Are you talking of the newsreel footage at the end of the 1983 Einsledeln lecture? I see a large cylindrical container on the back of the dune buggy with a flanged cover. Not the resonant cavity cell you described. Thanks.
I've seen various references to the term "boiler plate". My understanding of the term originally was related to document production where various other files were added to one central file for streamlining office work. I just reviewed all the Meyer videos (bought from waterfuelcell.org) and saw him refer to the dune buggy as the "boiler plate" for his patent applications. So, when someone refers to boiler plate cell as dynodon did is that the demo cell or some other configuration? It helps in understanding to define terms for me at least. I have a better understanding now of the difference between the demo cell and resonant cavity cell thanks to dynodon. Thanks.
For the resonance cells were all the windings unidirectional and solenoidal in form? I've seen your photos of the delrin forms for VIC where one slides over the other just curious what you saw and what you think.
Meyer has about a dozen different ways of wiring a vic which is basically a transformer and in his videos he states that the reason is so no one can go around his patents and IP. But in the Technical Brief he mentions longitudinally wrapping the primary . I've been trying to figure out what he meant by that and have found no references to longitudinally wrapping a coil anywhere. I'm thinking this is might also be related to his other ideas related to magnetic gases and the MHD HyperDrive that Griffin writes about.
In the Technical Brief there's 2 vics one with all copper wire and one with bifilar stainless steel wire which I believe has magnetic properties. So he describes applying the stainless steel bifilar chokes bidirectional i.e. back and forth and then wrapping on top and longitudinally the primary wire. After thinking about this for a while I'm guessing that the chokes act as a solenoid coil but the primary is acting like a long thin toroid coil which I have seen described as a solenoid with infinite length. So before I try this I'm wondering if anyone else has done this and Dynodon have you seen anything like this.
Yeah well angels weren't much help when he was being poisoned. And scared his brother from pursuing the technology further and his brother-in-law to move to Canada and concentrate on waste water treatment. I don't believe for one minute that Stan's twin brother has no clue on what his brother was doing. He's just decided to live life in the Heartland without the threat of death over his and his family's head. I can't blame him.
Religious is a general term that encompasses all religions. Christians would proclaim "Christ is Lord", Muslims would proclaim something else as would Jews or Buddhists or whatever take your pick. Christian isn't the only religion last time I checked. It may be your religion but not everyone else's. Whatever works for the individual as long as other individual's beliefs are not infringed upon. That's one of the pillars on which this country was based among others.
My understanding is that Stephen Chambers is Stan and Stephen Meyer's brother-in-law. I can't cite an exact reference but I seem to have read it somewhere.
Dynodon, what you report has been confirmed by others. There are other problems in the Technical Brief as well like omitting the neutron in doing calculations with atomic weights. The neutron is relevant.
I have a video I downloaded of Stan Meyer's twin Steve. It may be of interest. He also has a website: http://hydrotechgroup.com/default.aspx . Happy Thanksgiving to all
Been a while since I posted to this thread. I've spent my time when not working on researching and building a resonant cell array. Not being a machinist the build has been challenging and on hold until I obtain another drill press. I had to return the one I borrowed.
Meanwhile I'd like to share some thoughts regarding AC electrolysis and how Puharich and Meyer might have gone that route and what its advantages are/were. One has to kind of research the history of discovery and where we are today and how we got here.
I propose a simple experiment. I have not done it yet but it seems feasible. Take one wire from a household outlet and wire it to the center of a couple of diodes similar to an avremenko plug. Take those 2 wires and connect to a light bulb. Compare the draw from the source to using 2 wires. Try with the hot wire and the common wire and see if there's a difference in draw from the source. Measure the heat evolved from the circuit and the light bulb with the different configurations. This is with a one phase or if you will a 2 phase system since you can do both wires separately and light 2 bulbs. This relates to Meyer's use of AC to drive his demo cells with household AC current and 3 phase alternator with 9 tubes and pulsing the rotor. With no load an electric single or 3 phase motor will draw some amps and more amps with load. Then the circuit needs to be "tuned". This is sort of related to early automotive ignition systems and positive ground system. I will post results soon probably after the holidays. It sort of makes sense to me why there are 9 tubes in the demo cell and 9 wires exiting a 3 phase filar or bifilar generator/alternator and why there are 9 switches. Any and all of the tubes can individually be on or off with respect to the source. Meyer only in my opinion gives half of the story but it is his truth and discovery. We all need to start thinking in higher dimensions not just linearly. The universe is not flat it is an infinite sphere. The water molecule is one of the smallest representations of that universe. Happy Holidays,
Didn't Dynodon share a circuit diagram with component values not too long ago? I am pretty sure it was from one of Stan's boxes from the Estate for the demo wfc or varialble plate. I think that's what Donaldwfc is working off of; same circuit that's published in patent and in Independent Evaluation Report.
I wanted to reacquaint myself with molecular oxygen and came across this in wikipedia's entry:
"Oxygen gas can also be produced through electrolysis of water into molecular oxygen and hydrogen. DC electricity must be used: if AC is used, the gases in each limb consist of hydrogen and oxygen in the explosive ratio 2:1. Contrary to popular belief, the 2:1 ratio observed in the DC electrolysis of acidified water does not prove that the empirical formula of water is H2O unless certain assumptions are made about the molecular formulae of hydrogen and oxygen themselves."
and here I thought use of AC would generate steam. It may be the wikipedia entry is in error. I don't know.
The reason I was looking into it was I was wondering where the electrons were coming from in a hydrogen fuel cell when H2 is combined with atmospheric O2. If 2 molecules of each electrically neutral gas is combined to form 2 molecules of electrically neutral H2O molecule where are the electrons produced coming from?
Just to update I did manage to wire tubes in series with voltage around 6-7 volts; temperature stabilized from 70F to 90F but production was diminished. I then tried to run half the tubes via pwm and induce voltage using a bifilar coil but got no induction. pwm is rated at max 3 khz. I think that's it. Happy Holidays to everyone.
I reconfigured everything so center is positive and outer is ground path. Haven't daisy chained the pwm yet I need some connectors but the inverter circuit is working switching at 60 hz or thereabouts. Center is charged and 3 of 6 tubes get discharged back and forth in a circular motion. It's similar to what Dr. Cramton is doing except with one phase instead of 3. Patrick Kelly updated chapter10.pdf if anyone is interested. Bifilar coil is connected between the inverter negative switches and outer tubes in parallel if it makes any difference. I tried it in anti-parallel but the inverter didn't seem to like it. Watching temperature now.
I did an experiment last night since someone told me AC electrolysis doesn't work so I had to prove it to myself using Puharich's patent as a guide (sort of).
I had gotten a low watt inverter circuit to play with a while ago to replace the one that burst into flames previously. It had a short somewhere in the tubular array I was using. Poof.
Anyway the circuit came without a center tap transformer. One wire connects positive and the other 2 wires switch to ground. I connected the positive to all the outside tubes and one ground wire each to half of the set of inside electrodes. I used one diode after the positive between the inverter and wfc. It worked but not especially impressively and different coil configurations except for one would trigger a breaker in the circuit. At least no flames this time. I'm now considering daisy chaining the pwm that I have inbetween the inverter and the wfc. Fingers crossed.
I've seen patents of stan's where there's a center tap on the secondary with a diode and another coil perhaps where the pickup and feedback is taking place.
The closest "replication" of a hairpin circuit for producing hydroxy is Dave Lawton's "cold electricity" wfc replication. If you follow the flow it's similar to Karl Palsness' Tesla stout copper rod or hairpin circuit. The missing element according to Karl is mass. That's my take on it. Not what Karl said as regards to hydroxy generation but what I think. Watch the videos, re-read Tesla and experiment.
Probably wax paper as from a cereal box container but I defer to Dynodon to definitively answer that. And wax paper and oil have dielectric properties. Even vacuum has a dielectric property. There is no perfect insulator.
Every once in a while I come across a gem amidst all the sand.
Anyone who also looks at energeticforum.com topics should check out the thread missing fundamental generator.
He talks about the effect 1/2 frequencies overlaid on basic frequency effects the overall frequency. A square wave will naturally decay at 1/3, 1/5... etc frequencies so it looks like falling down a staircase the waveforms displayed in the thread look remarkably like Meyer's waveforms and may be why he was using decade counters. It looks also like another trick to restrict amps due to conservation of energy i.e. as voltage increases amps decrease. It shows the importance of tuning into that resonance effect regardless of if it's electrical or acoustic or whatever. So if rectified house current is rectified at 120 hz and is overlaid with a 1200 hz frequency chopping up the fundamental frequency there should be a voltage intensifying effect. If one starts out with a dirty signal it may be harder to tune into.
