Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

Matthew Jones

47 posts · 2 threads started · 367 more in threads this archive does not carry · writing between Oct 2008 and Aug 2017

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Co2 dissociation without electricity.. With wood pellet

#5 ·

OK I get it. You only built it and you are not sure (Via testing) if it really working. The document was not a stipulation on the question. The question was had you tested your statement. Obviously not... Maybe you plan too.

Thanks for the very apparent answer.

Matt

Co2 dissociation without electricity.. With wood pellet

#4 ·

Do you know for a fact that the gas coming out is O2 or the percentage of dissociated gas that is present to the ratio of CO2?
Not to belittle what your saying or anything but it kinda looks like a blow torch to me. I am not sure how a plasma reaction is actually present. How do you some that up?
Also not sure what it would take but the use of externally compressed air might not be needed if you could set up a small system that captured air and heated it via check valves and a venturi setup. Not sure how to describe any better. Kinda of a heat pump to build pressure.

No matter whats going on it sure does look fun to play with.

Matt

laser-saser reactor

#12 ·

Dingus wrote:

Something tells me he never actually built most of the things he posts diagrams of.
I don't think its worth pickin on him. One of these days he may truly post a work of genius and then you'll ignore him, just because you had to adhere to your past words.
Now don't get me wrong the whole theory thing is for the birds, but at least he has original ideas and he bothers to draw them. Most of the theorist couldn't even crayon the theories they spew as fact. And the ones who can are constantly wrong even though they $10k software from OUTERSPACE to draw them.

Keep it up FM

Matt

GDS 3 KW generator runs on water

#9 ·

You got to be suspicious when the obvious sales man has nothing more than little bells and whistles to talk about. If it was serious those things wouldn't be what you wanted to hear about.

"Thats a good little gauge.."

Matt

History Help Needed

#11 ·

No I have that one this patent had a cutaway of a whole car with a man standing next to it. I still have not found it but I have found 20 or so people who have seen it.

It just disappeared!!!

Keep trying though.

Thanks A lot though, I appreciate any help with this.
Matt

History Help Needed

#8 ·

I don't think so. It was just another inventor I had never heard his name. Still haven't found it.

It kinda bothers because I had a copy at one time and it all just disappeared, and that is most peoples story.

I hope it shows up soon.

Matt

History Help Needed

#4 ·

Thanks for the extras all. Still haven't found the one I am looking for but I will.

I am trying to find anything also that was patented or would be found in "Text Book" type publication. A lot of references, understandably, do not show up except in personal type history blog's or small current articles with no reference, so it would understandable again if no one believed it.

So anything that has documentation would also be welcome. I do have pretty good list going already after combing through the patent office US, UK and now working on Europe.

But I appreciate any input.

Just for your info we are working on a talking points project for various spokes people in environmental who have no rebuttal for the statement "We have nothing that can directly replace fossil fuels in vehicles".

In other woods we do not want that to be the last word.

Matt

History Help Needed

#1 ·

I am looking for a patent that I had at one time from about 1916 of a car and a system that was proposed to run on water (or HHO).

The patent had picture in it of the entire car with man standing next to it and cut away of the cars fuel system showing a cell of plates that was powered by a the cars generator.

It was issued around 1916 - 1920.

I spoke to several others who have seen it and I used to have a copy but it since has disappeared.

If anybody knows this patents and can post a link or email it please do so. I need this. It not for a replication but a history report of sorts.

Thanks
Matt

Tesla switch

#4 ·

wrtner wrote:

I heard that Ron Brandt knew Tesla and worked with him.
If you go through "Use for the Tesla Switch" John Bedini explains how it came about or at least their understanding and part in it. Brandt did not know Tesla. Tesla Did not invent the Tesla Switch it was named that by John.

More than Likely All the versions of it stem from the Carlos Benitez patents From 1914 and on.

Alot of the stories around it are just that. Stories get told over and over and every time they get bigger and better.

It is a very capable device for extending the existing power in a battery bank. It is to date the only true device that practices conservation of energy to very high level that I have seen, and worked with.

Anybody who has the time should study it but do not expect miracles. Be ready for time consuming hard work.

Matt

Trying to develop solution for off-grid machine shop

#5 ·

Nope.

They are using small systems all over Brazil to store energy. The reference you have there is for a large scale system. Megawatts.

Solar/Wind powered pumps and micro turbines and the ability to store few thousand gallons to Tens of thousands of gallons water.

Its the perfect low cost high efficiency battery.

Do more than search Google's front page, and you might learn something.

Matt

Renewable energy and how its changing the world

#14 ·

exxcomm0n wrote:

The CO2 tax in the USA is targeted at completing the transition from family owned farms to corporate farming. When that happens, corporations will have complete control of the food supply.
Individuals will not be able to afford the CO2 "credits" and/or complete all the paperwork necessary to become compliant with the law.
Corporations will be able to easily the OC2 credits cost and will pay it until they are able to completely ignore it due to a future piece of legislation that absolves them from the need to pay.......

But just like all those other "little laws" that a great majority break because they were set up to be broken by a great majority, it will give a gov't another angle to arrest the american citizen easily and "legally".
Thats funny. I live slap in the middle of a whole bunch of family farms and Ranch's. Most of them either just increased their income or are in the process of increasing there income through NO TILL Carbon credit sales and Sustained Forestation programs that are funded by carbon credits.

The funny side effect of the NO TILL is Monsanto Round Up tolerant Soy Bean does not so well in a NO till situation. The farmers are switching strains. I can't remember the name off the top of my head, but it actually consumes the plants around it while growing and produces nitrogen in the soil. Just like Rye and Winter wheat.

And this is happening in alot of places.

If you look at the Seed Law you are referring to, it allow for Americans to demand that foreign grown crop are compliant with American Standard. The seed that is not is then not allowed to be propagated for American sale by anybody.

But I forgive ya for being confused and mislead by conspiracy sales men. There is alot of Latin terms and big words in legislation so it kind of hard to understand the breast of what is being wrote. Especially when you need that 10 minute article to explain it all.

You have to look into these things yourself, conspiracy is a consumable and people like you are the junky that is addicted.

Matt

Renewable energy and how its changing the world

#12 ·

Joit wrote:

0,038% and it did change over 20 Years 50%? thats about 0,0011%
The gases what comes sometimes out in a Disco are pure CO2 also,
i think the Relation there is even higher then 50%, but its not very hard to breathe in this Cloud.
But it s right to care about the other Emmissions, the first time i saw this Chimneys from some Companys, why dont they put actually Filters in there.
Need to say, that it been all bigger Companys like Siemens,
which even would have the Money to build better Chimneys,
but they didnt. And well, that was before 20 Years........

Where all this money do go to from this Co2Tax?
I dont know, because when i compare any Truck and any Car what is moved
each day, and the additional Tax what you have to pay everywhere on it,
then is the Amount, what they give back in form of subventions
just a ridicoulus amount.
Well you have made your case. With CO2 come other poisons these should be regulated if not stopped all together.
Your basically against CO2 regulation because of taxes, but in turn you have allowed your government to set the standards for what happens to the money they raise from the taxes.
I don't know where your at most likely Europe. But there is no reason to tolerate a closed process of tax and spend.
Have petition, riot, flip some cars over and burn something. It not like it doesn't happen Europe already. And most of the time it makes a difference. Make the politicians notice.

I personally wish we had more people who would do it in the states. Just start destroying stuff when the government gets goofy.

We wouldn't have these problems today.

Matt

Renewable energy and how its changing the world

#9 ·

Your right Red.
To some it up, No matter the front you fight on, inevitably we are all trying to go in the same direction.
We all no matter our beliefs want something better, cleaner and fairer than what we have now.
So there is no reason alienate each other based on few theoretical differences.

Cheers Brother's
Matt

Renewable energy and how its changing the world

#7 ·

redrichie wrote:

Matthew,
I am pretty sure we stand on different aisles of the political spectrum. But I am not closed minded and I do think Co2 is not a good thing to be pumping into the atmosphere. But I do not agree with taxing it. Really, another tax. To pay for what? It will only prop an out of control global government anyhow. What will that money pay for? Not a dime will be reinvested into renewable energy. You have to know this. I mean seriously, what the hell does Al Gore "jetting" around the world got to do with anything? He was a stick figure in the background of a President. Now he is trying to get greedy companies taxed for emissions. A tax, for a greedy government...he is a FORMER vice President. He is by all rights a private citizen now. A celebrity if you will. What does he have to gain by getting tax money for governments? Lots apparently. He or they should get nothing. Its a giant scam man! You cant possible think that a giant corporation pays taxes do you? NO!!! we pay them for them. Their price just goes up, and we get stuck with the bill. Which is then TAXED again 30 times down the road till it gets to us where it is taxed again. Taxing emissions isnt going to stop the emissions. It will just make it a very expensive emission, but it will be produced none the less. This is the biggest scam I have ever heard of. If thats the case then a meter has to be put on every tail pipe of every internal combustion engine, and every breathing mouth on the planet. LEts just tax everything, let them get richer and more powerful, while we get taxed into nothingness. If there was only a once a year tax, and you kept ALL your money for the year, then had to write a check for 50% of the money you worked for, how would that make you feel. Like you just helped the Gov? Or like you just got kicked in the guts with a football cleat? Come on you just gave half your hard earned money to a government that didnt do anything for you.
I do agree that solar/wind and anything else we can do is beneficial. I know you are almost energy independent. Good job my friend. I wish all of us could be.
I am not going to speak on Federal Level. But this state (NC) already has a tax on emissions and credits for non emissions. The money does get invested back into green energy. IT also gets funneled to the "Power Assistance" programs around the state. To help people in need. Some of it goes to grants for energy research at the University level. Some gets invested in Municipalities and the Grid structure they own. There is a clear record of the spending involved and it is easy to track.
Maryland, where I was formerly, Is now doing alot of the same things. But they encouraging people in the poverty rates to invest in Solar with several programs that help use carbon credit money. Lowering the overall debt to cooperations by working class people.

Taxes can work, and YOU must demand that they do. You are not changing anything by making everything the object of greed and frustration. Every Voice helps. Make your self heard, not ignored because ignorance.
I don't give a hoot about Al Gore. I had my beliefs long before he cam along in the white house.

I have no doubt things are screwed up. Alot of things are wrong. But that should not stop the effort to make things better.

Joit wrote:

Very funny Picture of that.
But anyway, can you tell me,
how much CO2 is actually at the Atmosphere?
Or maybe guess ? 10% ? 20% ? 60%?? or more or less ?
And what does make you sure, that it is the lack of Oxygen or the higher Ammount of CO2?
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...g-swindle.html
On average 387 part per million. The last time the levels were that high we had lots of volcano's active and only microbial life was present.
Thats pretty easy information to come by. And its a pretty founded theory, albeit a theory, because most of the carbon count come from geographical layers in the earth.
I am not worried about a lack of oxygen. I am worried about the resulting gases like methane and such that are released do to excessive heating of the atmosphere. Ice and Frost melting and such.
The heat creates a compounding problem. Even if this a natural event why should we contribute. We all know we don't need fossil fuels so why not make it harder for them to exist and be consumed. Then we can roll back to the poisons that accompany it.

I am not going to bother arguing my commitment to what I believe. Just look around. Something got to change. At least on personal level we have to excuse ourselves from the run a of mill consumer and encourage others to as well, no matter the tactic or the cause.

Matt

Renewable energy and how its changing the world

#4 ·

joe 2 wrote:

Just one question,

If we are being told to save the world by or glorious goverment by cutting fossil fuels then why did the banks cut off funding to tesla? stan meyer murdered and his technology suppressed? in scotland wave power technology proved to be very successful but the banks would not fund them and there are many more.
At the time the world was a near endless place (in the minds of people). The greed of industry was at the same level it was today. Gasoline was dumped in the ocean up until the 1915, as a bi product to kerosene production. Unfortunately the cooperate mentality has not change since then. Hence the answer to your questions. Banks and cooperations run the government through the political process, and they do not want competition.
But a slight push and the right incentives from government, along with consumer demand can change these behaviors by cooperations. We have seen it to many times.

joe 2 wrote:

Any green issue like Cap n trade and co2 has another agenda and nothing to do with saving the planet. co2 they say is now a poison with zero scientific evidence.... well just about anything these dangerous idiots (goverment) say is crap please do not encourage them.
What is wrong with a tax on CO2? IE cap and trade. Along with CO2 production come Airborne Mercury, Lead, cyanide, particulates of all kinds of compounds, and carbon monoxide.
I don't want those things in the air so if CO2 is what is measured and taxed so be it.
Besides there are concrete fax that CO2 has not been at the level it is today in many 100' of thousands of years. Are you certain at such levels Co2 is not poison.
Little experiment for ya. Put your head in an airtight plastic bag and wrap up the ends, around neck with duct tape. When you are about to pass out open the bag and immediately start writing the description of the headache you now have. Not Poison?

joe 2 wrote:

Solar and wind is good and has it`s place but will never run a industrial country.
But it could run the the residential part of an industrial nation. As well as small occupancy business's. So there is no reason not to encourage it.

Any other close minded theories on what we should in the "NOW" is plane foolish. We need to do everything no matter how half heart and we need to do it now.

Matt

Suppression document and YouTube

#10 ·

Well the biggest shame is people's persistent behavior when it come to dealing with this stuff.
Why patent anything? Why cooperate? Sign the papers, go to a lawyers office and post it on the Internet. And dare them to charge you with any crime.

The other shame is how we have convinced ourselves that we should as some form of progressive, be a peace loving people. "To know is enough to combat".
Rubish!!!

I don't know, I am glad everyday I move further from needing anything from society. This is probably the only reason I don't just flat out commit violence on someone. But I keep my guns clean and my ammo dry.

Matt

The time remaining

#4 ·

Duncan wrote:

...............
What sort of energy device can be built that can operate when the infrastructure has collapsed? .........

Earth Batteries and a Joule thief or two to charge regular batteries. Simple and easy to build.

Matt