Skip to content
Stan’s Legacy

remelic

9 posts · 1 thread started · writing between May 2010 and May 2010

An identity on Energetic Forum as it was harvested, not an account on this site. Nobody here has claimed it, and nothing connects it to a person by name.

Matthew Jones wrote:

I apologize for being petty.
No need to apologize, I listen to everyone. I will have to read into Negative Energy more to make a decision.

Harvey wrote:

No worries, I understand.

As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true.

Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it.

Cheers,

Harvey
Ah sorry about that again. heh. I just noticed the line I forgot to quote.

Harvey wrote:

I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
- This line should be quoted by Harvey in post #6.


Matthew Jones wrote:

Lets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti gravitational effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in several free energy researchers.
Its the same thing no matter the application.

Nice stuff you wrote.
Cheers
Matt
I guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative sources so I would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it.
I will be experimenting so I will document the findings either way. If it goes well or not, it may answer other questions that have no relation so it's worth trying.

I will keep you posted but don't expect results too soon. Maybe a month or two.

Thanks.

Harvey wrote:

Great Job on those Images Peter.

So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity?

I haven't read his work as of yet , I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do.

I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
Also, Ed said nothing about it reducing Gravity but he does say he understood gravity. He was obsessed with magnets and according to this source: "A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' " - Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This theory only uses the PMH as its tool.

Cheers,


I wouldn't say it has anything to do with gravity but i guess it could if you look at it like that. This is a magnetic effect.

Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less static-magnetism the more is weighs..

When you discharge the chain you are discharging equal amounts of neg/pos magnets into the stone adding to its static-charge and thus reducing it's mass until the stone reaches equilibrium again with its surroundings.

This may be a wet dream but I believe in a Magnetic Universe and this is completely possible using magnetic particles as the lifters.

Just because something isn't attracted or repelled by magnets does not mean it cannot be affected by them. After-all anything made of Atoms can be altered by magnets and if you have access to the magnetic particles then anything is possible.

Peter
Experiment

Here is a smaller version of the process that anyone can try to see if it works.



-A PMH, preferably built to Ed's specifications
-The size of the stone: 3"D x 4"H x 8"L
-The type of stone should be part of the experimentation
but try a non-ferrous stone like limestone or a calcite-crystal first.
-12-Volt Car Battery
-Floating Container like a plastic or glass bowl.

Charge up the PMH by tapping the switch on the negative terminal. Then pull the keeper/crossbar off the PMH. The theory is that the water level will change on the container holding the stone. If you reverse the poles you should notice the water level change in the opposite direction. This setup should lighten the stone by using static-discharge or magnetic-discharge?

Peter

Cheers to Ed.