How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style
Started by remelic · · 15 posts · last reply 22 May 2010
-
#1 ·
-
#2 ·
It wouldn't let me edit so here is a fixed link
Webhuset er en erfaren norsk leverandør av domene, hosting og e-post med over 25 000 kunder. Enkle og stabile løsninger siden 1998.
Thanks -
#3 ·
Experiment
Here is a smaller version of the process that anyone can try to see if it works.
-A PMH, preferably built to Ed's specifications
-The size of the stone: 3"D x 4"H x 8"L
-The type of stone should be part of the experimentation
but try a non-ferrous stone like limestone or a calcite-crystal first.
-12-Volt Car Battery
-Floating Container like a plastic or glass bowl.
Charge up the PMH by tapping the switch on the negative terminal. Then pull the keeper/crossbar off the PMH. The theory is that the water level will change on the container holding the stone. If you reverse the poles you should notice the water level change in the opposite direction. This setup should lighten the stone by using static-discharge or magnetic-discharge?
Peter
Cheers to Ed. -
#4 ·
Make sure to look into this:
-
#5 ·
Great Job on those Images Peter.
So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity?
I haven't read his work as of yet
, I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do.
I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
Cheers,
-
#6 ·
Also, Ed said nothing about it reducing Gravity but he does say he understood gravity. He was obsessed with magnets and according to this source: "A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' " - Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaHarvey wrote:
Great Job on those Images Peter.
So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity?
I haven't read his work as of yet, I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do.
I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
This theory only uses the PMH as its tool.
Cheers,
I wouldn't say it has anything to do with gravity but i guess it could if you look at it like that. This is a magnetic effect.
Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less static-magnetism the more is weighs..
When you discharge the chain you are discharging equal amounts of neg/pos magnets into the stone adding to its static-charge and thus reducing it's mass until the stone reaches equilibrium again with its surroundings.
This may be a wet dream but I believe in a Magnetic Universe and this is completely possible using magnetic particles as the lifters.
Just because something isn't attracted or repelled by magnets does not mean it cannot be affected by them. After-all anything made of Atoms can be altered by magnets and if you have access to the magnetic particles then anything is possible.
Peter -
#7 ·
"A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' "
Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia -
#8 ·
I will be experimenting so I will document the findings either way. If it goes well or not, it may answer other questions that have no relation so it's worth trying.
I will keep you posted but don't expect results too soon. Maybe a month or two.
Thanks. -
#9 ·
Hi Peter,
You have quoted me above, but then you have inserted a few lines there in my quote - essentially making it appear that I have said those things whereas I have not.
This is a common mistake when quoting posts and is easily corrected.
Edit your post and simply remove the lines you have inserted that appear before the '[/quote]' tag and add them after that tag and all will be fixed
Best Regards,
Harvey -
#10 ·
Sorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site. -
#11 ·
remelic wrote:
Sorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site.
No worries, I understand.
As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true.
Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it.
Cheers,
Harvey -
#12 ·
Lets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti gravitational effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in several free energy researchers.remelic wrote:
....Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less static-magnetism the more is weighs.....
Peter
Its the same thing no matter the application.
Nice stuff you wrote.
Cheers
Matt -
#13 ·
Ah sorry about that again. heh. I just noticed the line I forgot to quote.Harvey wrote:
No worries, I understand.
As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true.
Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it.
Cheers,
Harvey
- This line should be quoted by Harvey in post #6.Harvey wrote:
I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
I guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative sources so I would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it.Matthew Jones wrote:
Lets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti gravitational effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in several free energy researchers.
Its the same thing no matter the application.
Nice stuff you wrote.
Cheers
Matt -
#14 ·
I don't want to argue semantics but...remelic wrote:
I guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative sources so I would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it.
If that were the case it wouldn't pick up rocks. It wouldn't pick up anything. The generator creates negative energy, charges the PMH and the PMH emits an anti gravitational field. The charge come from a combination of magnetic fields.
This can't be done with energy in its definition. EMF, Iron Induced magnetism, radiation, or anything the like. This is another beast altogether that is opposite of our understanding. It the same source for the constant acceleration and expansion of the universe. Planetary rotation and so on.
And magnetism is not static in any form. Iron induced magnetics have constant rotating fields. If it were static there would be no more effect from the magnetism.
One of the primary reasons people have to go over and over with the theory of this whole area of study is do to the semantics that everyone has to come up with every time we have a discussion. New words that could mean anything flying off the shelf as fast as one can imagine them.
We have clear and well used definitions for most of this stuff, why can't they be used.
Keep it simple, ya know?
I apologize for being petty.
Matt -
#15 ·
No need to apologize, I listen to everyone. I will have to read into Negative Energy more to make a decision.Matthew Jones wrote:
I apologize for being petty.
Sign in to reply, or ask for an account.