If you actually read the original source regarding Rayleigh's nacient nitrogen you would discover that the effects he described occurred at near vacuum and disappeared with more pressure in vacuum tubes. So in my mind it's more an effect found with Correas' work than what will happen in an ICE.
The production of NOx is an endothermic reaction. It's a byproduct of combustion at high temperatures. Cold water fog would alleviate that effect with flash steam and the high heat capacity of water. The water vapor in the exhaust that Stan recycles he also tries to cool with a heat exchanger or cooling fins.
Over a year ago Patrick Kelly categorized Nitrogen Hydroxide in the "dubious devices" list. You also proclaimed that the Bedini SSG circuit was the answer to the secret of the WFC Aaron. I am not joining that bandwagon. But if someone else sees merit it's their choice.