Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

bluestix

9 posts · 58 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Jan 2013 and Mar 2013

An identity on Energy Science Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Atomic Hydrogen Furnace

#2 ·

I've read it. Fascinating stuff. Super simple to build too.

Probably not super safe unless you know what you are doing. That's probably why he suggests sticking with Hydrogen instead of using Helium which he describes as being much more powerful. Too powerful to be safe.

I would be willing to contribute to an open source project in whatever way I can.
I thought it was pretty obvious that when he said 'non-combustible gases' he meant Nitrogen (Air). It wouldn't be reasonable or cost effective to use any other gas because you would have to buy tanks of it.

A lot of the simple points that Stan made clearly seem to be misunderstood or ignored by most of the people studying his work so I guess this is no exception.

Faraday88 wrote:

Hi Bluestix,
There is one major aspect of the Hydroxy gas that most of us fail to understand: the Gases produced by each of the methods of all the electrolytic process vary in the degree of what was ultimately produced by the Meyer process.
if you read Gorge wiseman book BROWN'S GAS 2 he mentions about what is termed as the 'HYPER GAS', i personally belive Stan Meyer produced Hyper Gas and knew what it was and this theory is consistent with even Gorge wiseman describing the Hydroxy (beyond Brown's Gas) as 'Electrically expanded form of Water'.
Best Regards,
Faraday88.

image_placeholder.svg


http://pondscienceinstitute.on-rev.c.../UNIVER~9.JPEG

Woody wrote:


The question that must be asked is, if the first installation in the Dodge truck was so successful (3,000 mile trip, etc.) as was presented in the video, why could he not reproduce the same results once he got to Square1 and began development of the production version? Either the first video was a total deception, or some kind of suppression/sabotage program was indeed undertaken to quash it.
-Woody
From the top of the article on Peswiki:

We've not heard from him since around a week after we published this story.

Other then that I see no useful information at the Peswiki link.

Click image for larger version  Name: kunta-kinte-getting-whipped.jpg Views: 1 Size: 30.4 KB ID: 45179


While their system was obviously not as well tuned as Stan Meyers it was still clearly not standard electrolysis.

People should watch all of Stans lectures. They are all on youtube.

Woody wrote:

By the way, Fred Wells was one of those who was thinking electrolysis, and hydrogen. He was dumping 55amps into his fuel cell. If you want to replicate Stan's processes, you cannot be doing it with current!!! That is why he could run the truck for a few minutes, but then had to pull over and allow the pressure to build again. Of course, with the engine not running the fuel cell is drawing 55a from the battery, and before long the battery is dead, and no more gas.

-Woody
55 amps @ 12V is only 660 watts. That is less then one horsepower. If that produces enough gas to make the engine turn over then it is easily enough to keep the battery charged. The alternator on my truck can easily provide way more amps then that.

kevin wrote:

bluestix
where do you find info on this video?
they talked about a web site but never named it
K
That video is several years old. Those people are probably dead or in hiding.

"I've been poisoned" -- Stan Meyer

AMPPMEUPP wrote:

but I don't see anyone replicating those processes right now.
R.
That's because very soon after someone posts information about their success in replicating this technology they get a visit from the local agents of the global slavery machine informing them to cease and desist immediately.

This technology is considered a very real threat to the stability of the international slavery system and any research or publication in this area is punishable by death.

Ravi's Water Fuel Cell Suppressed in India

AMPPMEUPP wrote:

Stan Meyer took his secrets with him
No he didn't. He left hours and hours of video lectures explaining in very clear and simple language how his process works. There have been many successful replications. There are plenty of videos on youtube showing these replications including a vehicle running completely on a basic version of his system.

If 1000 people each tried to build an internal combustion engine at their house then 999 of them would fail. That doesn't mean that internal combustion engines are some great mystery that we will never know the secrets of. It just means most people are idiots with minimal technical knowledge and skill.